Reflexives and Reciprocals in English and Modern Standard Arabic: An Investigation and a Comparison
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1206.12Keywords:
reflexives, reciprocals, Binding Theory, locative possessiveAbstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate the typology of reflexives and reciprocals in English and MSA, which is a variety of standardized, literary Arabic used throughout Arab countries. It has shown that MSA morphologically encoded reflexives and reciprocals are in fact syntactically and semantically asymmetrical. It will be argued that morphologically encoded reflexives do not project an anaphor (an internal argument) syntactically and their morphological marker semantically serves as a reflexivizer, whereas morphologically encoded reciprocals do project an anaphor syntactically, realized either overtly or covertly. Concerning the distribution of such anaphor, the paper elucidates the admissible and in admissible environments. It is argued that MSA does not allow possessive reflexives, but allow possessive reciprocals such as the construct-state, whether it be a noun phrase or a locative prepositional phrase. This variation is accounted for by assuming that reciprocals occupy Spec of DP and therefore can be bound by an NP from a higher phase, whereas reflexives occupy a position lower than the D head and thus must be bound within their DP phase. Finally yet importantly, MSA override reflexives and reciprocals unlike their English counterparts, are always subject to the Principle A of the Binding Theory.
References
Bošković, Ž. (2005). On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia linguistica, 59(1), 1-45.
Carnie, A. (2012). Syntax: A generative introduction (Vol. 18). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on Government and Binding (Dordrecht: Foris). Studies in generative grammar, 9.
Chomsky, N. (2000). Minimalist inquiries: The framework (MITOPL 15). Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik, 89-155.
Despić, M. (2015). Phases, reflexives, and definiteness. Syntax, 18(3), 201-234.
Dimitriadis, A. (2008). Irreducible symmetry in reciprocal constructions. In E. König & V. Gast (Ed.), Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations (pp. 375-410). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199147.375
Dimitriadis, A., & Everaert, M. (2014). How many theta roles in a reflexive verb? Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 61(3), 247-269.
Gaby, A. (2008). Distinguishing reciprocals from reflexives in Kuuk Thaayorre: In E. König & V. Gast (Ed.), Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations (pp. 259-288). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199147.259
Heine, B. & Miyashita, H. (2008). The intersection between reflexives and reciprocals: A grammaticalization perspective: In E. König & V. Gast (Ed.), Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations (pp. 169-224). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199147.169
Huddleston, R. & Pullum, G. (2005). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik, 53(2), 193-194. https://doi.org/10.1515/zaa-2005-0209
Kemmer, S. (1993). The middle voice (Vol. 23). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins
König, E., & Siemund, P. (2000). Locally free self-forms, logophoricity, and intensification in English. English Language & Linguistics, 4(2), 183-204.
Koster, J., & Reuland, E. (Eds.). (1991). Long distance anaphora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ndimele, O. M. (1999). A first course on morphology and syntax. Port Harcourt: M. and J. Grand Orbit Communications.
Parker, F., Riley, K., & Meyer, C. F. (1990). Untriggered reflexive pronouns in English. American Speech, 65(1), 50-69.
Quirk, R. (2010). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. England: Pearson Education India.
Radford, A. (2004). Minimalist syntax: Exploring the structure of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rákosi, G. (2008). The inherently reflexive and the inherently reciprocal predicate in Hungarian: Each to their own argument structure. In E. König & V. Gast (Ed.), Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations (pp. 411-450). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199147.411
Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic inquiry, 24(4), 657-720.
Reinhart, T., & Siloni, T. (2005). The lexicon-syntax parameter: Reflexivization and other arity operations. Linguistic inquiry, 36(3), 389-436.
Siloni, T. (2008). The Syntax of Reciprocal Verbs: An Overview: In E. König & V. Gast (Ed.), Reciprocals and Reflexives: Theoretical and Typological Explorations (pp. 451-498). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199147.451
Siloni, T. (2012). Reciprocal verbs and symmetry. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, 30(1), 261-320.
Sørensen, S., (2019). Override Reflexive Pronouns in English and Danish: An investigation and comparison [Master’s thesis, Aarhus University] Retrieved from: https://tildeweb.au.dk/au132769/papers/Soerensen-2019-MA-diss-Override-Reflexives-in-English-and-Danish.pdf (accessed 29/10/2020).
Stern, N. (2004). The semantic unity of reflexive, emphatic, and other-self pronouns. American speech, 79(3), 270-280.
Wright, W., & Caspari, C. P. (2011). A grammar of the Arabic language. New York: Cosimo, Inc..
Zribi-Hertz, A. (1989). Anaphor binding and narrative point of view: English reflexive pronouns in sentence and discourse. Language, 65(4), 695-727.
