Finnish University Students’ Views of the Strengths of Foreign Language Courses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1303.01Keywords:
adult language learning, higher education, language course, languages other than EnglishAbstract
Compared with younger language learners, adult learners are assumed to have greater difficulty with language learning, for instance, in reaching native-like proficiency. Most studies in the area of second language acquisition and foreign language education have focused on younger learners, with the research on adult language learning being very limited. Through an analysis of previous studies on adult language learning and small-scale empirical research, this article examines students’ views of the strengths and good practices of foreign language courses in university language courses other than English. The questionnaire data collected from university students (N = 53) learning French, German and Italian as L3/L4 at the language centre of a Finnish university were analysed in a qualitative and quantitative way. The strongest evidence from our study was the indispensable role of teachers in university language courses. The analysis results indicate a mismatch between teacher-led and student-centred pedagogy. On the one hand, adult learners seemed to need strong guidance from the teacher, yet on the other hand, the best practices in the courses were those activities in which the adult learners could produce the target language in interactions with their peers. Finally, the factors that enhance adult language learning in higher education are reflected upon.
References
Bialystok, E. & Miller, B. (1999). The problem of age in second-language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and cognition 2(2), 127–145.
Birdsong, D. (2014). Dominance and age in bilingualism. Applied Linguistics 35(4), 374–392.
Borg, S. & Burns, A. (2008). Integrating grammar in adult TESOL classrooms. Applied Linguistics 29(3), 456–482
Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by Principle: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (3rd ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
DeKeyser, R. (2013). Age effects in second language learning: Stepping stones toward better understanding. Language Learning 63, 52–67.
DeKeyser, R., I. Alfi-Shabtay & Ravid, R. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 31(3), 413–438.
DeKeyser, R. & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean. In J. F. Kroll & A. M. B de Groot (Eds.), Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. (pp. 88–108). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dörnyei, Z. (1994). Motivation and motivating in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal 78(3), 273–284.
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational Strategies in the Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elias, J. L. & Merriam, S.B. (2005). Philosophical foundations of adult education. Malabar, FL: Krieger.
Ellis, R. (2002). The Place of Grammar Instruction in the Second/Foreign Language Curriculum. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New Perspectives on Grammar Teaching in Second Language Classrooms (pp. 17–34). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Ellis, R., Loewen, S. & Basturkmen, H. (1999). Focusing on form in the classroom. University of Auckland, Institute of Language Teaching and Learning.
FNBE [Finnish National Board of Education]. (2016). National Core Curriculum for Basic Education 2014. Helsinki: Finnish National Board of Education.
Granena, G. & Long, M. H. (2013). Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29(3), 311–343.
Guglielman, E. (2012). The ageing brain: Neuroplasticity and lifelong learning. eLearning Papers 29, 1–7.
Hakuta, K., Bialystok E. & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological science 14(1), 31–38.
Ioup, G. (2005). Age in second language development. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 419–436). New York, London: Routledge.
Johnson, S. M. (2015). Adult Learning in the Language Classroom. Bristol: Channel View Publications.
Kangasvieri, T. (2019). L2 motivation in focus: the case of Finnish comprehensive school students. The Language Learning Journal 47(2), 188–203.
Krashen, S. D., Long, M. A. & Scarcella, R.C. (1979). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly 13(4), 573–582.
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). The biological foundations of language. Hospital Practice 2(12), 5–67.
Long, M. H. (1990). Maturational constraints on language development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 12(3), 251–285.
Long, M. (2005). Problems with supposed counter-evidence to the Critical Period Hypothesis. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 43(4), 287–317.
Maijala, M., Pagèze, J. & Hoskins, L. (2018). What happens when students do tasks? A comparative, reflective study of student-centred activities in foreign-language classrooms in higher education. Scottish Languages Review 34. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6882605.
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language 55(3), 381–401.
McKay, H. & Tom, A. (1999). Teaching adult second language learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Murray, D. E. (2005). ESL in Adult Education. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. New York, London: Routledge, 65–84.
Nikolov, M. (2009). The age factor in context. In M. Nikolov (ed.), The Age Factor and Early Language Learning (pp. 1–38). Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Nunan, D. (2005). Classroom Research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning (pp. 225–240). New York, London: Routledge.
Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity, and educational change. London: Longman.
Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M.E. (1995). Adults' language learning strategies in an intensive foreign language program in the United States. System 23.3, 359–386.
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. John Benjamins Publishing.
Pitkänen, K. K. (2018). From a reader/listener to a speaker/writer: Student views confirm the need to develop English courses further towards productive, interactive skills. Language Learning in Higher Education 8(2), 445–468.
Ramírez Gómez, D. (2016). Language Teaching and the Older Adult: The Significance of Experience. Bristol, Blue Ridge Summit: Multilingual Matters.
Roberts, C. & Baynham, M. (2006). Introduction to the special issue: Research in adult ESOL. Linguistics and Education 17(1), 1–5.
Strauss, A. L. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, Calif.: Sage.
Tomlinson, B., Dat, B., Masuhara, H. & Rubdy, R. (2001). EFL courses for adults. ELT Journal 55(1), 80–101.
Wagner, E. (2015). Survey Research. In Paltridge & A. Phakiti (Eds.), Research Methods in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Resource (pp. 83–99). Bloomsbury Publishing.
