When Native Speakers Meet Non-Native Speakers: A Case Study of Foreigner Talk

Authors

  • Min Hu Southwest University of Political Science & Law

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.12

Keywords:

foreigner talk, Second Language Acquisition (SLA), NS-NNS interaction, Communication Accommodation Theory (CAT), sociolinguistics

Abstract

This study was triggered by speech modification in English overseas Chinese students encounter and find puzzling. Foreigner talk (FT) is such a type of modified speech used by native speakers (NSs) in their communication with non-native speakers (NNSs) in the form of linguistic simplification and foreigner-directed communication strategies. Based on a case study between Canadian and Chinese students, this study investigated FT through natural NS-NNS conversations and surveyed participants’ views on FT. The findings go beyond illustrating the features of FT in phonology, lexicon, syntax and discourse to unfold native and non-native speakers’ opposing views on FT, a conflict caused by NSs’ and NNSs’ different communicative goals based on communication accommodation theory (CAT), a sociolinguistic framework. This study is significant because a good understanding of this conflict, understudied by existing FT research, is vital to arousing NSs’ and NNSs’ awareness of each other’s attitudes towards FT to promote mutual understanding for effective NS-NNS communication.

References

Alcon, E., Guzman, J. R. (1994). Interlanguage modifications in NS-NNS oral interactions: A study in an English and Catalan language learning context. Retrieved Dec. 2, 2021, from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/descarga/articulo/1958106.pdf

Ayuanita, K. (2013). The crucial function of foreigner talk in acquiring L2. OKARA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 7(2), 15–22.

Bobb, S. C., Mello, K., Turco, E., Lemes, L., Fernandez, E., & Rothermich, K. (2019). Second language learners’ listener impressions of foreigner-directed speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(9), 3135–3148.

Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2018). Praat: doing phonetics by computer. Version 6.0.43. Retrieved Dec. 8, 2021, from http://www.praat.org/

Canadian Bureau for International Education. (2019). International students in Canada. Retrieved Dec. 5, 2021, from https://cbie.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/International-Students-in-Canada-ENG.pdf

Coupland, N., Coupland, J., Giles, H., & Henwood, K. (1988). Accommodating the elderly: Invoking and extending a theory. Language in Society, 17(1), 1–41.

DePaulo, B. M., & Coleman, L. M. (1986). Talking to children, foreigners, and retarded adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(5), 945–959.

Dragojevic, M., Giles, H., & Gasiorek, J. (2016). Communication accommodation theory. In C. R. Berger, & M. E. Roloff (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of interpersonal communication, First Edition (pp. 1–21). John Wiley & Sons.

Ferguson, C. A. (1971). Absence of copula and the notion of simplicity: A study of normal speech, baby talk, foreigner talk and pidgins. In D. Hymes (Ed.), Pidginization and creolization of languages (pp. 141–50). Cambridge University Press.

Ferguson, C. A. (1975). Toward a characterization of English foreigner talk. Anthropological Linguistics, 17(1), 1–14. Retrieved Dec. 5, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/30027270

Ferguson, C. A. (1981). ‘‘Foreigner talk” as the name of a simplified register. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28, 9–18.

Freed, B. (1981). Foreigner talk, baby talk, native talk. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 28, 19–40.

Guan, W. (2021). The complexities and moral conflicts of Chinese students’ adaption for overseas classes. Rangsit Journal of Educational Studies, 8(1), 1–12.

Hatch, E. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Newbury House.

Hatch, E., Shapira, R., & Gough, J. (1978). “Foreigner-talk” discourse. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 39–60.

Haxton, K. J., Plana, D., Hyde, J., Edwards, M., Sedghi, G., Wright, J., Cranwell, P., & Page, E. (2019). Chinese students’ expectations versus reality when studying on a UK-China transnational chemistry degree program. New Directions in the Teaching of Physical Sciences, 14(1), 1–14.

Khanal, J., & Gaulee, U. (2019). Challenges of international students from pre-departure to post-study: A literature review. Journal of International Students, 9(2), 560–581.

Knoll, M. A., & Scharrer, L. (2008). How similar are pitch contours derived from “imaginary” student interactions to those derived from real interactions? Speech Prosody, Campinas, Brazil, 481–484.

Knoll, M. A., Uther, M., & Costall, A. (2009). Effects of low pass filtering on the judgment of vocal affect in speech directed to infants, adults and foreigners. Speech Communication, 51(3), 210–216.

Krashen, S. (1981). Second language acquisition. Second Language Learning, 3(7), 19-39.

Kudera, J. (2020). Attuning to linguistically less-fluent interlocutors: Evidence from convergence in Danish and Finnish foreigner talk. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny, 67(1), 102–123.

Liu, D. (2016). Strategies to promote Chinese international students’ school performance: Resolving the challenges in American higher education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 1–15.

Long, M. H. (1980). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. UCLA.

Long, M. H. (1981). Questions in foreigner talk discourse. Language Learning, 31(1), 137–57.

Long, M. H. (1983a). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensive input. Applied Linguistics, 4(2), 126–41.

Long, M. H. (1983b). Linguistic and conversational adjustments to non-native speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 5(2), 177–93.

Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass, & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377–93). Newbury House.

Lugrin, B., Eckstein, B., Bergmann, K., & Heindl, C. (2018). Adapted foreigner-directed communication towards virtual agents. IVA, ’18: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA, ’18) (pp. 59–64). Nov. 5-8. Sydney, NSW, Australia. ACM, New York, NY, USA. http://doi.org/10.1145/3267851.3267859

Margić, B. D. (2017). Communication courtesy or condescension? Linguistic accommodation of native to non-native speakers of English. Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, 6(1), 29–55.

Rodríguez-Cuadrado, S., Baus, C., & Costa, A. (2017). Foreigner talk through word reduction in native/non-native spoken interactions. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 419–26.

Tang, X., Collier, D. A., & Witt, A. (2018). Qualitative study on Chinese students’ perception of US university life. Journal of International Students, 8(1), 151–78.

Textor, C. (2021). Leading destinations for Chinese students studying abroad 2015 and 2021. Retrieved Dec. 6, 2021, from https://www.statista.com/statistics/1108708/china-students-preferred-destinations-for-study-abroad/

Uther, M., Knoll, M. A., & Burnham, D. (2007). Do you speak E-NG-L-I-SH? A comparison of foreigner- and infant directed speech. Speech Communication, 49(1), 2–7.

Wu, H. P., Garza, E., & Guzman, N. (2015). International student’s challenge and adjustment to college. Education Research International, 2015, 1–9.

Zhang, Y., & Mi, Y. (2010). Another look at the language difficulties of international students. Journal of Studies in international Education, 14(4), 371–88.

Zhang, X., & Zhou, M. (2021). An exploration of Chinese students’ perceived barriers to effective intercultural communication. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, 9(2), 11–31.

Zuengler, J. 1991. Accommodation in native–nonnative interactions: Going beyond the “what” to the “why” in second language research. In H. Giles, J. Coupland, & N. Coupland (Eds.), Contexts of accommodation: Developments in applied sociolinguistics (pp. 223–44). Cambridge University Press.

Zuraida, I., & Fitri, N. (2019). Foreigner talk in conversation from YouTube channel “Abroad in Japan”. English Journal Literacy UTama, 3(1), 56–65.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles