Internet Memes and Gender: A Pragmatic Analysis of How Saudi Male and Female EFL Undergraduate Students Use Internet Memes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1604.24Keywords:
females, gender, internet memes, males, pragmatic functionsAbstract
The study examined the differences between 150 male and female EFL undergraduate students in their use of internet memes. The way in which male and female participants used internet memes was investigated. Moreover, the differences between the two genders in the pragmatic functions of the memes and the most common function by each gender were investigated. The data for the current study were gathered using a questionnaire completed by 75 male students and 75 female students. The findings suggest that both male and female participants showed a high use of memes in their private conversations with their family and friends. It also showed high use of memes for joking or humour. Male participants showed a high use of memes for entertainment or satire, whereas female participants used them to express their emotions, which was a less frequent function among males. In terms of the most common emotions expressed by males and females, male participants used memes to express happiness and joy more frequently than females, whereas female participants were more likely than males to use internet memes to express sadness, anger, love and hate. Therefore, this shows differences between males and females in the pragmatic functions of using internet memes. The majority of the male and female participants felt comfortable using memes from different cultures, although a few preferred not to because they were afraid of being misunderstood. The paper concludes with a recommendation to conduct studies on the pragmatic functions of memes by different age groups.
References
Ariyoga, M., & Rahyono, F. X. (2020). Ideational meaning and morality in the internet memes of 9gag about the interaction between teacher and students. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 9, 91–100.
Bassiouney, R. (2009). Arabic sociolinguistics. Edinburgh University Press.
Bensaber, Y. (2020). Humor and gender: Males and females’ understanding and appreciation of humor in memes and written jokes: A case study of 3rd year students of English at Frères Mentouri Constantine 1 University [Master’s thesis, University of Frères Mentouri Constantine 1 University].
Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford University Press.
Boiko, L., Stakhniuk, N., & Vladyka, S. (2024). A comparative linguistic analysis of internet memes in English, Polish and Ukrainian: Specifics, functions and language means. Multidisciplinary Science Journal, 6, 2024ss0218. https://doi.org/10.31893/multiscience.2024ss0218
Börzsei, L. K. (2013). Makes a meme instead: A concise history of Internet memes. New Media Studies Magazine, 7. Retrieved February 10, 202from http://works.bepress.com/linda_borzsei/2/
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Cichmińska, M. (2004). Spokojnie, to tylko amalgamate – “Gazeta Wyborcza”, kino i teoria amalgamatów. Prace Językoznawcze, 2004(6), 21–32.
Dancygier, B., & Vandelanotte, L. (2016). Discourse viewpoint as network. In B. Dancygier, W. Lu, & A. Verhagen (Eds.), Viewpoint and the fabric of meaning: Form and use of viewpoint tools across languages and modalities (pp. 13–40). Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110365467-003
Davis, C. B., Glantz, M., & Novak, D. R. (2016). “You can’t run your SUV on cute. Let’s go!”: Internet memes as delegitimizing discourse. Environmental Communication, 10(1), 62–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2014.991411
Davison, P. (2012). The language of internet memes. In M. Mandiberg (Ed.), The social media reader (pp. 120–134). New York University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1982) The extended phenotype. Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (1999) The selfish meme. Time, 153, 52–53.
Dawkins, R. (2006). The selfish gene (30th anniversary ed.). Oxford University Press.
Dawkins, R. (2016). The selfish gene (40th anniversary ed.). Oxford University Press.
Fauconnier, G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139174220
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. Basic Books.
Fillmore, C. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1976.tb25467.x
Gal, N., Shifman, L., & Kampf, Z. (2016). “It gets better”: Internet memes and the construction of collective identity. New Media & Society, 18(8), 1698–1714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814568784
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In Speech acts. University of California Press.
Grundlingh, L. (2018). Memes as speech acts. Social Semiotics, 28(2), 147–168.
Labov, W. (1982). Building on empirical foundations. In W. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory) (pp. 17–92). John Benjamin Publishers.
Malik, A., & Tehseen, Z. (2022). Pragmatic analysis of internet memes on distant learning. Pakistan Journal of Society, Education and Language, 8(2), 303–317.
Marcus, O. R., & Singer, M. (2017). Loving Ebola-chan: Internet memes in an epidemic. Media, Culture & Society, 39(3), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443716646174
Markowski, M. (2022). Pragmatics of irony and post irony in internet memes [Master’s thesis, Jagiellonian University].
Milner, R. M. (2016). The world made meme: Public conversations and participatory media. MIT Press.
Nissenbaum, A., & Shifman, L. (2017). Internet memes as contested cultural capital: The case of 4chan’s /b/ board. New Media & Society, 19(4), 483–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444815609313
Ostanina-Olszewska, J., & Majdzińska-Koczorowicz, A. (2019). A cognitive linguistics approach to internet memes on selected Polish internet sites. Cognitive Studies | Études cognitives, 2019(19). https://doi.org/ 10.11649/cs.1939
Shifman, L. (2014). Memes in digital culture. MIT Press.
Smith, S. (2021). What do you meme? An analysis of how college students at Central Washington University use memes [Master’s thesis, Central Washington University].
Trudgill, P. (1983). On dialect: Social and geographical perspectives. Blackwell.
Vasquez, C., & Aslan, E. (2021) “Cats be outside, how about meow”: Multimodal humor and creativity in an internet meme. Journal of Pragmatics, 171, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.10.006
Wiggins, B. E. (2022). Memes and the media narrative. In C. Xie (Ed.), The pragmatics of internet memes (pp. 64–84). John Benjamins.
Yus, F. (2019). Multimodality in memes: A cyberpragmatic approach. In P. Bou-Franch & P. G. C. Blitvich (Eds.), Analyzing digital discourse: New insights and future directions (pp. 105–132). Palgrave Macmillan.
Xie, C. (2022). The pragmatics of internet memes (Benjamin’s Current Topics). John Benjamins.
Xie, C., Yus, F., & Haberland, H. (2021). Introduction: Approaching internet pragmatics. In C. Xie, Approaches to internet pragmatics: Theory and practice (pp. 1–23). John Benjamins.
