Cognitive Strategies Employed in Tackling Lexical Problems in Second Language Learning: A Psycholinguistic Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1303.20Keywords:
lexical choice errors, exical retrieval strategies, error sources, interlingual errors, intralingual errorsAbstract
This study sheds light on the lexical choice difficulty encountered by advanced learners of English by analyzing the lexical choice errors committed by a group of Jordanian students majoring in English. A task was set for 40 students to translate from Arabic into English several sentences including lexical items whose specific senses restrict their use and applications in a particular context and within certain collocational patterns. The sources of the errors were identified and categorized. In backtracking the sources of the errors in each category, the study attempts to deduce the possible cognitive strategies employed by the students in dealing with a lexical choice difficulty. Hence, the study provides psycholinguistic empirical evidence on the lexical retrieval processes and strategies employed by second language (L2) learners in tackling lexical choice problems. Results of the study revealed that the students employ a range of first language (L1)-based and L2-based lexical retrieval strategies such as semantic association, semantic analogy, approximation and derivations.
References
AbiSamra, N. (2003). An analysis of errors in Arabic speakers' English writing. Retrieved on Dec 28, 2015 from: http//abisamra03.tripod.com/nada/languageaca-erroranalysis.html
Grassi, E. A., & Barker, H. B. (2010). Culturally and linguistically diverse exceptional students: Strategies for teaching and assessment. Sage.
Harley, B. (1996). Introduction: vocabulary learning and teaching in a second language. Canadian modern language review, 53(1), 3-12.
Hatch, E. M. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Newbury House Publishers, Inc., Rowley, MA 01969.
Hemchua, S., & Schmitt, N. (2006). An analysis of lexical errors in the English compositions of Thai learners. Prospect, 21 (3), 3-25.
Khuwaileh, A. (1995). Words and context in EFL. Grazer Linguistische Studien, (44), 27-36.
Kroll, J. F., & De Groot, A. M. (Eds.). (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford University Press.
Lado, R. (1964). Language teaching: a scientific approach. McGraw- Hill.
Llach, M. D. P. A. (2005). The relationship of lexical error and their types to the quality of ESL compositions: An empirical study. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (3), 45-57.
Manchon, R. M., Murphy, L., & de Larios, J. R. (2007). Lexical retrieval processes and strategies in second language writing: A synthesis of empirical research. International Journal of English Studies, 7(2), 149-174.
Naba'h, A. A. (2011). Lexical errors made by in-service English language teachers in Jordan. Damascus University Journal, 27(1), 49-75.
Richards, J. C. (2002). Longman language teaching and applied linguistics. Pearson Education.
Richards, J. C. (2015). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. Routledge.
Shormani, M. (2012). L2 acquisition in the Arab World: An empirical study of Yemeni learners' English syntactic and semantic error gravity. LAP LAMBERT Academic Publishing.
Shormani, M. (2014). Lexical choice difficulties: A psycholinguistic study towards a solution. Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics-An Open Access International Journal 4, 43-53.
Shormani, M. Q., & Sohbani, Y. A. (2012). Semantic errors committed by Yemeni university learners: Classifications and sources. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(6), 120-139.
Wehmeier, S. (2005). Oxford advanced learner's dictionary. Oxford University Press.
