Examination of the Use of Feedback in EFL Writing Instruction: A Case Study of Jordan

Authors

  • Luqman M Rababah Jadara University
  • Othman Khalid Al-Shboul Jadara University
  • Ala’Eddin Abdullah Banikalef Jadara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1401.28

Keywords:

English as a Foreign Language, creativity in writing, feedback

Abstract

When comparing public and private schools, it is clear there are significant differences in teaching methods, and this may be used to help pupils become writers that are more creative. The goal of this research is to examine the concept of creative writing by analyzing comments made by EFL educators in their instruction. Fifteen EFL teachers in Jordan were interviewed and observed. The researcher interviewed fifteen teachers to get their opinions on how they think feedback may be used to foster creativity in writing among EFL students. The interview results revealed that thirteen instructors utilized student comments to encourage English as foreign language writers to be more creative. Moreover, observations found that ten instructors employed feedback in their courses, including peer feedback. This research supports the use of a pre- and post-test in an experimental evaluation of the impact of interventions (such as feedback) on students' writing creativity. Why some instructors oppose using creative writing exercises (feedback) is a subject that requires deeper exploration.

Author Biographies

Luqman M Rababah, Jadara University

Department of English Language and Translation

Othman Khalid Al-Shboul, Jadara University

Department of English Language and Translation

Ala’Eddin Abdullah Banikalef, Jadara University

Department of English Language and Translation

References

Al-Shboul. O.K. (2022). The Students’ perceptions of Arabic and English as a medium of instruction in Jordan. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12, 7, 1441-1446. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1207.26

Banikalef, A., & Rababah, L. (2018). Gender differences and emotional expressiveness on Facebook: An analysis of prosodic features among Jordanian Facebookers. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 2(3), 180-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.22158/sll .v2n3p18

Bardaweel, M & Rababah, L. (2022). Gender differences in using Arabizi among Jordanian undergraduate students: A socio-linguistic study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(1).86-95

Bruning, R., & Mason, B. J. (2001). Providing feedback in computer-based instruction: What the research tells us. Lincoln: Center for Instructional Innovation.

Craft, A. (2001). Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing practice: Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Dyson, A. H. (1995). Writing Children Reinventing the Development of Childhood Literacy. Written Communication, 12(1), 4-46.

Hancock, T. E., Thurman, R. A., & Hubbard, D. C. (1995). An expanded control model for the use of instructional feedback. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(4), 410-425.

Hyland,K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language teaching, 39(02), 83-101.

Jiang, S. (2011). On peer feedback in english writing classes in China. In Education and Educational Technology (pp. 699-704). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford/New York: Pergamon

Krashen, S. (1994). The pleasure hypothesis. In Alatis, J. (ed.), Georgetwon University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press, 299-322.

Krause, K-L., Bochner, S., & Duchesne, S. (2006). Educational psychology for learning and teaching. (2nd. ed.) Thomson Learning Australia.

Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998). ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups. Journal of second language writing, 7(2), 113-131.

Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of second language writing, 8(3), 265-289.

Pridemore, D. R., & Klein, J. D. (1991). Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(4), 27-32.

Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT journal, 59(1), 23-30.

Rababah, L., Almwajeh, M. (2018). Promoting Creativity in EFL/ESL Writing through Scaffolding Strategy. International Journal of English and Education (IJEE), 7(3), 148-160.

Rababah, L., & Bani Melhem, N. (2015). Investigation into Strategies of Creativity in EFL Writing in Jordan. Journal of Literature, Languages and Linguistics, 5(23), 14-25. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n7p94

Rababah, L. (2019). Using Collaborative Learning Strategies to Improve Creativity in EFL Writing: Attitudes and Actual Use. Journal of Education in Black Sea Region, 5(1), 36-52.

Rababah, L., & Banikalef, (2019). The use of valuing strategies into enhancing creativity in EFL writing. Education and Linguistics Research, 5(1), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.5296/elr.v5i1.14507

Rababah, L., Alshehab, M., & Bani Melhem, N. (2018). Exploring the Factors that Hinder Jordanian Students in Developing Creativity in EFL Writing. International Journal of English and Education (IJEE),7(3), 161-170.

Rababah, L. (2022).Contextualization to Enhance Students’ Writing Ability, Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(11), 22-32.

Rababah, L. (2018). An adapted version of Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT) In EFL/ESL writing: A rubric scoring and a review of studies. International Journal of English and Education (IJEE), 7(2), 128-136.

Rababah, I., Rababah, L. (2018). The actual use of brainstorming strategy among teachers of Arabic for speakers of other languages in writing classes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(1), 133-143. 10.5539/ijel.v9n1p15

Schinke-Llano, L. (1995). Re-envisioning the second language classroom: A Vygotskian approach. In F.R. Eckman (Ed.). Second language acquisition theory and pedagogy (pp. 21-28). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Shayer, M. (2003). Not just Piaget; not just Vygotsky, and certainly not Vygotsky as alternative to Piaget. Learning and Instruction, 13(5), 465-485.

Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Slagle, P., Trinko, L. A., & Lutz, M. (2013). From ‘hello’to higher-order thinking: The effect of coaching and feedback on online chats. The Internet and Higher Education, 16, 78-84.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological process. Cambridge, MS: Harvard University Press.

Williams, J. M. G., Watts, F. N., MacLeod, C., & Mathews, A. (1997). Cognitive psychology and emotional disorders (2nd ed). Chichester: Wiley

Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006). A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. Journal of second language writing, 15(3), 179-200.

Zhao, H. (2010). Investigating learners’ use and understanding of peer and teacher feedback on writing: A comparative study in a Chinese English writing classroom. Assessing writing, 15(1), 3-17.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles