Motivation, Strategy Use, and Comprehension in Foreign Language Reading: The Case of Saudi EFL Learners at the Preparatory Year
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1405.17Keywords:
reading motivation, reading strategy use, reading comprehension, EFL reading, Saudi preparatory year studentsAbstract
This study explored the relationships among reading motivation, reading strategy use and, reading comprehension in EFL reading. A cohort of 308 male and female EFL students at the preparatory year of an emerging Saudi university completed a reading motivation questionnaire, a reading strategy questionnaire, and a reading comprehension test. Independent samples t-test results revealed that students with high reading motivation (extrinsic, intrinsic, and efficacy) used three reading strategy categories (pre, while, and post-reading strategies) more frequently than students with moderate reading motivation. Similarly, students with high reading motivation were found to have better reading comprehension. Reading strategy use was also found to induce significant differences in students’ reading comprehension. Results of multiple regression revealed that extrinsic motivation was the best predictor of students’ reading strategy use and reading comprehension. Of all strategy categories, while-reading strategies were the best predictor of students’ reading comprehension. Of all motivation and strategy factors, while-reading strategies, reading efficacy and extrinsic motivation significantly predicted reading comprehension, with while-reading strategies being the strongest predictor. Implications for reading instruction and suggestions for further research are offered.
References
Abbasian, G., & Hartoonian, A. (2014). Using self-regulated learning strategies in enhancing language proficiency with a focus on reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 7(6), 160-167. Doi:10.5539/elt.v7n6p160
Afflerbach, P., Pearson, D., & Paris, S. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. Doi:10.1598/RT.61.5.1
Aini, I., & Akhiriyah, S. (2022). The correlation between students’ reading strategy and reading comprehension in secondary school. The Journal of English Literacy Education, 9(1), 88-100. Doi: https://doi.org/10.36706/jele.v9i1.17476
Alsamadani, H. (2022). Reading strategies among Saudi EFL students. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 22(9), 131-136. https://doi.org/10.22937/IJCSNS.2022.22.9.20
Alsuhaibani, Z. (2019). The relationship between female EFL students' use of reading strategies and their reading self-efficacy. IJAES, 19(2), 377-398. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes2000.19.2.8
Altumigah, E., & Alkhaleefah, T. (2022). The relationship between reading self-efficacy and perceived use of reading strategies among Saudi EFL students. International Journal of Linguistics, 14(6), 48-76. Doi: 10.5296/ijl.v14i6.20037
Azizifar, A., Roshania, S., Gowhary, H., & Jamalinesari, A. (2015). The effect of pre-reading activities on the reading comprehension performance of Ilami high school students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 192, 188-194. Doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.027
Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental consideration in language testing. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bachman, L., & Kunnan, A. (2005). Workbook and CD for statistical analyses for language assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A. (1994). Self-Efficacy. In V. Ramachaudran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (pp. 71-81). New York: Academic Press.
Dhanapala, K. (2008). Motivation and L2 reading motivation behaviors of university students in Japan and Siri Lanka. Journal of the International Development and Cooperation, 14(1), 1-11.
Dhanapala, K., & Hirakawa, Y. (2016). L2 reading motivation among Sri Lankan university students. Read. Psychol. 37, 202–229. Doi:10.1080/02702711.2015.1025163
Dison, M., & Shah, P. (2020). Reading strategies and reading motivation among secondary level of students in Sarawak. IJNTR, 6(110), 07-14. https://doi.org/10.31871/IJNTR.6.11.25
Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410613349
Erten, I., Topkaya, E., & Karakas, M. (2010). Exploring motivational constructs in foreign language reading. H. U. Journal of Education, 39, 185-196.
Fauzi, I., Saman, T., Zannah, N., Octaviani, S., & Winey, B. (2022). The relationship between students’ reading motivation and the success to comprehend the English texts. Journal of English Teaching and Learning Issues, 5(1) page 31–38. DOI:10.21043/jetli.v5i1.14959
Fitri, D., Sofyan, D., & Jayanti, F. (2019). The correlation between reading self-efficacy and reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 3(1), 1-12. Doi: 10.33369/jeet.3.1.1-13
Ghabdian, F., & Ghafournia, N. (2016). The Relationship between Iranian EFL learners’ self- efficacy beliefs and reading comprehension ability. English Linguistics Research, 5(1), 38-50. Doi: 10.5430/elr.v5n1p38
Guthrie, J., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. Pearson and R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 403-422). New York: Longman.
