Occurrence Frequency of Rhetorical Moves in Introductions of Linguistics Research Articles From Non-Scopus and Scopus Journals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.16Keywords:
rhetorical moves, occurrence frequency, research article introductions, Scopus-indexed-journals, non-Scopus-indexed journalsAbstract
Serving as a fundamental opening section, the research article introduction (RAI) provides an entrance to a certain topic in the exploration of the unknown content of the research. It is a manifestation of rhetorical maneuver and establishes the context, identifies the challenges, and outlines the rationale for the study. Therefore, it is vital to make a well-crafted RAI to catch readers’ attention. However, the disparities in rhetorical moves employed in English linguistics RAIs between non-Scopus-indexed and Scopus-indexed journals have received less scrutiny. The present study aims to investigate the rhetorical move structures in both types of corpora. The non-Scopus and Scopus corpus each contained 50 RAIs. Based on the adapted Swales’ (1990) Create-A-Research-Space (CARS) model, the occurrence frequency of moves and steps was first analyzed, and the relationship between the frequency of moves and steps and the indexing of journals was then explored. The findings showed that the most frequent move in both corpora was Move 1, followed by Move 3 and Move 2. However, the higher number of overall moves in the non-Scopus corpus suggested that there was an overuse of moves by the less experienced writers, and through Chi-square, Move 3 Step 1B (announcing present research) was detected to have a significant relationship with the indexing of journals. The findings of this study pave the way for writers to construct well-organized RAIs and get their papers published in the field of linguistics.
References
Abdullah, S. (2016). An analysis of cross-discipline research article introduction structures through a modified create-a-research-space (cars) model. EFL Journal, 1(1), 1-16.
Afrizon, E., & Arsyad, S. (2018). A discourse analysis of rhetorical style in research article introduction in law studies written by international authors. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 2(4), 84-102.
Ahlstrom, D. (2010). Clearing the first hurdle at the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 27, 171-177.
Ahlstrom, D. (2017). How to publish in academic journals: Writing a strong and organized introduction section. Journal of Eastern European and Central Asian Research, 4(2), 1-9.
Alsharif, M. (2023). Rhetorical Move Structure in Business Management Research Article Introductions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(4), 1268-1283.
Badib, A. A., & Sutopo, J. (2012). Citation and tense for reviewing previous research in the introduction section of English 1science journals by non-native speakers. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 1(1), 160-163.
Can, S., Karabacak, E., & Qin, J. (2016). Structure of moves in research article abstracts in applied linguistics. Publications, 4(3), 1-16.
Dudley-Evans, T., & St John, M. J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge university press.
Ebrahimi, B., & Weisi, H. (2019). Genre variation in the introduction of scientific papers in Iranian and international computer science journals. Issues in Language Teaching, 8(2), 51-82.
Feak, C. B., Swales, J. M., Irwin, V. V., & Swales, J. M. (2011). Creating contexts: Writing introductions across genres. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Grant, A. M., & Pollock, T. G. (2011). Publishing in AMJ—Part 3: Setting the hook. Academy of management journal, 54(5), 873-879.
Hill, S. S., Soppelsa, B. F., & West, G. K. (1982). Teaching ESL students to read and write experimental‐research papers. TESOL Quarterly, 16(3), 333-347.
Jalilifar, A. (2010). Research article introductions: Sub-disciplinary variations in applied linguistics. The Journal of Teaching Language Skills, 2(2), 29-55.
Joseph, R., Lim, J. M. H., & Nor, N. A. M. (2014). Communicative moves in forestry research introductions: Implications for the design of learning materials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 134, 53-69.
Kheryadi, S. (2016). Analysis of Rhetorical Moves of Journal Articles and Its Implication to the Teaching of Academic Writing. In 63th TEFLIN seminar, Surabaya.
Kobayashi, M. (2003). The role of peer support in ESL students' accomplishment of oral academic tasks. Canadian modern language review, 59(3), 337-369.
Konrad, A. M. (2008). Knowledge creation and the journal editor’s role. In Y. Baruch, A. M. Konrad, H. Aguinis, & W. H. Starbuck (Eds), Opening the black box of editorship (pp. 3-15). Palgrave Macmillan.
Lewin, B. A., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2001). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. Continuum.
Lim, J. M. H. (2012). How do writers establish research niches? A genre-based investigation into management researchers' rhetorical steps and linguistic mechanisms. Journal of English for academic purposes, 11(3), 229-245.
Lindeberg, A. C. (2004). Promotion and politeness: Conflicting scholarly rhetoric in three disciplines. Åbo Akademi University Press.
Lu, X., Casal, J. E., Liu, Y., Kisselev, O., & Yoon, J. (2021). The relationship between syntactic complexity and rhetorical move-steps in research article introductions: Variation among four social science and engineering disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 54, 1-13.
Marina, T., & Sterligov, I. (2021). Prevalence of potentially predatory publishing in Scopus on the country level. Scientometrics, 126(6), 5019-5077.
McGrath, I. (2000). Teacher autonomy. In B. Sinclair, I. McGrath and T. Lamb (eds.) Learner autonomy, teacher autonomy: Future directions (pp. 100-110). Longman.
Nwogu, K. N. (1997). The medical research paper: Structure and functions. English for specific purposes, 16(2), 119-138.
Öztürk, I. (2018). Rhetorical Organisation of the Subsections of Research Article Introductions in Applied Linguistics. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 12(1), 52-65.
Qian, D. F. (2015). Contrastive Study on RA Introductions in Applied Linguistics by L1 and L2 Writers: Rhetorical Moves and Linguistic Realization. Master’s thesis, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.
Samanhudi, U. (2017). Introduction of Research Articles in Applied Linguistics by Indonesian and English Academics. Indonesian Research Journal in Education |IRJE|, 1(1), 58-71.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for specific purposes, 21(1), 1-17.
Shehzad, W. (2008). Move two: Establishing a niche. Ibérica, 15, 25-49.
Shehzad, W. (2010). Announcement of the principal findings and value addition in computer science research papers. Ibérica, 19, 97-118.
Sheldon, E. (2011). Rhetorical differences in RA introductions written by English L1 and L2 and Castilian Spanish L1 writers. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 10(4), 238-251.
Singh, V. K., Singh, P., Karmakar, M., Leta, J., & Mayr, P. (2021). The journal coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 126, 5113-5142.
Slaim, S., & Mostari, H. A. (2019). Rhetorical structure of economics research articles’ introductions. Revue des Lettres et Sciences Sociales, 16(3), 262-270.
Soodmand Afshar, H., & Ranjbar, A. (2017). A comparative study of rhetorical moves adopted in research questions and method sections of applied linguistics research articles. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 46-71.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. M. (2004). Research genres: Explorations and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J., & Najjar, H. (1987). The writing of research article introductions. Written communication, 4(2), 175-191.
Zhang, B., & Wannaruk, A. (2016). Rhetorical Structure of Education Research Article Methods Sections. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand, 51, 155-184.
