The Dynamics of Readers’ Reception of the Novel Habibie & Ainun Among University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1702.19Keywords:
biographical novels, literary reception, politics, socio-culture, studentsAbstract
This study examined the reception of the novel Habibie & Ainun (2010) using Jauss' literary reception theory, focusing on how readers from different cultural and linguistic backgrounds interpret biographical prose fiction. Employing a mixed-method approach, this research involved 145 students from universities in Indonesia, including Manado State University, Makassar State University, Republic of Indonesia Teachers Association Wiranegara University, and Timor University. Data were collected through surveys with both qualitative and quantitative elements and analyzed using Jamovi and NVivo software. Findings revealed that factors such as personal experience, historical context, and generational differences shape how readers interpret the novel. The majority of readers (58%) brought preset expectations, aligning with the concept of the readers' horizon of expectations. While most readers felt emotionally connected to the characters, younger readers struggled to personally identify with them due to a lack of direct experience with the historical context. Nonetheless, universal themes like love and sacrifice resonated strongly. This research supports the SDGs by enriching literary literacy studies in historical and cultural contexts and promoting literary accessibility for diverse reader groups.
References
Adugna, A. B. (2025). “A wife is the earth itself”: Women and nature as parallel victims in Barbara Kingsolver’s The Poisonwood Bible. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101351
Alblooshi, F., & Alasfour, A. (2025). Translators’ paratextual visibility and the functions of paratexts: A mixed-methods study. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101362
Appio, F., Michaud, T., Vint, S., & Yaszek, L. (2025). Science fiction and the quest for innovation. Technovation, 141, 103172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2025.103172
Banou, C. (2025). Chapter 3 - Converged aesthetics: Personalized publishing services. In The Visual Identity of the Book: From the Renaissance to the Digital Age (pp. 121–157). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-443-19167-1.00003-6
Beach, R. (2025). Adopting a languaging approach for teaching about the climate crisis in English language arts. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 24(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-05-2024-0067
Calafato, R., & Simmonds, K. (2022). Linkages between literary response, aesthetic competence, and literary competence in the EFL classroom. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 75, 101214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101214
Courret, L. (2024). Deleuze and Guattari as readers of Freud. L’Évolution Psychiatrique, 89(4), e61–e72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evopsy.2024.10.001
Dahlberg-Dodd, H. E. (2025). Mock foreigner speech and the reification of mediatized (white) foreignness in Japanese media. Language & Communication, 101, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2025.01.001
Della Sala, S., Edgar, K., Goldberg, E., & Catani, M. (2025). Aleksander Luria and Oliver Sacks: An inspiring correspondence. Cortex, 184, 298–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2025.01.010
Dey, D., & Tripathi, P. (2024). ‘Robbed out of mind’: Reflections on Alzheimer’s and gendered subjectivity in select Indian literary narratives. Journal of Aging Studies, 68, 101211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101211
Enciso, P., & Krone, B. (2023). Literature: critical imagination and young adult readers remaking worlds. In R. Tierney, F. Rizvi, & K. Ercikan (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Education (4th ed., pp. 337–345). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-818630-5.07051-2
Granqvist, A. (2024). Creating a safe house for active literary book-group discussions in a contact zone classroom. Linguistics and Education, 83, 101335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101335
Gulya, N., & Fehérvári, A. (2023). The impact of literary works containing characters with disabilities on students’ perception and attitudes towards people with disabilities. International Journal of Educational Research, 117, 102132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.102132
Habibie, B. J. (2010). Habibie & Ainun. THC Mandiri.
