Metacognitive Knowledge in Performing a Speaking Task: A Report From High and Low Proficient Thai University Students

Authors

  • Thiwaporn Thawarom King Mongkut’s University of Technology
  • Jeffrey D. Wilang King Mongkut’s University of Technology
  • Wareesiri Singhasiri Khon Kaen University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1303.17

Keywords:

metacognitive knowledge, speaking task, vocabulary use, university students

Abstract

This study analyzes the use of metacognitive knowledge in performing a speaking task between high-proficient and low-proficient university students. The data was collected by employing stimulated recall interviews from 34-first year students. The data was coded deductively by using metacognitive knowledge frameworks. The results showed that the students employed all types of metacognitive knowledge in their speaking. Both high-proficient and low-proficient students prominently manifested strategy knowledge such as vocabulary strategies, planning strategies and problem-solving strategies. However, the high-proficient students were found to use some strategies differently from the low-proficient students. The high-proficient students showed the highest percentage of task knowledge, while the low-proficient students displayed the lowest percentage. The former group clearly showed understanding of the purpose, nature and difficulty of the task, which could influence the task management. Both groups exhibited person knowledge at a low percentage. While the high-proficient students were found to depict knowledge that facilitated their learning and speaking, the low-proficient students were concerned about variables such as limited vocabulary knowledge and grammatical deficiency that inhibited their learning and speaking. The finding implies the importance of raising metacognitive knowledge to accomplish learning tasks.

Author Biographies

Thiwaporn Thawarom, King Mongkut’s University of Technology

School of Liberal Arts

Jeffrey D. Wilang, King Mongkut’s University of Technology

School of Liberal Arts

Wareesiri Singhasiri, Khon Kaen University

Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences

References

Amado Gama, C. (2005). Integrating Metacognition in Interactive Learning Environments [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Sussex.

Altıok, S., Başer, Z., & Yükseltürk, E. (2019). Enhancing metacognitive awareness of undergraduates through using an e-educational video environment. Computers & Education, 139, 129-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.010.

Burns, A. (2016). Teaching speaking: Towards a holistic approach. In 25th ETA-ROC Anniversary Conference: Epoch Making in English Language Teaching and Learning. Taiwan: Chien Tan Overseas Youth Activity Center, November. Retrieved May 29, 2020 from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anne_Burns6/publication/314545785_ Teaching_speaking_Towards_a_holistic_approach/links/58c3422e92851c0ccbf145bc/Teaching-speaking-Towards-a-holistic-approach.pdf

Burns, A. (2019). Concepts for teaching speaking in the English language classroom. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 12(1), 1-11.

Butler, D.L. & Winne, P.H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis, Review of Educational Research, 65(3), 245-281.

Cerón Sánchez, H. S., Lovos Hernández, P. A., Henríquez Girón, L. A., & Sánchez Flores, J. A. (2015). The use of metacognitive learning strategies and their influence on speaking proficiency of third-year students from the English teaching major at the Department of Foreign Languages of The University of El Salvador during the year 2014. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation] Universidad de El Salvador.

Choy, S. C., Yim, J. S. C., & Tan, P. L. (2019). Mediating effects of quality learning on metacognitive knowledge, metacognitive experience and outcomes. Issues in Educational Research, 29(1), 1-18.

Claxton, G. (2002). Building learning power. London: TLO Ltd

Coxhead, A. (2013). Vocabulary and ESP. In B. Paltridge, & S. Sarfield, (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes, (pp. 115-132). John Willey & Sons Inc.

Davies, P., & Pearse, E. (2000). Success in English Teaching: A Complete Introduction to Teaching English at Secondary School Level and Above. Oxford University Press.

Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

Droździal-Szelest, K. (2011). Oral Skills Awareness of Advanced EFL Learners. In M. M. Pawlak, E. Waniek-Klimczak, & J. Majer, (Eds.). Speaking and instructed foreign language acquisition (pp. 131-147). Multilingual Matters.

Feak, B. C. (2013). ESP and speaking, In B. Paltridge, & S. Starfield, (Eds.), The handbook of English for specific purposes (pp. 35-53). Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex.

Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.). The nature of intelligence (pp. 231–235). Erlbaum.

Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34, 906–911. https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.906

Flavell, J. H. (1981). Cognitive monitoring. In W. P. Dickson (Ed.), Children’s oral communication skills. (pp. 35-60). Academic Press.

Goh, C. C. M., Goh, C., & Burns, A. (2012). Teaching speaking. Cambridge University Press.

Hacker, D. J., Dunlosky, J., & Graesser, A C. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of metacognition in education. Taylor & Francis.

Jin, N. Y., Ling, L. Y., Tong, C. S., Sahiddan, N., Philip, A., Azmi, N. H. N., & Tarmizi, M. A. (2013). Development of the Engineering Technology Word List for vocational schools in Malaysia. International Education Research, 1(1), 43-59

Karim, I. (2019). Enhancing the Speaking Skill Using Metacognitive Strategy. LANGUA: Journal of Linguistics, Literature, and Language Education, 2(1), 23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um046v3i1p12-16

Mokhtari, K., and Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 249-259

Nation, I. S. P., (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2013). The handbook of English for specific purposes. Wiley- Blackwell.

Paquot, M. (2010). Academic vocabulary in learner writing: From extraction to analysis, Bloomsbury Publishing.

Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In B. F. Jones, & L. Idol, Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction, (pp. 15-51). Lawrence Erlbaum Association, Inc. Publisher.

Pawlak, M., Waniek-Klimczak, E., & Majer, J., (Eds.). (2011). Speaking and Instructed Foreign Language Acquisition. Multilingual Matter.

Putri, D. R. (2019). Facilitating the Development of Students’ Metacognitive Awareness in Speaking through Self-Assessment. EDULANGUE, 2(2), 90-105. https://dx.doi.org/10.20414/edulangue.v2i2.1263

Richards, J. C. (2008). Teaching listening and Speaking. Cambridge University press.

Richards, J. C. (1976).The role of vocabulary teaching, TESOL Quarterly, 10(1), 77-89.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). What’s all the fuss about metacognition. In A. H. Schoenfeld, Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education, (pp. 189-216), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Schraw, G. (2006). Knowledge: Structures and Processes. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 245–263). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Tan, Y. H., & Tan, S. C. (2010). A metacognitive approach to enhancing Chinese language speaking skills with audioblogs. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(7).1075-1089. https://dx.doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1035

Vandergrift, L. and Goh, C.C. M. (2012) A Metacognitive Approach to Listening. In L. Vandergrift, & C. C. M. Goh (Eds.), Teaching and learning Second language Listening: metacognition in Action. (pp. 80-103). Routledge.

Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning1. Applied linguistics, 19(4), 515-537. https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515

White, B., & Frederiksen, J. (2005). A theoretical framework and approach for fostering metacognitive development. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 211-223. https://dx.doi.org/10.https://dx.doi.1207/s15326985ep4004_3

Zhang, D., & Goh, C. (2006). Strategy knowledge and perceived strategy use: Singaporean students’ awareness of listening and speaking strategies. Language Awareness, 15, 199-219. https://dx.doi.org/10.2167/la342.0

Zipagan, M, N., & Lee, K, R. (2018). Korean English learners’ use of lexical bundles in speaking, The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), pp. 276-291.

Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-02

Issue

Section

Articles