Sudanese EFL Ph.D. Students’ Attitudes and Perceptions Towards Using Zoom During the COVID-19 Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.03Keywords:
EFL students, zoom, perceptions, COVID-19, SudanAbstract
This study explores the online learning experience of Sudanese Ph.D. candidates in learning English as a Foreign Language (EFL) when using Zoom during the COVID-19 pandemic at the Sudan University of Science and Technology. The study is to explore the EFL students’ attitudes and perceptions towards using Zoom. Data is collected by designing a closed/ended questionnaire and a focused-structured interview of six candidates from the same population. The questionnaire was distributed to the whole population of 40 Ph.D. candidates. Data is analysed using SPSS and Thematic analysis of qualitative data. The analysis reveals that the participants are satisfied with the online lecture delivery and enjoy the opportunity to develop technological skills and knowledge of Internet technology. Results also reveal that Zoom enables the EFL students to build valuable relationships with their advisors and increase their productivity. Finally, candidates perceive some disadvantages with Zoom as a tool for learning. Some candidates find the cost of the internet obstructive. This research is important as it gives university lecturers insights into the challenges and practice of using new models of online learning as an effect of the pandemic on education. It is believed that the success of this experience of online learning determines Sudanese EFL Postgraduate students’ satisfaction and readiness to use different models of online tools during and after future crises and pandemics.
References
Agarwal, S., & Kaushik, J. S. (2020). Student's perception of online learning during the COVID pandemic. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 87(7), 554. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-020-03327-7
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(5), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4
Alam, A. (2020). Challenges and possibilities of online education during COVID-19. Preprints. DOI: 10.20944/preprints202006.0013.v1. Retrieved on 25, January, 2023 from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341904059_Challenges_and_Possibilities_of_Online_Education_during_Covid-19
Archibald, M. M., Ambagtsheer, R. C., Casey, M. G., & Lawless, M. (2019). Using Zoom videoconferencing for qualitative data collection: perceptions and experiences of researchers and participants. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. Volume 18, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919874596
Blacker, A. (2021). Worldwide & US Download Leaders 2020. Apptopia. Retrieved 15 March, 2022, from https://blog.apptopia.com/worldwide-us-download-leaders-2020
Candarli, D., & Yuksel, H. G. (2012). Students' perceptions of video-conferencing in the classrooms in higher education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 357-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.663
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Garrett, R. & Jokivirta, L. (2004). Online learning in commonwealth universities: Selected data from the 2004 Observatory Survey, Part 1. The Observatory on Borderless Higher Education. Retrieved 22 June, 2022, from https://docplayer.net/101707458-Online-learning-in-commonwealth-universities-selected-data-from-the-2004-observatory-survey-part-1.html
Gangwal, N., & Veena, B. (2016). Application of Decomposed Theory of Planned Behavior for M-commerce adoption in India. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, 2, 357-367. https://doi.org/10.5220/0005627503570367. Retrieved 27 November, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/302973883
Guzacheva, N. (2020). Zoom technology as an effective tool for distance learning in teaching English to medical students. Bulletin of Science and Practice, 6(5), 457–460. https://doi.org/10.33619/2414-2948/54/61
Knipe, D., & Lee, M. (2002). The quality of teaching and learning via videoconferencing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 301–311.
Maul, J., Berman, R., & Ames, C. (2018). Exploring the psychological benefits of using an emerging video technology to coach and retain doctoral learners. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 049–078. https://doi.org/10.28945/3954
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications. Inc.
Niess, M. & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2013). Developing asynchronous online courses: Key instructional strategies in a social metacognitive constructivist learning trajectory. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education, 27(1), 1-23.
Nyasulu, C., & Winner, D. C. (2019). Using the decomposed theory of planned behaviour to understand university students’ adoption of WhatsApp in learning. E-Learning and Digital Media Journal, 16(5), 413-429. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019835906
Paudel, P. (2021). Online education: Benefits, challenges, and strategies during and after COVID-19 in higher education. International Journal on Studies in Education, 3(2), 70–85. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijonse.32
Sayem, A.S.M., Taylor, B., McClanachan, M., & Mumtahina, U. (2017). Effective use of Zoom technology and instructional videos to improve engagement and success of distance students in engineering. In Proceedings AAEE2017 Conference Manly Sydney Australia, 1–6. Retrieved 17 August, 2022, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Benjamin-Taylor-16/publication/323268816
OECD (The Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development). (2001). E-Learning: The Partnership Challenge. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved on 12 May,2022,from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/e-learning_9789264193161-en
OECD. (2005). E-learning in Tertiary Education: Where Do We Stand?, OECD Publishing. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation. Paris. Retrieved on 16 July , 2022, from https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/e-learning-in-tertiary-education_9789264009219-en
Serhan, D. (2020). Transitioning from face-to-face to remote learning: Students’ attitudes and perceptions of using Zoom during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 335–342. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.148
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.6.2.144.
Toquero, C. M. (2020). Challenges and opportunities for higher education amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The Philippine context [Review Article]. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/7947.
Wali, A. Z., & Omaid, M. E. (2020). The use of smartphones as an educational tool in the classroom. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(16), 238-247. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i16.14179
Wang, Q., Huang, C., & Quek, C. L. (2018). Students' perspectives on the design and implementation of a blended synchronous learning environment. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3404
Yu, F., & Conway, AR. (2012). Mobile/Smartphone use in higher education. Proceedings of the 2012 Southwest Decision Sciences Institute, 831-839.