Hiidenmaa, P., Lindh, I., Linko, M., Suomalainen, R., & Tossavainen, T. (2024). Reading culture as shared ethos: A study of Finnish self-identified readers. Poetics, 105, 101912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101912
Hjellbrekke, J., Halvorsen, P. C., Jakobsen, K. A., & Arneberg, S. (2025). Literary practices, capital structures and political position-taking: The Norwegian writers during World War II. Poetics, 109, 101981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2025.101981
Holland, K. (2007). Literary Contexts of Triangular Desire: Natal’ja and Aleksandr Gercen as Readers of George Sand. Russian Literature, 61(1), 175–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruslit.2007.01.022
Huang, L., & Xia, D. (2025). Chinese thanking interaction from premodern to modern China: A diachronic analysis. Language & Communication, 101, 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2024.12.013
Jones, K., Storm, S., & Corbitt, A. (2023). Literary play gone viral: delight, intertextuality, and challenges to normative interpretations through the digital serialization of Dracula. English Teaching, 22(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-08-2022-0116
Juanda, & Azis. (2023). Dolphin Conservation in Pengelana Laut Short Story: Greg Garrard’s Ecocriticism Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(9), 2303–2312. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1309.17
Juanda, J., Afandi, I., & Yunus, A. F. (2024). Digital Short Story Literacy and the Character of Environmentally Concerned Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 15(2), 415–427. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.10
Kane, B. D., Keene, K. C., & Reynolds, S. (2022). Collaborative literary reasoning as a support for preservice English language arts teachers’ learning about disciplinary literacy. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 21(1), 84–97. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-06-2021-0065
Kindler, B. (2025). Mass editing, mass writing: Experiments in collective literary production from Yan’an to the Great Leap forward. World Development, 188, 106880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2024.106880
Kuld, L., Mitchell, S., & Hellmanzik, C. (2025). Manhattan Transfer: Heterogeneous productivity effects of agglomeration in American authorship. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 111, 104061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2024.104061
LeBlanc, R. J. (2021). Doing voices: Stylization, literary interpretation, and indexical valence. Linguistics and Education, 64, 100949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100949
Lewin, B. A. (2005). Hedging: an exploratory study of authors’ and readers’ identification of ‘toning down’ in scientific texts. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2004.08.001
Lewis, W. E., & Ferretti, R. P. (2011). Topoi and literary interpretation: The effects of a critical reading and writing intervention on high school students’ analytic literary essays. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 334–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.06.001
Li, L., Wang, L., & Luo, N. (2024). Application of e-learning and artificial intelligence interactive entertainment in character analysis of literary works. Entertainment Computing, 50, 100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100671
Li, M., Zhou, D., Liu, X., & Zan, H. (2025). Simulation of E-learning virtual interaction in Chinese language and literature multimedia teaching system based on video object tracking algorithm. Entertainment Computing, 52, 100764. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100764
Liu, J., Ang, M. C., Chaw, J. K., Kor, A.-L., Ng, K. W., & Lam, M. C. (2025). Assessing the impact and development of immersive VR technology in education: Insights from telepresence, emotion, and cognition. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 213, 124024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2025.124024
Liu, Y., Zhuo, X., & Zhou, X. (2024). Multifractal analysis of Chinese literary and web novels. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 641, 129749. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2024.129749
MacLeod, N., Shelley, J., & Morrison, A. M. (2018). The touring reader: Understanding the bibliophile’s experience of literary tourism. Tourism Management, 67, 388–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.02.006
Magnifico, A. M., & Jones, K. (2025). Theorizing fanfiction: The importance of remixed social genres composed on the internet. Computers and Composition, 75, 102916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2025.102916
Malecki, W. P., Schneider-Mayerson, M., Petterson, A., Dobrowolska, M., & Thaker, J. (2025). The role of hope and fear in the impact of climate fiction on climate action intentions: Evidence from India and USA. Poetics, 108, 101960. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2024.101960
Marmorstein, M., & Shor, L. (2025). Orienting to knowledge as remarkable: The newsmark be’emet (‘in-truth’) in Hebrew conversation. Journal of Pragmatics, 238, 40–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.005
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Mrugalski, M. (2021). Teoria/Literatura as a Mise en Abyme of Digital Research on Literary Studies. The Corpus of Polish Literary Theory Between Mathematical Intuitionism and Formalism. Russian Literature, 122–123, 85–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ruslit.2021.07.005
Musachio, B. (2025). “America, I’ll Ask You in Russian”: “America” in Evgenii Evtushenko’s Cuba-Themed Poetry. Slavic Literatures. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.slalit.2025.01.001
Ortega Montero, Ó. (2025). Stories of home: Aging, intergenerational relations and dementia in Julia Martin’s The Blackridge House: A memoir (2019). Journal of Aging Studies, 73, 101321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101321
Pattee, A. (2024). Identifying the hypothetical adolescent in library and information science literature: Describing the reader constructed in recommendations of adult books for young adults. Library & Information Science Research, 46(3), 101315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2024.101315
Reynolds, T., Rush, L. S., Holschuh, J. P., & Lampi, J. P. (2022). Generating, weaving and curating: disciplinary processes for reading literary text. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 21(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-06-2021-0070
Riveiro, M. B. (2022). Revisiting Literary Value and Consecration at the Turn of the Century: The Critical Reception of César Aira’s Works in the 1980s and 1990s. Poetics, 92, 101650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101650
Rossi, F., Baines, N., & Wilson, E. (2025). Generating societal impact from collaborations between universities and arts and culture organisations (ACOs): Evidence from a survey of arts and culture professionals in the UK. Technovation, 140, 103158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2024.103158
Shen, Y. (2024). Is a New Chinese Literary History Possible? A Critical Investigation of The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature. Journal of Chinese Humanities, 10(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/23521341-12340171
Soto-Sanfiel, M. T., Angulo-Brunet, A., & Saha, S. (2025). Deepfakes as narratives: Psychological processes explaining their reception. Computers in Human Behavior, 165, 108518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108518
Storm, S., & Rainey, E. C. (2024). Form, criticality, and humanity: topic modeling the field of literary studies for English education. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 23(3), 388–403. https://doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-01-2024-0012
Storni, M. (2025). Resisting Newton in provincial France, 1750s–1770s: Opposition from the margins to the Parisian academic community. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 109, 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2024.12.004
Strandberg, A., & van Rijt, J. (2024). Grammatical and rhetorical reasoning in upper secondary students’ collaborative talk about a literary text. Linguistics and Education, 84, 101359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2024.101359
Swetha, M., & Aravind, B. R. (2025). “Language as power: Analyzing the intersection of linguistics and politics in Ijeoma Oluo’s work.” Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11, 101405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101405
Tevdovska, E. S. (2016). Literature in ELT Setting: Students Attitudes and Preferences Towards Literary Texts. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.041
Tosi, G., Bonali, N., & Romano, D. (2024). Finding oneself in someone else’s shoes: The role of perspective in literary texts. Consciousness and Cognition, 125, 103767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2024.103767
Vizcaíno, V. (2025). Exploring sexual liberation in middle age: An intersectional analysis of homosexual women in Jackie Kay’s short stories. Journal of Aging Studies, 72, 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2025.101307
Wang, B., Shi, Q., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Zeng, W., & Wang, Z. (2025). EmotionLens: Interactive visual exploration of the circumplex emotion space in literary works via affective word clouds. Visual Informatics, 9(1), 84-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visinf.2025.02.003
Xu, Z. (2024). Musings on Literary History Research: The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature as a Case Study. Journal of Chinese Humanities, 10(1), 6–26. https://doi.org/10.1163/23521341-12340168
Xue, Y. (2025). The transpacific flow: Creative writing programs in China, Jin Peng. Asian Journal of Social Science, 53(1), 100186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajss.2025.100186
Zhang, P. (2023). New Media, New Literary Theory, and New Literature from an Interological Horizon. Signs and Media, 2(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1163/25900323-12340020
Zhukova, M. A., Chinn, L. K., Cheek, C., Sukmanova, A. A., Kustova, T. A., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2025). Impact of maternal institutionalization on children’s language development: A multidisciplinary study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 253, 106197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2025.106197
