A Comparative Linguistic Study on Ambai, Ansus, Menawi and Biak Languages in Papua
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1403.32Keywords:
genetic relationship, reconstruction, sub-groupAbstract
This study is historical-comparative linguistic research of the languages of indigenous peoples in Saireri Bay, Papua province, namely the Ambai, Ansus, Menawi, and Biak languages. These languages are classified as non-Austronesian languages (SIL, 2000) and are hypothesized to be closely related. This study aims to find accurate evidence to reveal the genetic relationship level between these four languages. The study's data consisted of the Swadesh list's 200 basic words. The method applied in this study is a comparative method, supported by observation, interview, and documentation techniques. Based on the lexicostatistics technique, it was found that the quantitative evidence indicated that the highest related cognates reach 47% and the lower-level reach 38%, based on the lexicostatistics from the Swedish’s 200 basic vocabularies. The percentage of the related vocabulary is higher than in the other languages in the regency. The qualitative evidence found is the exclusive shared phonological and lexical innovation, strengthening the quantitative evidence. The innovation that phoneme PAAMB *j turns into/z/and/d/, *h turns into/O/on Biak. Besides that, metathesis, omission, and phoneme addition. In addition, after the reconstruction, the phoneme system of Proto-language Ansus-Ambai-Menawi and Biak (PAAMB) with segmental phonemes is five vowels and 15 consonant phonemes. The vowels of PAAMB are *i, *e, *a, *o, and *u, which have complete distribution, and the consonants that are (1) consonants that have complete distribution *p, *m, *h, (2) consonants that have distribution in the initial and middle of words *b, *w, *f, *t, *d, *n, *s *r, *j, *k, *g, *y, dan *h.
References
Bynon, T. (1990). Historical Linguistics. London: Cambridge University Press.
Capell, A. (1938). The linguistic position of South Eastern Papua. University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies (United Kingdom).
De Vries, L. (2005). Towards a typology of tail–head linkage in Papuan languages. Studies in Language. International Journal sponsored by the Foundation “Foundations of Language”, 29(2), 363-384.
Dunn, M., Reesink, G. P., & Terrill, A. (2002). The East Papuan languages: A preliminary typological appraisal. Oceanic Linguistics, 41(1), 28-62.
Durie, M., & Ross, M. (Eds.). (1996). The comparative method reviewed: Regularity and irregularity in language change. Oxford University Press.
Dyen, I., Kruskal, J. B., & Black, P. (1992). An Indoeuropean classification: A lexicostatistical experiment. Transactions of the American Philosophical society, 82(5), iii-132.
Gonzales, R. (2019). Evolution of Phonology in Language: Case of Timor Leste. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 1(01), 1-11.
Heeschen, V. (1982). Some systems of spatial deixis in Papuan languages. Here and there. Cross-linguistic studies in deixis and demonstration, 81-109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company
Jannah, S. N. R. (2018). Language Kinship between Tulambatu and Tolaki Language in North Konawe. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 9(1), 91-102.
Mbakop, A. W. N. (2021). The Language of Evangelisation in 'Foreign' Territories: The case of Maroua, Cameroon. The International Journal of Language and Cultural (TIJOLAC), 3(2), 29-45.
Ross, M. (2005). Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages. Papuan pasts: Cultural, linguistic and biological histories of Papuan-speaking peoples, 572, 15-65.
Ruhlen, M. (2022). On the origin of languages. In On the Origin of Languages. Stanford University Press.
Schmidt, K. H. (1992). Contributions from new data to the reconstruction of the proto-language. EC Polomé & Winter, W.,(arg.), Reconstructing languages and cultures. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin & New York, 35-62.
Sidwell, P. (2002). Genetic classification of the Bahnaric languages: a comprehensive review. Monkhmer Studies, 32(2), 1-24.
