Grammaticalization of Transfer Verbs in Mandarin Chinese
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.14Keywords:
transfer verb, grammaticalization, case, voice, Mandarin ChineseAbstract
In Mandarin Chinese, historical changes in serial verb constructions have played an important role in the development of grammaticalization. In traditional analyses, few studies have been conducted to investigate connections between the lexical use and grammatical use of a given item (Yin, 2004). The case/voice markers in Mandarin have not been systematically investigated. This study seeks to fill these gaps and systematically investigates grammaticalization of typical Mandarin case/voice markers. The results of the study show that typical case/voice markers in Mandarin have been derived from transfer verbs and that the grammaticalization of Mandarin transfer verbs is not totally random, but motivated. Transfer verbs typically reflect human interactions and manipulations with physical objects, and thus, they can be good candidates to be utilized to indicate interactive relations. It is argued that employing transfer verbs as case/voice markers is motivated by the concepts of motion and transitivity as well (Yin, 2004). The paper demonstrates that in grammaticalization the semantics of lexical items is bleached; however, traces of their original meanings are retained. The study indicates that grammaticalization is a matter of degree and that case/voice markers developed from Mandarin transfer verbs display a continuum along the path of grammaticalization.
References
Fagerli, O. T. (2001). Malefactive by means of GIVE. In Simonsen, H. G., & Endresen R. T. (Eds.), A cognitive approach to the verb: Morphological and constructional perspectives (pp. 203-222). Mouton de Gruyter.
Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (1980). Transitivity in grammar and discourse. Language, 56, 251-299.
Hopper, P. J., & & Traugott, E. C. (1993). Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
Ji, S. (1997). Imperfective verbs and the BA construction: an analysis from the “Transitive Prototype” perspective. Papers in Experimental and Theoretical Linguistics, 4, 11-21. University of Alberta.
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1, Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1991a). Concept, image, and symbol: The cognitive basis of grammar. Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (1991b). Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 2, Descriptive application. Stanford University Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1993). Reference-point constructions. Cognitive Linguistics, 4(1). 1-38.
Langacker, R. W. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. (2013). Essentials of Cognitive Grammar. Oxford University Press.
Li, C. N. and Sandra, A. T. (1974 a). An explanation of word order change SVO > SOV. Foundations of Language, 1(2), 201-214.
Li, C. N. & Sandra, A. T. (1974 b). Coverbs in Mandarin Chinese: verbs or prepositions? Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 2(3). 257-278.
Li, C. N. & Sandra, A. T. (1977). Development of the causative in Mandarin Chinese: interaction of diachronic process in syntax. In Shibatani, M. (Ed.). Syntax and Semantic 6: The Grammar of Causative Constructions (pp. 477-492). Academic Press.
Li, C. N. & Sandra, A. T. (1981). Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. University of California Press.
Li, H. (2018). The grammaticalization of dao in Mandarin Chinese. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 195, 267-271.
Lichtenberk, F. (1991). Semantic change and heterosemy in grammaticalization. Language, 67(3), 475-509.
Lord, C. (1982). The development of object markers in serial verb languages. In Hopper, P. J., & Thompson, S. A. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics 15, Studies in Transitivity (pp. 277-299). Academic Press.
Lord, C. (1993). Historical Changes in Serial Verb Constructions. John Benjamin’s.
Mei, T. L. (1991). The historical development of the verb-resultative complement construction, with a note on the neutralization of the pre-verbal agent/patient distinction in Middle Chinese. Linguistics forum, 16, 112-36.
Newman, J. (1993). The semantics of giving in Mandarin. In Geiger, R. A., & Rudzka-Ostyn, B. (Eds.), Conceptualizations and Mental Processing in Language (pp. 433-485). Mouton de Gruyter.
Newman, J. (1993). Give: A Cognitive Linguistic Study. Mouton de Gruyter.
Sun, C. F. (1996). Word-Order Change and Grammaticalization in the History of Chinese. Standford University Press.
Tai, J. (1984). Verbs and times in Chinese: Vendler’s four categories. In Testen, D. (Ed.), Lexical Semantics (pp. 288-296). Chicago Linguistic Society.
Wang, L. (1958). Hanyu Shigao II [Draft on the History of the Chinese Language II]. Zhonghua Book Company.
Wu, H. C. (2003). A Case Study on the Grammaticalization of GUO in Mandarin Chinese－Polysemy of the Motion Verb with Respect to Semantic Changes. Language and Linguistics, 4(4), 857-885.
Yin, H. (2002). A cognitive approach to the Japanese verb kuru ‘come’. Proceedings of the 2002 Northwest Linguistics Conference, 67-82. Simon Fraser University, Canada.
Yin, H. (2003). A cognitive account of Mandarin coverbs. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria, 17, 201-108.
Yin, H. (2004). Grammaticalization of Mandarin transfer verbs gei and bei as passive markers. In Junker, M. O., McGinnis, M., & Yves Roberge (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 Canadian Linguistic Association Conference, 12 pages.
Yin, H. (2011). The cognitive semantics of Chinese motion/directional verbs. Working Papers of the Linguistics Circle of the University of Victoria, 21, 118-125.
Yin, H. (2016). Continuum of Coverbs and Distinctions between Coverb Constructions and Serial Verb Constructions. International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science, 4(3), 31-40.
