Exploring Graduate Teaching Assistants’ Beliefs and Practices in Chinese as a Foreign Language Tutoring Program
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1404.01Keywords:
second language instruction, individual tutorials, teachers’ beliefs, graduate teaching assistantsAbstract
The current qualitative study researches graduate Teaching Assistants’ (TAs’) beliefs and teaching practices towards Chinese as a Foreign Language (CFL) tutoring sessions and examines the possible factors that shape and influence their beliefs about teaching and tutoring. Data was collected through semi-structured interviews with three experienced graduate TAs in a CFL program at a higher education institution in the U.S. Findings revealed that TAs viewed tutoring with four major functions: review/practice of course content, remedial work, test preparation, and individualized instruction. To achieve effectiveness with these functions, they identified three types of methods for tutoring: great emphasis on explicit and implicit instruction of grammar and vocabulary, adoption of error feedback in tutoring writing, and recognition and attempted implementation of task-based teaching. Four factors have been identified to impact TAs’ beliefs: TA training, curriculum guidelines, students’ feedback, and preconceived beliefs. By exploring the TAs’ beliefs, the program administrators would know more about the gaps in their curriculum objectives and actual teaching practices, thus can better train TAs in the future, which is also beneficial to the language learners. This professional and practical motivation is the goal of the current study.
References
ACTFL. (2012). National standards for foreign language education. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://www.actfl.org/publications/guidelines-and-manuals/actfl-proficiency-guidelines-2012/chinese
Allen, H. W., & Negueruela–Azarola, E. (2010). The professional development of future professors of foreign languages: Looking back, looking forward. The Modern Language Journal, 94(3), 377-395.
Allen, L. Q. (2002). Teachers' pedagogical beliefs and the standards for foreign language learning. Foreign Language Annals, 35(5), 518-529.
Asian Languages (Chinese), BA: Program Description. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://webapp4.asu.edu/programs/t5/majorinfo/ASU00/LACHIBA/undergrad/false
Borg, S. (1999). The use of grammatical terminology in the second language classroom: A qualitative study of teachers’ practices and cognitions. Applied Linguistics, 20, 95–126.
Borg, S. (2011). The impact of in-service teacher education on language teachers' beliefs. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 370-380.
Chiang, Y. (2010). Native Chinese language teachers' beliefs and experiences on their teaching in the U.S (Order No. 3432102). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (822233939). Retrieved July 30, 2019, from http://login.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/login?url=https://www-proquest-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu/docview/822233939?accountid=4485
Chinese Language Flagship ROTC Program. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://silc.asu.edu/admission/chinese-language-flagship-program/chinese-language-flagship-rotc-program
Fives, H., & Buehl, M. M. (2008). What do teachers believe? Developing a framework for examining beliefs about teachers’ knowledge and ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(2), 134-176.
Fives, H., & Gregoire, G. M. (Eds.). (2014). International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.ezproxy1.lib.asu.edu
Fox, C. A. (1993). Communicative competence and beliefs about language among graduate teaching assistants in French. The Modern Language Journal, 77(3), 313-324.
Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2017). Teachers' Beliefs in English Language Teaching and Learning: A Review of the Literature. English Language Teaching, 10(4), 78-86.
Hu, B., & Tian, L. (2012). Do teachers and students share similar beliefs about teaching and learning strategies? System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 40(2), 237-254.
Kagan, D. M. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the Goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 3, 419–469.
Li, L. (2013). The complexity of language teachers' beliefs and practice: One EFL teacher's theories. The Language Learning Journal, 41(2), 175-191.
Matthews, P. H. (2010). Factors influencing self-efficacy judgments of university students in foreign language tutoring. The Modern Language Journal, 94(4), 618-635.
Mills, N. A., & Allen, H. W. (2007). Teacher self-efficacy of graduate teaching assistants of French. In J. Siskin (Ed.), From thought to action: exploring beliefs and outcomes in the foreign language (pp. 213–234). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Moloney, W. (2016). Limiting professional trajectories: a dual narrative study in Chinese language education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-016-0007-6
MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. (2007). Foreign languages and higher education: New structures for a changed world. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from https://www.mla.org/Resources/Research/Surveys-Reports-and-Other-Documents/Teaching-Enrollments-and-Programs/Foreign-Languages-and-Higher-Education-New-Structures-for-a-Changed-World
Moloney, R., & Wang, D. (2016). Limiting professional trajectories: a dual narrative study in Chinese language education. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 1(1), 1-15.
Murphy, D., Evans-Romaine, K., & Zheltoukhova, S. (2012). Student and tutor perspectives of tutoring in a Russian flagship program. Russian Language Journal, 62, 107-127.
Ning, C. Y. (2001). Second-language studies and college-level Chinese-language textbooks in the United States. China Review International, 8(1), 34-56.
Orton, J. (2008). The Current State of Chinese Language Education in Australian Schools. The University of Melbourne. Retrieved July 30, 2019, from: https://education.unimelb.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0008/3093326/ChinaReport.pdf
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332.
Potowski, K. (2002). Experiences of Spanish Heritage Speakers in University Foreign Language Courses and Implications for Teacher Training. ADFL Bulletin, 33(3), 35-42.
Rankin, J., & Becker, F. (2006). Does reading the research make a difference? A case study of teacher growth in FL German. The Modern Language Journal, 90(3), 353-372.
Saydee, F. (2016). Foreign language teaching: A study of teachers’ beliefs about effective teaching and learning methodologies. Journal of the National Council of Less Commonly Taught Languages, 18, 63-91.
Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51–80). Sage Publications, Inc.
Spring, M. K. (2012). Languages for specific purposes curriculum in the context of Chinese‐language Flagship programs. The Modern Language Journal, 96(s1), 140-157.
Tang, J., & Harrison, C. (2011). Investigating university tutor perceptions of assessment feedback: three types of tutor beliefs. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(5), 583-604.
Williams, J. (2004). Tutoring and revision: Second language writers in the writing center. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), 173-201.
Williams, J., & Severino, C. (2004). The writing center and second language writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(3), 165-172.
Yuan, R., & Lee, I. (2014). Pre-service teachers' changing beliefs in the teaching practicum: Three cases in an EFL context. System, 44, 1-12.
Zheng, H. (2009). A Review of Research on EFL Pre-Service Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices. Teacher Education, 4(1), 73-81.
Zheng, X., & Borg, S. (2014). Task-based learning and teaching in China: Secondary school teachers’ beliefs and practices. Language Teaching Research, 18(2), 205-221.
