Omani EFL Students' and Their Teachers' Perceptions of Written Corrective Feedback

Authors

  • Rawan Al-Jadeedi Ministry of Education
  • Fatema Al-Rubai’ey Sultan Qaboos University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1702.03

Keywords:

written corrective feedback, error correction, teacher-learner engagement, L2 writing, Online teaching and learning

Abstract

This study examines the EFL teachers' and students' perceptions of the effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) in the EFL context. The data was collected from 104 male and female students and 11 professors at Sultan Qaboos University in Oman. Two questionnaires, one for students and one for professors, were used to collect quantitative data and some qualitative data. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the quantitative data, and thematic analysis was used to analyze the qualitative data. The participants agree on the provision of selective, mid-focused, rather than comprehensive WCF. They prefer a focus on a group of categories of errors rather than flooding the students with feedback on all types of errors. Unlike previous research, the EFL students and their teachers do not solely prioritize accuracy issues over content-focused feedback. The EFL students affirm that they are not seeking error-free writing but rather effective communication of their ideas. In addition, the students perceive the student-teacher engagement with feedback via discussion as an essential pedagogical practice to maximize their WCF uptake. The study confirms the ecological nature of WCF by calling attention to the methodological variable of oral feedback scaffolding strategies that might affect the effectiveness of WCF but go unnoticed in WCF studies.

Author Biography

Fatema Al-Rubai’ey, Sultan Qaboos University

Department of English and Translation

References

Akponah, P., Hassen, H., & Higgins, M. (2024). An Exploration of Dialogue to Promote Assessment Feedback Literacy. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 12, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.12.21

AlBakri, S. (2015). Written corrective feedback: Teachers’ beliefs, practices and challenges in an Omani context. Arab Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 44–73. https://www.arjals.com/ajal/article/view/44

Al Kharusi, F. M., & Al-Mekhlafi, A. M. (2019). The practice of teachers' written corrective feedback as perceived by EFL teachers and supervisors. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(6), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n6p120

Al-Rubai’ey, F., & Nassaji, H. (2013). Direct and indirect metalinguistic feedback: A matter of suitability rather than superiority. In A. Mahmoud & R. Al-Mahrooqi (Eds.), Issues in Teaching and Learning English as Foreign in the Arab World (pp. 28–43). Sultan Qaboos University Press, Oman.

Amrhein, H. R., & Nassaji, H. (2010). Written corrective feedback: What do students and teachers think is right and why? Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(2), 95–127.

Aseeri, F. M. M. (2019). Written corrective feedback as practiced by instructors of writing in English at Najran University. Journal of Education and Learning, 8(3), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v8n3p112

Atmaca, Ç. (2016). Contrasting perceptions of students and teachers: Written corrective feedback. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 12(2), 166–182.

Bitchener, J. (2008). Evidence in support of written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, 102–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.11.004

Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten-month investigation. Applied Linguistics, 31(2), 193–214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Brown, D. (2012). The written corrective feedback debate: Next steps for classroom teachers and practitioners. TESOL Quarterly, 46(4), 861–867. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.63

Brown, D., Liu, Q., & Norouzian, R. (2023). Effectiveness of written corrective feedback in developing L2 accuracy: A Bayesian meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research, 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688221147374

Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: A case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0010-y

Evans, N. W., Hartshorn, K. J., McCollum, R. M., & Wolfersberger, M. (2010). Contextualizing corrective feedback in second language writing pedagogy. Language Teaching Research, 14(4), 445–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688103753

Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? (And what do we do in the meantime…?). Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005

Ferris, D. R. (2010). Second language writing research and written corrective feedback in SLA: Intersections and practical applications. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 181–201. http://doi:10.1017/S0272263109990490

Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage Publications Limited.

Fitriyah, I., Ningrum, A. S. B., & Gozali, I. (2024). An Investigation of Written Corrective Feedback in EFL Writing Assessment: How Teachers' Feedback Practices Meet Students' Expectations. International Journal of Language Testing, 14(1), 166-184. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijlt.2023.411616.1275

Han, Y. (2019). Written corrective feedback from an ecological perspective: The interaction between the context and individual learners. System, 80, 288–303. http://doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.12.009

Jiang, L., & Yu, S. (2021). Understanding changes in EFL teachers’ feedback practice during COVID-19: Implications for teacher feedback literacy at a time of crisis. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 509–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-021-00583-9

Jwa, S. (2025). Written feedback dialogue: A cyclical model for student engagement with feedback. TESOL Quarterly, 59(2), 1024-1035. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3365

Kang, E., & Han, Z. (2015). The efficacy of written corrective feedback in improving L2 written accuracy: A meta‐analysis. The Modern Language Journal, 99(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12189

Karim, K., & Nassaji, H. (2015). ESL students’ perceptions of written corrective feedback: What type of feedback do they prefer and why? The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 4(1), 5–26.

Lee, I. (2017). Working hard or working smart: Comprehensive versus focused written corrective feedback in L2 academic contexts. In J. Bitchener, N. Storch, & R. Wette (Eds.), Teaching writing for academic purposes to multilingual students: Instructional approaches (pp. 182–194). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315269665

Li, S. (2017). Student and teacher beliefs and attitudes about oral corrective feedback. In H. Nassaji & E. Kartchava (Eds.), Corrective feedback in second language teaching and learning (pp. 143–157). New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315621432

Lim, S. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Efficacy of Written Corrective Feedback in Writing Instruction: A Meta-Analysis. TESL-EJ, 24(3), 1–26.

Mao, S. S., & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Written corrective feedback: (Mis)alignment of teachers’ beliefs and practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.05.004

Mao, Z., & Lee, I. (2020). Feedback scope in written corrective feedback: Analysis of empirical research in L2 contexts. Assessing Writing, 45, 100469. https://doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100469

Mao, Z., Lee, I., & Li, S. (2024). Written corrective feedback in second language writing: A synthesis of naturalistic classroom studies. Language Teaching, Advance online publication, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444823000393

Myers, T., & Buchanan, J. (2025). Dialogism in feedback literacies: a critical review. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2025.2478159

Polio, C., Fleck, C., & Leder, N. (1998). “If I only had more time”: ESL learners' changes in linguistic accuracy on essay revisions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(1), 43-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(98)90005-4

Shen, R., & Chong, S. W. (2022). Learner engagement with written corrective feedback in ESL and EFL contexts: A qualitative research synthesis using a perception-based framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(3), 276–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2022.2072468

Trabelsi, S. (2019). The perceptions and preferences of the general foundation programme students regarding written corrective feedback in an Omani EFL Context. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 10(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.10n.1p.91

Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46(2), 327–369.

Yoke, S. K., Rajendran, C. B., Sain, N., Kamaludin, P. N. H., Nawi, S. M., & Yusof, S. (2013). The use of online corrective feedback in academic writing by L1 Malay learners. English Language Teaching, 6(12), 175–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n12p175

Yu, S., Geng, F., Liu, C., & Zheng, Y. (2021a). What works may hurt: The negative side of feedback in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 54, 100850. https://doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100850

Yu, S., Zheng, Y., Jiang, L., Liu, C., & Xu, Y. (2021b). “I even feel annoyed and angry”: Teacher emotional experiences in giving feedback on student writing. Assessing Writing, 48, 100528. https://doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100528

Zaccaron, R., & Xhafaj, D. C. (2020). Knowing me, knowing you: A comparative study on the effects of anonymous and conference peer feedback on the writing of learners of English as an additional language. System, 95, 102367–102313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102367

Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021). EFL Students' Preferences for Written Corrective Feedback: Do Error Types, Language Proficiency, and Foreign Language Enjoyment Matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 660564. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.660564

Zhang, Z., & Hyland, K. (2018). Student engagement with teacher and automated feedback on L2 writing. Assessing Writing, 36, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.02.004

Zheng, Y., & Yu, S. (2018). Student engagement with teacher written corrective feedback in EFL writing: A case study of Chinese lower-proficiency students. Assessing Writing, 37, 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.001

Downloads

Published

2026-03-02

Issue

Section

Articles