A Critical Discourse Analysis of Medical English Course Syllabuses

Authors

  • Haiying Liang University College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1404.02

Keywords:

critical discourse analysis, English for medical purposes, course syllabuses

Abstract

This article presents an analysis of the teacher-student power relationship embedded in three English for Medical Purposes (EMP) course syllabuses at a case study university. The study employs Fairclough's critical discourse analytical approach to examine the linguistic elements of the syllabuses, including verbs, modality, and quantifying adjectives. The findings reveal that the syllabuses textually represent an unequal power relationship, with the teachers holding significant authority over the students. This finding is significant as it contradicts some recommendations that ESP teaching should avoid a teacher-centred approach. By analysing the linguistic elements of the syllabuses, this study provides valuable insights into the power dynamics in EMP courses and highlights the importance of critically examining course materials for equitable and student-centred learning environments.

Author Biography

Haiying Liang, University College London

Institute of Education

References

Blackie, D. J. J. S. (1979). Towards a definition of ESP. ELT Journal, 33(4), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/XXXIII.4.262

Chen, L. (2019). Vulnerable live patients, powerful dead patients: A textual analysis of doctor-patient relationships in popular Chinese medical dramas. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 6(1), 1–17.

Cheng, H. Y., & Ding, Q. T. (2021). Examining the behavioral features of Chinese teachers and students in the learner-centered instruction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00469-2

Dasein, B. M. (2017). Freedom to Learn for the 80’s. Educational Review, 69(2), 266–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2016.1257558

Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. Pearson Education.

Halliday, M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Arnold.

Huba, M. E., & Freed, J. E. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning. ERIC.

Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge University Press.

Kember, D. (2000). Action learning and action research: Improving the quality of teaching and learning. Psychology Press.

Lai, M. K., & Vethamani, M. E. (2015). Learner-centered approaches to teaching: A comparison of two models in a tertiary EFL setting in Malaysia. English Language Teaching, 8(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v8n2p107

Li, X. (2019). The introduction of learner-centred pedagogy in northwest China: A critique. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.

Luo, J., & Garner, M. (2017). The challenges and opportunities for English teachers in teaching ESP in China. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 8(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0801.10

Nagao, A. (2018). A genre-based approach to writing instruction in EFL classroom contexts. English Language Teaching, 11(5), 130. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n5p130

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning theories: An educational perspective (6th ed.). Pearson.

Sharkey, S., & Weimer, M. (2003). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Teaching Sociology, 31(2), 251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211318

Van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse and Society, 6(2), 243–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926595006002006

You, Y. (2019). The seeming ‘round trip’ of learner-centred education: A ‘best practice’ derived from China’s new curriculum reform. Comparative Education, 55(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050068.2018.1541662

Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centered teaching: Five key changes to practice. Jossey-Bass.

Downloads

Published

2023-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles