Enhancing Reading Comprehension Skills of Prospective Teachers Using Suitable Reading Strategies

Authors

  • Arthi Manoharan VIT
  • Srinivasan Ramachandran VIT

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.06

Keywords:

academic language, reading comprehension, reading strategies

Abstract

This study focused on using appropriate reading strategies to improve the reading comprehension of prospective teachers in two teacher education colleges in the Vellore District of Tamil Nadu, India. The paper begins by introducing the importance of English language in the contemporary environment, and then highlights the significance of reading comprehension for academic purposes. Three reading strategies were employed in the experimental study. The sample size and the testing methods employed in the experiment are described in the methodology section. The statistical analysis to determine the reading comprehension skills was done with mean, paired sample t-test and co-efficient. The results confirm that the use of appropriate reading strategies enhances the reading comprehension skills of the samples.

Author Biographies

Arthi Manoharan, VIT

Department of English, School of Social Sciences & Languages

Srinivasan Ramachandran, VIT

Department of English, School of Social Sciences & Languages

References

Alshumaimeri, Y. (2011). The effects of reading method on the comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 185-195.

Arbib, M.A., (1992). Schema theory. The encyclopedia of artificial intelligence, 2, pp.1427-1443.

Attaprechakul, D. (2013). Inference Strategies to Improve Reading Comprehension of Challenging Texts. English Language Teaching, 6(3), pp.82-91.

Block, C.C. & Israel, S.E. (2005). Reading first and beyond: The complete guide for teachers and literacy coaches. Corwin Press.

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and brain sciences, 22(4), 577-660.

Charniak, E., & Johnson, M. (2005, June). Coarse-to-fine n-best parsing and maxent discriminative reranking. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL’05) (pp. 173-180).

Christen, W.L. & Murphy, T.J. (1991). Increasing Comprehension by Activating Prior Knowledge. ERIC Digest.

Cook, V. (2007). The goals of ELT. In International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 237-248). Springer, Boston, MA.

Dogan, B. (2014). Prospective teachers’ reasons: The importance of reading a book. Bilgi Dunyasi, 15(1), 159–175.

Fareen, J. A. M. (2013). English Communication Today: Problems and Perspectives on Communicating in English in the Technical Colleges of Tamilnadu. Journal of Advances in English Language Teaching; vol, 1(4), 106-116.

Goodman, K. S. (1970). What Happens in Reading. Reading Process and Program, edited by KS Goodman and OS Niles. Ur-bana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English.

Goodman, K.S. (1997). The reading processes. In Encyclopedia of language and education (pp. 1-7). Springer, Dordrecht.

Graves, M.F. & Cooke, C.L. (1980). Effects of previewing difficult short stories for high school students, research on reading in secondary schools: A semi-annual report (pp. 38-54).

Holme, R., & Chalauisaeng, B. (2006). The learner as needs analyst: The use of participatory appraisal in the EAP reading classroom. English for Specific Purposes, 25(4), 403–419.

Huey, E.B. (1898). Preliminary experiments in the physiology and psychology of reading. The American Journal of Psychology, 9(4), pp.575-586.

Journal, J. B.-T. C., & (1991), undefined. (n.d.). Performance in English skills courses and overall academic achievement. Teslcanadajournal.Ca. Retrieve

Jufri, J. (2018). Teaching Reading by Making Predictions at Senior High School. Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(1), pp.252-261.

Linda M. Phillips. (1990). Classroom discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education 6:2, pages 197-200.

Locascio, G., Mahone, E.M., Eason, S.H. & Cutting, L.E. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of learning disabilities, 43(5), pp.441-454.

Phillips, L.M. (1988). Young readers' inference strategies in reading comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 5(3), pp.193-222.

Smith, F. (1975). The role of prediction in reading. Elementary English, 52(3), pp.305-311.

Spires, H.A. and Donley, J. (1998). Prior knowledge activation: Inducing engagement with informational texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(2), p.249-260.

Zwiers, J. (2004). Building Reading Comprehension Habits in Grades 6? 12: A Toolkit of Classroom Activities. International Reading Association, Headquarters Office, 800 Barksdale Rd., PO Box 8139, Newark, DE 19714-8139.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles