Framing the Bisht: A Multimodal Analysis of Arab and Non-Arab Online Media Coverage in the 2022 World Cup Final

Authors

  • Sana’ H. Daoud The University of Jordan
  • Jihad M. Hamdan The University of Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1604.20

Keywords:

Arab and non-Arab online news sources, bisht, multimodal critical discourse analysis, Qatar World Cup 2022

Abstract

This study investigates how Arab and non-Arab online news sources covered the bisht moment during the 2022 FIFA World Cup final. The study's corpus consists of 10 English-language online news reports, evenly split: 5 from Arab and 5 from non-Arab sources, collected from their official websites, to ensure diverse cultural representation and prevent bias. Using Machin and Mayr’s (2012) Multimodal Critical Discourse Analysis (MCDA) framework and Van Dijk’s (1998) Ideological Square model, the study analyzes the corpus to explore how text and visuals were used to shape the story. The findings revealed that Arab media focused on the bisht as a symbol of pride and tradition, using positive language and images to show it as a gesture of respect and cultural importance. On the other hand, non-Arab media often described the bisht as awkward or unnecessary, highlighting controversy and ignoring much of its cultural meaning. The findings also showed that both sides framed the event differently based on their cultural perspectives. Arab media celebrated the moment, avoiding any criticism and focusing on the bisht’s rich heritage. Non-Arab media, however, highlighted its clash with Messi’s jersey, seeing it as a distraction from his amazing win. The visuals also reflected these narratives, with Arab media blending tradition and celebration, while non-Arab media leaning toward creating tension. Finally, the study highlighted how media shapes public views of cultural moments and the need for fair and balanced reporting in global events.

References

Abdelghany, S., Nayef, H., & Fawzy, R. (2023). Metaphorical representation in Egyptian and American multimodal coronavirus memes: A cyberpragmatic analysis. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 23(2), 339-368. Retrieved February 15, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v23i2.467

Alexandrovna, S., & Andreevna, N. (2025). Just war: Critical discourse analysis of US presidential speeches. International Journal of Arabic-English studies (IJAES), 25(1), 387-402. Retrieved March 10, 2025, from https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes.v25i1.604

Aley, M., & Hahn, L. (2020). The powerful male hero: A content analysis of gender representation in posters for children’s animated films. Sex Roles, 83, 499–509. Retrieved March 18, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-020-01127-z

Al-Taleb, A., & Hamdan, J. (2024). A visual analysis of male characters in Disney animated movies. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(4), 1069-1082. Retrieved May 19, 2024, from https://tpls.academypublication.com/index.php/tpls/article/view/7875

Amer, “MW”. (2024). Critical multimodal discourse analysis: A case of a Palestinian movement. An - Najah University for Research - B (Humanities), 38(1), 210-238. Retrieved July 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.35552/0247.38.1.2146

Assaiqeli, A. (2021). Palestine in visual representation: A visual semiotic analysis of the Nakba. International Journal of Arabic-English Studies, 21(1), 99-125. Retrieved April 15, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.21.1.6

Atma, S. (2023). A multimodal analysis of gender stereotypes in Algerian TV advertisements: Media depictions and consumer perceptions. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.

Baldry, A., & Thibault, P. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.

Coates, J. (2016). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. London: Routledge.

Goffman, E. (1976). Gender advertisements. Harper Torch books, Harper & Row, Publishers, New York. Retrieved April 05, 2024, from http://www.publiccollectors.org/Goffman_Gender.pdf

Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. Routledge, London.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London and New York: Routledge.

Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. Arnold; Oxford University Press.

Lyons, A. (2016). Multimodality. In Zhu Hua (ed.) Research methods in intercultural communication: A practical guide (pp. 268-280), New York: Wiley-Blackwell.

Machin, D., & Mayr, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Mostafa, R. (2018). Online newspapers portrayal of Arab female athletes in Rio 2016 Olympics: A multimodal critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Arabic-English studies (IJAES), (18), 49-70. Retrieved March 10, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.18.1.3

Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. New York: Routledge.

Onyia, P. (2023). Is investing in a football club profitable? Retrieved April 24, 2024, from https://nicholasidoko.com/blog/2023/04/27/is-investing-in-a-football-club-profitable.

Panja, T. (2022). World cup ends with Qatar taking a final victory lap. The New York Times. Retrieved April 25, 2024, from https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/18/sports/soccer/world-cup-qatar.html.

Van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles