The Metaphorical Interpretation of English and Chinese Body-part Idioms Based on Relevance Theory

Authors

  • Fangfang Di Shanxi Normal University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1205.24

Keywords:

Relevance Theory, conceptual metaphor, body-part idioms

Abstract

As a special language coding way and language phenomenon, metaphor is an important form when humans use language in communication. However, metaphorical mappings are not arbitrary. They are based on our physical experience of the world around us. Idioms are the crystallization of human language and culture and play an important role in human communication. The idiomatic meaning is not simply the sum of the lexical meanings, but often the metaphorical meaning extended from the literal meaning. The paper is based on the relevance theory proposed by Sperber and Wilson (1995), adopts the methods of comparative analysis and text analysis, and takes the idioms of “body metaphor” contained in English and Chinese as the main research object to explore the following questions: 1. What is the interpretation model of the “body-part metaphors” in idioms? 2. In English and Chinese idioms, what are the similarities and differences in the use and interpretation of body-part metaphors? Firstly, the idioms of body-part metaphor are classified based on their projection types, then analyzing the projection methods of each type. Finally, through the new reasoning model guided by relevance theory to analyze the reasoning process of body-part metaphor in English and Chinese idioms, exploring the importance of cognitive context in the interpretation of body-part idioms.

References

Carston, R. (2012). Metaphor, ad hoc concepts, and word meaning: More Questions than Answers.In: Hanks, P. (Ed.). Metaphor and figurative language. London: Routledge.

Chen Shuting. (2020). The Cultural Understanding of Metaphor: Taking the Body Metaphor Between English and Chinese as an Example. Journal of Chengdu Normal University, 4, 91-95.

Clark, B. (2013). Relevance Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chen Xinren. (1998). Mind and Relevance. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, 7, 17-19.

Gibbs, R. W. & M. Tendale. (2006). Cognitive effort and efforts in metaphor comprehension: relevance theory and psycholinguistics. Mind and Language, 3, 379-403.

Harper, C. (2018). Collins English Dictionary. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.

Hao Jingjiang. & L. Jing. (2013). Xinhua Idiom Dictionary. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Levinson, S.C.(1989). A review of Relevance. Journal of Linguistics, 2, 455-472.

Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lanchun. (1999). A Study of Chinese Spatial Metaphor Based on Cognitive Perspective. Foreign Language Teaching and Study, 4,7-15.

Lu Weizhong. (2003). The Cognitive features of Body Metaphor. Foreign Language Teaching. 6,23-28.

Lv Shuxiang. & Ding Shengshu. (2016). Modern Chinese Dictionary. Beijing: The Commercial Press.

Luo Zhufeng. (2010). The Great Chinese Dictionary. Beijing: The Great Chinese Dictionary Press.

Qin Xiubai. (2000). A dictionary of contemporary English idioms. Tianjin: Tianjin Science and Technology Press.

Sperber, D. & Wilson. D. (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.

Wang Tiemei. (2020). A Comparison and Analysis Between English and Chinese on the Construction ways of Body Metaphor. Journal of Changchun University of Science and Technology (Social Sciences Edition), 1, 139-142.

Wang Caili. (2002). An analysis of Cognitive Process Through the Noun Body Metaphor. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching, 4, 104 -106.

Downloads

Published

2021-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles