Representation of Muslims in Don DeLillo’s Falling Man: A Critical Discourse Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1604.05Keywords:
CDA, literature, stereotype, ideology, identityAbstract
The novel Falling Man, like Don DeLillo’s other works, is thematically concerned with the symbolic aspect of terrorist violence as portrayed in the media. Furthermore, DeLillo’s story investigates the potential of rewriting individual identity, as well as the tendency of people to establish their identities using a community mindset. This article examines the portrayal of Muslims in Don DeLillo’s Falling Man, focusing on their difficulties during the period that saw the rise of terrorism. Although the image of Muslims in literature is becoming increasingly prevalent, their portrayals are sometimes reductive or stereotypical. The current study intends to investigate the intricate and subtle portrayals of Muslims, as well as the underlying ideas that affect these representations. A qualitative study design was used, with five passages carefully chosen from Falling Man. The study adopts an eclectic paradigm that examines text, discourse practice, and sociocultural practice by combining Fairclough’s (2003) three-dimensional framework with Van Dijk’s critical discourse analysis and manipulation method (2006). The findings show that the non-Muslim character’s speech uses specific narrative and discursive tactics to obfuscate Muslims’ genuine experiences, maintaining dominant preconceptions while occasionally upsetting them. The analysis reveals that the portrayal of Muslims in Falling Man is multifaceted and challenges popular prejudices. Finally, the novel uses discourse analysis to show the relationship between language, identity, and power, offering a critical evaluation of society’s opinions of Muslims and the larger political framework in which they operate.
References
Alazzany, M., Alaghbary, G., & Al-Nakeeb, O. (2015). Linguistic approaches to ideology: Review of work between 1979 and 2010. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(1). DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.1
Baker, P. & Ellece, S. (2011). Key Terms in Discourse Analysis. London: Continuum.
Billig, M. (2003). Critical discourse analysis and the rhetoric of critique. In G. Weiss & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical discourse analysis: Theory and interdisciplinarity (pp. 35-46). Palgrave Macmillan.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, D., & Kulick, D. (2006). The language and sexuality reader. Routledge.
Colebrook, C. (2004). Irony. London and New York: Routledge.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the marketization of public discourse: The universities. Discourse & Society, 4(2),133-168.
Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In Discourse as Social Interaction, Vol.2. Van Dijk, T. (ed.) 258-84. London: Sage. https://books.google.iq/books?id
Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and Power (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge.
Gallie, W. B. (1956). Essentially contested concepts. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 56, 167-198.
Gee, J. P. (1999, 2005, 2011). An Introduction to Discourse Analysis. New York and London: Routledge; Taylor and Francis Group.
Hart, C. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis and Cognitive Sociology. Discourse & Society, 21(2), 243-265.
Hussein, J. Q., & Abdullah, I. H. (2016). The Role of Cognitive Context in the Interpretation of Riddles: A Relevance Theory Perspective. Pertanika Journal of Social Science Humanities, 24(S), 11 – 20.
Kareem, H. H. (2019). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Terrorism News in American and Arabic Newspapers. (Master’s thesis). Wasit University: College of Education for Human Sciences.
Kress, G. (1991). Communication and culture: An introduction. New South Wales University Press.
Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A Radical View. Palgrave Macmillan.
Madrid, R. (2012). The rise of ethnic politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Partridge, B. (2012). Discourse analysis: An introduction. Bloomsbury.
Richardson, J. (2007). Analyzing Newspapers: An Approach from Critical Discourse Analysis. Palgrave Macmillan.
Sameer, I.H., Abd-Razaq, G.M. (2020). International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), pp. 2059–2067.
Sameer, I.H., Majeed, W.A. (2019). Opcion, 35(Special Issue 20), pp. 2337–2348.
Simpson, P. (2004). Stylistics: A resource book for students. Routledge.
Subramanian, G. (2008). Ideological stylistics and fictional discourse [electronic resource] by Ganakumaran Subramaniam. Cambridge Scholars.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1984). Prejudice in discourse: An analysis of ethnic prejudice in cognition and conversation. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1985a). Introduction: Levels and Dimensions of Discourse Analysis in T. A.
Van Dijk. (ed.) Handbook of Discourse Analysis. London: Academic Press, (C.5.), Vol. 3., pp. 1-11.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1979). Recalling and Summarizing Complex Discourse (pp. 49-118). De Cruyte.
Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Racism and the Press. London: Routledge.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1993). ‘Principles of critical discourse analysis’. In Discourse and Society, 4(2), 129-283.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1995a). Ideological discourse analysis. In E. Ventola & A. Solin (Eds.), Interdisciplinary Approaches to Discourse Analysis (pp. 135-161). Elsevier.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, Power and Access. Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). Opinions and Ideologies in the Press. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (1998). Approaches to Media Discourse. (pp. 21-62). Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Sage Publications.
Van Dijk, T. (2000a). New(s) Racism: A Discourse Analytical Approach. In: Cottle, S., Ed., Ethnic Minorities and the Media, Open University Press, Philadelphia, 211-226.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2001b). Critical discourse analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (Eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352-371). Blackwell.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2003). The Discourse-Knowledge Interface. In G. Weiss, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 85-109). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, Ideology, and Discourse. Research Gate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/30404134
Van Dijk, T. A. (2009). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Methods of critical discourse analysis, 2(1), 62-86.
Van Dijk, T. (2011). Discourse, knowledge, power and politics. Barcelona: John Benjamins.
Van Dijk, T. (2012). Ideology and Discourse a Multidisciplinary Introduction. Barcelona.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2014a). Discourse and knowledge: A sociocognitive approach. Cambridge University Press.
Van Dijk, T. (2015a). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. Web. 8 Nov., 2016.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical discourse studies: A sociocognitive approach. In R.
Wodak & M. Meyer. (Eds.). Methods of critical discourse studies (3rd ed., pp. 63–85). SAGE Publications.
Van Dijk, T. A. (2017). Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.
Van Nieuwkerk, K. (2006). Gender, conversion, and Islam: A comparison of online and offline conversion narratives. In K. Van Nieuwkerk (Ed.), Women embracing Islam (pp. 95-119). University of Texas Press.
Wodak, R. & Meyer, M. (2001). Methods of critical discourse analysis. Sage Publications.
