Ideational Metaphor in Saudi EFL Students’ Academic Writing: A Systemic-Functional Linguistic Analysis

Authors

  • Eman A. Alhusaiyan Shaqra University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.13

Keywords:

academic writing, ideational metaphor, SFL, students' essay, writing skill

Abstract

Over the past decade, there has been an upsurge in studies on the quality of EFL students' English academic writing. However, research on grammatical metaphors in academic writing by EFL students is limited. As such, the purpose of this research is to identify the occurrences of ideational metaphors in students' academic writing essays. In this research, the qualitative descriptive approach was applied. This study included 20 undergraduate students from the English Language and Literature Department at the College of Science and Humanities in Shaqra University, Saudi Arabia, Essay Writing course in the fourth level. Students were to write 350-word essay on the subject of "Learning Difficulties During the Coronavirus Pandemic". The data corpus for the study totals 8,482 words. According to the findings, the students' essays include 408 sentences that comprise the ideational metaphor. It is considered insignificant in contrast to the corpus's full data set of 8,482 words. The occurrence of ideational metaphors is dominated by material processes, followed by mental processes, relational processes, behavioral processes, and existential processes. This conclusion shows that EFL students' essay structures are unlikely to have a high number of good grammatical metaphor clauses. For EFL students, lecturers, teachers, and other educational professionals involved in instructing English academic writing, this study has pedagogical implications; it sheds light on how grammatical metaphors in writing texts can serve as a stand-in for the caliber of writing used in academic and scientific literature.

Author Biography

Eman A. Alhusaiyan, Shaqra University

English Language Department, College of Science & Humanities

References

Al-Saadi, Z. (2020). Gender Differences in Writing: The Mediating Effect of Language Proficiency and Writing Fluency in Text Quality. Cogent Education, 7(2), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2020.1770923

Casal, J. E. & Lee, J. J. (2019). Syntactic Complexity and Writing Quality in Assessed First-Year L2 Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 44, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2019.03.005

Chanyoo, N. (2018). Cohesive Devices and Academic Writing Quality of Thai Undergraduate Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(5), 994-1001. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0905.13

Eggins, S. (2004). An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistics. In Continuum International Publication Groups (Second). Continuum. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01476765

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th Ed. University of Birmingham, U.K.: Routledge.

Kazemian, B., Behnam, B. & Ghafoori, N. (2013). Ideational Grammatical Metaphor in Scientific Texts: A Hallidayan Perspective. International Journal of Linguistics. 5. 146-168. 10.5296/ijl.v5i4.4192.

Khatter, S. (2019). An Analysis of the Most Common Essay Writing Errors among EFL Saudi Female Learners (Majmaah University). Arab World English Journal, 10(3), 364-381. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol10no3.26

Kim, S. & Kessler, M. (2022). Examining L2 English University Students’ Uses of Lexical Bundles and Their Relationship to Writing Quality. Assessing Writing, 51(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100589

Lestari, D. M. (2020). An Analysis of Students’ Difficulties in Writing Undergraduate Thesis at English Education Program of Muhammadiyah University of Bengkulu. Premise Journal, 9(1), 17-29. https://fkip.ummetro.ac.id/journal/index.php/english (accessed on June 9, 2022)

Liardét, C. L. (2018). ‘As We All Know’: Examining Chinese EFL Learners’ Use of Interpersonal Grammatical Metaphor in Academic Writing. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 64-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.11.005

Mahmudah, M., Hajrah, H., Amir, A., & Arifin, M. A. (2018). Grammatical Metaphor in academic texts of Indonesian students' thesis. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI), 1(1), 54-61. http://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v1i1.8

Marr, J. W. (2019). Making the mechanics of paraphrasing more explicit through Grammatical Metaphor. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 42(2), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100783

Martin, J. R., Matthiessen, C. M. I. M., & Painter, C. (1997). Working with functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Naghdipour, B. (2021). English Writing Pedagogy at the Crossroads: The Case of Oman. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52(2), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2021.100815

Nuruzzaman, M., Islam, A.B.M.S. & Shuchi, I.J. (2018). An Analysis of Errors Committed by Saudi Non-English Major Students in the English Paragraph Writing: A Study of Comparisons. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 9(1), 31-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.31

Özkayran, A. & Yılmaz, E. (2020). Analysis of Higher Education Students’ Errors in English Writing Tasks. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 11(2), 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.11n.2-p.48

Pasaribu, A. N., Pasaribu, T.K., Hutauruk, M.N., & Marbun, L. (2021). Error in Students' Thesis Writing: Syntactical and Morphological Error Analysis. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal), 4(4), 86958704. https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v4i4.2818

Pasaribu, A. N. (2021). A Common Error Analysis in Students’ English Narrative Writing. Linguistic, English Education and Art (LEEA), 4(2), 436-445. https://doi.org/10.31539/leea.v4i2.2338

Suhadi, J. (2018). “The Adequacy of Grammatical Metaphor to Account for World Languages”. In The 1st Annual International Conference on Language and Literature, KnE Social Sciences, pages 1–14. http://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v3i4.1912

Tavernier, M. (2018). Grammatical Metaphor and Grammaticalization: The Case of Metaphors of Modality. Functions of Language, 25(1), 164–204. https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.17014.tav

Thipatdee, G. (2019). The Development of English Writing Skills Through Techniques of Sentence Skeleton and Signpost Word Analysis for English Major Students. English Language Teaching, 12(4), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v12n4p32

To, V. (2018). Linguistic Complexity Analysis: A Case Study of Commonly-Used Textbooks in Vietnam. SAGE Open, 20(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018787586

Xuan, W. W. & Chen, S. (2019). A Synthesis of Research on Grammatical Metaphor: Meta-Data and Content Analysis. WORD, 65(4), 213–233, https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.2019.1670911

Yang, B. (2018). Textual Metaphor Revisited. Australian Journal of Linguistics, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2018.1400502

Zhang, X., Lu, X. & Li., W. (2021). Beyond Differences: Assessing Effects of Shared Linguistic Features on L2 Writing Quality of Two Genres. Applied Linguistics, 1-9. http://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab007

Zhang, Y. (2018). Examining the Application of Grammatical Metaphors in Academic Writing. English Language and Literature Studies, 8(20), 108-114. https://doi.org/10.5539/ells.v8n2p108

Downloads

Published

2023-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles