The Interplay Between L2 Motivation and Proficiency in Predicting EFL Learners’ Pragmatic Engagement
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.22Keywords:
autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, L2 motivation, pragmatic engagement, self-determination theoryAbstract
Drawing on self-determination theory and L2 pragmatics, this study scrutinizes how two motivational dimensions (autonomous and controlled) can affect EFL learners’ behavioral engagement in learning pragmatics across various English proficiency levels. One hundred ninety-eight Saudi EFL learners were surveyed for their English proficiency level, L2 motivation, and pragmatic engagement. The findings revealed an overall significant positive correlation between EFL learners’ L2 motivation and pragmatic engagement. Autonomous and controlled motivations were significantly and positively correlated with pragmatic engagement among all the English proficiency groups. Learners with advanced proficiency exhibited significantly higher correlations than their counterparts, indicating that L2 motivation mediated by proficiency predicted pragmatic engagement. Learners with higher levels of English proficiency were more sensitive to the pragmatic aspects of the language and, therefore, more motivated toward active engagement in pragmatically oriented contexts than intermediate and upper-intermediate learners.
References
Alamer, A. (2021). Basic psychological needs, motivational orientations, effort, and vocabulary knowledge: A comprehensive model. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(1), 164–184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S02722 6312100005X.
Alrabai, F. (2016). Factors underlying low achievement of Saudi EFL learners. IJEL, 3(6), 21. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v6n3p21
Arabmofrad, A., Derakhshan, A. & Atefinejad, M. (2019). An interplay between Iranian EFL learners’ specific and general interlanguage pragmatic motivation and their meta-pragmatic awareness. Iranian Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 77–94.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A.S. (1996). Language Testing in Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bureau, J. S., Howard, J. L., Chong, J. X., & Guay, F. (2022). Pathways to student motivation: A meta-analysis of antecedents of autonomous and controlled motivations. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 46-72. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211042426
Brutt-Griffler, J., & Jang, E. (2022). Dual language programs: An exploration of bilingual students’ academic achievement, language proficiencies and engagement using a mixed methods approach. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1616670.
Chen, Y. L. E., & Kraklow, D. (2015). Taiwanese college students’ motivation and engagement for English learning in the context of internationalization at home: A comparison of students in EMI and non-EMI programs. Journal of Studies in International Education, 19(1), 46-64. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2019.1616670
Derakhshan, A., & Malmir, A. (2021). The role of language aptitude in the development of L2 pragmatic competence. TESL-EJ, 25(1), 1-30.
Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2019). Interventions for student engagement: Overview and state of the field. Handbook of Student Engagement Interventions, Interventions: Working With Disengaged Students. Academic Press, pp.1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813413-9.00001-2.
Henry, A. (2021). Motivational connections in language classrooms: A research agenda. Language Teaching, 54(2), 221-235. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444820000026.
Henry, A., & Thorsen, C. (2020). Disaffection and agentic engagement: ‘Redesigning activities’ to enable authentic self-expression. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 456-475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818795976
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 13621688211001289. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289.
Kang T., Arvizu M. N. G., Chaipuapae P., Lesnov R. O. (2019). Reviews of academic English listening tests for non-native speakers. International Journal of Listening, 33(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1185210
Khansir, A. A., Pakdel, F. (2021). Place of pragmatics in EFL classroom. ELLR, 72, 47-54. https://doi.org/10.32861/ellr.72.47.54
Malmir, A., & Derakhshan, A. (2020). The socio-pragmatic, lexico-grammatical, and cognitive strategies in L2 pragmatic comprehension: The case of Iranian male vs. female EFL learners. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 1-23.
Martin, A. J., Ginns, P., & Papworth, B. (2017). Motivation and engagement: Same or different? Does it matter?. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 150-162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.013.
Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. Second handbook of English language teaching, 643-660. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030- 02899-2_40.
Mouratidis, A., Michou, A., Sayil, M., & Altan, S. (2021). It is autonomous, not controlled motivation that counts: Linear and curvilinear relations of autonomous and controlled motivation to school grades. Learning and Instruction, 73, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101433.
Noels, K. A., Pelletier, L. G., Clément, R., & Vallerand, R. J. (2000). Why are you learning a second language? Motivational orientations and self‐determination theory. Language learning, 50(1), 57-85. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00111.
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q. (2019). Acting, thinking, feeling, making, collaborating: The engagement process in foreign language learning. System, 86, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102128.
Ren, W., Li, S., & Lü, X. (2022). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of second language pragmatics instruction. Applied Linguistics, 6, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac055
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. New York: Guilford Publications.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 61, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In: Christenson SL, Reschly AL and Wylie C (eds) Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Springer, pp.149–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7.
Saeed, S., & Zyngier, D. (2012). How motivation influences student engagement: A qualitative case study. Journal of Education and learning, 1(2), 252-267.
Sağdıç, A. (2021). Comprehending implied meaning: The combined effects of L2 proficiency, length of residence, and interaction. Applied Pragmatics, 3(2), 136–162.
Sanjaya, I. N. S., Sitawati, A. A. R., Suciani, N. K., Putra, I. M. A., & Yudistira, C. G. P. (2022). The effects of L2 pragmatic autonomous and controlled motivations on engagement with pragmatic aspect. TEFLIN Journal, 33(1), 148-172.
Skinner, E. A. (2016). Engagement and disaffection as central to processes of motivational resilience and development. In: Wentzel KR and Miele DB (eds), Handbook of Motivation at School. 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, pp.145–168.
Tagashira, K., Yamato, K., & Isoda, T. (2011). Japanese EFL learners’ pragmatic awareness through the looking glass of motivational profiles. JALT Journal, 33(1), 5-26.
Taguchi, N., Kostromitina, M. M., & Wheeler, H. (2022). Individual difference factors for second language pragmatics. In The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Individual Differences (pp. 310-330). New York: Routledge.
Taguchi, N. (Ed.). (2019). The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 1-14). New York: Routledge.
Taguchi, N., & Roever, C. (2017). Second language pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Takahashi, S. (2012). Individual differences and pragmalinguistic awareness: A structural equation modeling approach. Language, Culture, and Communication: Journal of the College of Intercultural Communication, 4, 103-125.
Takahashi, S. (2015). The effects of learner profiles on pragmalinguistic awareness and learning. System, 48, 48-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2014.09.004.
Takahashi, S. (2019). Individual learner considerations in SLA and L2 pragmatics. In: Taguchi N (ed) The Routledge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition and Pragmatics (pp. 429–443). New York: Routledge.
Tateyama, Y. (2001). Explicit and implicit teaching of pragmatic routines: Japanese sumimasen. In: Rose KR and Kasper G (eds) Pragmatics in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 200–222.
Zarrinabadi, N., Rezazadeh, M., & Shirinbakhsh, S. (2022). “I can learn how to communicate appropriately in this language” Examining the links between language mindsets and understanding L2 pragmatic behaviors. Journal of Intercultural Communication Research, 51(3), 309-325.
Zhang, Y., Papi, M. (2021). Motivation and second language pragmatics: A Regulatory focus perspective. Front. Psychol., (12). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753605