Habibian, M., & Roslan, S. (2014). The Relationship between self-efficacy in reading with language proficiency and reading comprehension among ESL learners. Journal of Education and Practice, 5(14), 119-126. ISSN 2222-1735; ESSN: 2222-288X
Han, F. (2021). The relations between motivation, strategy use, frequency, and proficiency in foreign language reading: an investigation with university English language learners in china. Foreign Language in a Global Nexus, 1-12 DOI: 10.1177/21582440211008423
Han, S., & Choi, Y. (2018). Post-reading question-generation activities and cooperative learning in EFL reading. English Teaching, 73(2), 37-58. DOI: 10.15858/engtea.73.2.201806.37
Islam, S. (2018). The correlation between reading strategies and reading achievement across learning styles. Indonesian EFL Journal: Journal of ELT, Linguistics, and Literature, 4(2), 133-146.
Kim, K. (2011). Reading motivation in two languages: An examination of EFL college students in Korea. Read. Writ. 24, 861–881. Doi: 10.1007/s11145-010-9229-z
Li, H., & Gan, Z. (2022). Reading motivation, self-regulated reading strategies and English vocabulary knowledge: Which most predicted students’ English reading comprehension? Front. Psycho, 13:1041870. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1041870
Li, L., & Kaur, S. (2014). Textbook reading strategies and its relationship to reading test performance. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 14(3), 1-18. Doi: 10.17576/GEMA-2014-1403-01
Lin, D., Wong, K., & McBridge-Chang, C. (2012). Reading motivation and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among bilingual students. Read. Writ. 25, 717-737. Doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9297-8
Meniado, J. (2016). Metacognitive reading strategies, motivation, and reading comprehension performance of Saudi EFL students. English Language Teaching, 9(3), 117-129. Doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n3p117
Mohammed, G. (2022). The impact of reading strategies and self-efficacy on reading comprehension: The case of Saudi EFL learners. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(Special Issue 1), 627-639.
Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2, 249-259. Doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
Mori, S. (2002). Redefining motivation to read in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 91-110.
Ölmez, F. (2015). An investigation into the relationship between L2 reading motivation and reading achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 597-603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.561
Oranpattanachai, P. (2023). Relationship between the reading strategy, reading self-efficacy, and reading comprehension of Thai EFL students. LEARN Journal, 16(1), 194-220.
Oxford, R. (2001). Language learning strategies. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), Teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 166-172). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206.025
Ozek, Y., & Civelek, M. (2006). A Study on the Use of Cognitive Reading Strategies by ELT Students. The Asian EFL Journal. Professional Teachers Articles, 1-26.
Paris, S., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. (1996). The development of strategic readers. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal & P. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research (609-640). Mahwah, N.J.: Erlhaum.
Phakiti, A. (2003). A Closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26-56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
Pintrich, P., & Schunk, D. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and application (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Pintrich, P. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2016). Facilitating and hindering motivation, learning, and well-being in schools: Research and observations from Self-Determination Theory. In K. Wentzel & D. Miele (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 96-119). Routledge.
Sari, M. (2016). Cognitive and metacognitive reading strategy use and reading comprehension performance of Indonesian EFL pre-service teachers. Journal of Foreign Language Teaching and Learning, 1(2), 47-61. Doi: 10.18196/ftl.1213
Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Read. Res. Q. 47, 427–463. Doi: 10.1002/rrq.030
Shang, H. (2010). Reading strategy use, self-efficacy and EFL reading comprehension. The Asian EFL Journal Quarter, 12(2), 18-42.
Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29, 431–449. Doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
Tercanlioglu, L. (2002). Strategy use, reading efficacy and academic achievement. Journal of College Literacy and Learning, 31, 53-70.
Wang, X., Lina, J., & Yuanying, J. (2020). Reading amount and reading strategy as mediators of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.586346
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
Zare, P. (2013). Exploring reading strategy use and reading comprehension success among EFL Learners. World Applied Sciences Journal, 22(11), 1566-1571. DOI: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.22.11.1493
Zarei, A. (2018). On the relationship between metacognitive reading strategies, reading self-efficacy, and L2 reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 22, 158-181.
Zhang, L., & Sukying, L. (2022). The relationships between cognitive and metacognitive strategies and EFL reading test performance of Thai university learners. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(7), 100-115. Doi:10.46827/ejes.v9i7.3464
Zhang, L., Goh, C., & Kunnan, A. (2014). Analysis of test takers’ metacognitive and cognitive strategy use and EFL reading test performance: a multi-sample SEM approach. Lang. Assess. Q. 11, 76–102. doi:10.1080/15434303.2013.853770.
Zhang, L., & Seepho, S. (2013). Metacognitive strategy use and academic reading achievement: Insights from a Chinese context. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 10(1), 54–69.
