Ideational Metaphor Analysis on EFL Students’ Academic Writing

Authors

  • Arsen Nahum Pasaribu Universitas HKBP Nommensen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1304.22

Keywords:

academic writing, ideational metaphor, SFL, students' essay, writing skill

Abstract

Over the last decade, research on the quality of EFL students' English academic writing has increased. However, research on EFL students' academic writing that incorporates grammatical metaphors is regarded scarce. As such, this study seeks to elucidate the occurrences of ideational metaphors in students' academic writing essays. The qualitative descriptive method was used in this study. This research involved a total of 25 undergraduate students from the University of HKBP Nommensen Medan, Indonesia, English Department, Faculty of Language and Arts, who studied Academic Writing course in the third semester. Students were required to submit a 350-word essay on the subject "Learning Challenges during the Coronavirus Pandemic." The research's data corpus totals 10,252 words. The results indicate that the students' writings contain 281 clauses comprising the ideational metaphor. It is deemed little in comparison to the corpus's overall data set of 10,252 words. Material processes dominate the incidence of ideational metaphors, followed by mental processes, relational processes, behavioral processes, and existential processes. This finding implies that the essay structure of EFL students is unlikely to have a large proportion of solid grammatical metaphor clauses. The pedagogical implication of this research is that EFL students, lecturers, teachers, and other educational practitioners interested in teaching English academic writing should be aware of grammatical metaphors in writing texts as a proxy for the quality of scientifically academic writing.

Author Biography

Arsen Nahum Pasaribu, Universitas HKBP Nommensen

Faculty of Language and Arts

References

Al-Saadi, Z. (2020). Gender Differences in Writing: The Mediating Effect of Language Proficiency and Writing Fluency in Text Quality. Cogent Education, 7, (2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1770923

Casal, J. E. & Lee, J. J. (2019). Syntactic Complexity and Writing Quality in Assessed First-Year L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005

Chanyoo, N. (2018). Cohesive Devices and Academic Writing Quality of Thai Undergraduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9, (5), 994-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0905.13

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Continuum International Publication Groups (Second). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476765

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th Ed. University of Birmingham, U.K.: Routledge.

Khatter, S. (2019). An Analysis of the Most Common Essay Writing Errors among EFL Saudi Female Learners (Majmaah University). Arab World English Journal, 10, (3), 364-381. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.26

Kim, S. & Kessler, M. (2022). Examining L2 English University Students’ Uses of Lexical Bundles and Their Relationship to Writing Quality. Assessing Writing, 51, (1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100589

Lestari, D. M. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Writing Undergraduate Thesis at English Education Program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. Premise Journal, 9, (1), 17-29. https://fkip.ummetro.ac.id/journal/index.php/english (accessed on February 9, 2022)

Liardét, C. L. (2018). ‘As We All Know’: Examining Chinese EFL Learners’ Use of Interpersonal Grammatical Metaphor in Academic Writing. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.005

Mahmudah, M., Hajrah, H., Amir, A., & Arifin, M. A. (2018). Grammatical Metaphor in academic texts of Indonesian students' thesis. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 1, (1), 54-61. http://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v1i1.8

Marr, J. W. (2019). Making the mechanics of paraphrasing more explicit through Grammatical Metaphor. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42, (2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100783

Naghdipour, B. (2021). English Writing Pedagogy at the Crossroads: The Case of Oman. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, (2),1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100815

Nuruzzaman, M., Islam, A.B.M.S. & Shuchi, I.J. (2018). An Analysis of Errors Committed by Saudi Non-English Major Students in the English Paragraph Writing: A Study of Comparisons. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9, (1), 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.31

Özkayran, A. & Yılmaz, E. (2020). Analysis of Higher Education Students’ Errors in English Writing Tasks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11, (2), 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.2 p.48

Pasaribu, A. N., Pasaribu, T.K., Hutauruk, M.N., & Marbun, L. (2021). Error in Students' Thesis Writing: Syntactical and Morphological Error Analysis. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4, (4), 8695-8704. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2818

Pasaribu, A. N. (2021). A Common Error Analysis in Students’ English Narrative Writing. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA), 4, (2), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i2.2338

Suhadi, J. (2018). “The Adequacy of Grammatical Metaphor to Account for World Languages”. In The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, KnE Social Sciences, pages 1–14. http://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1912

Tavernier, M. (2018). Grammatical Metaphor and Grammaticalization: The Case of Metaphors of Modality. Functions of Language, 25, (1), 164–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17014.tav

Thipatdee, G. (2019). The Development of English Writing Skills Through Techniques of Sentence Skeleton and Signpost Word Analysis for English Major Students. English Language Teaching, 12, (4), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p32

To, V. (2018). Linguistic Complexity Analysis: A Case Study of Commonly-Used Textbooks in Vietnam. SAGE Open, 20, (2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018787586

Xuan, W. W. & Chen, S. (2019). A Synthesis of Research on Grammatical Metaphor: Meta-Data and Content Analysis. WORD, 65, (4), 213–233, https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2019.1670911

Yang, B. (2018). Textual Metaphor Revisited. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400502

Zhang, X., Lu, X. & Li., W. (2021). Beyond Differences: Assessing Effects of Shared Linguistic Features on L2 Writing Quality of Two Genres. Applied Linguistics, 1-9. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab007

Zhang, Y. (2018). Examining the Application of Grammatical Metaphors in Academic Writing. English Language and Literature Studies, 8, (20), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v8n2p108

Downloads

Published

2022-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles