Action Research in ESL: Enhancing English Oral Proficiency in an Asynchronous Speech Course

Authors

  • Naseer M. Alomari Borough of Manhattan Community College

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.01

Keywords:

English language learners, oral language proficiency, asynchronous learning, language pedagogy, online educational strategies

Abstract

This action research investigated the impact of remedial collaborative techniques, pedagogical methods, and multimedia resources on enhancing oral language proficiency development among college English Language Learners (ELLs). Action research was used to gather data through a survey questionnaire and interviews with 25 ELLs enrolled in an asynchronous speech course. The participants’ experiences with the remedial course strategies were positive for practicing their English communication skills. The participants attributed their satisfaction to the ample opportunities for collaboration with peers and the instructor, the course structure, and relevant multimedia resources. Feedback emerged as a critical factor in learner engagement and progress. The results underscore the potential of asynchronous learning for fostering oral language proficiency. However, further research is required to validate these findings in different contexts. This study provides a foundation for a more comprehensive understanding of factors contributing to the holistic improvement of oral language proficiency in asynchronous settings for college ELLs.

Author Biography

Naseer M. Alomari, Borough of Manhattan Community College

Speech, Communications, and Theatre Arts Department

References

Artino Jr, A. R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students' satisfaction, perceived learning, and choice. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 191-202-293.

Boud, D., Cohen, R., & Sampson, J. (2001). Peer learning in higher education: Learning from and with each other. Kogan Page Publishers.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Buragohain, D., Punpeng, G., Jaratjarungkiat, S., & Chaudhary, S. (2023). Impact of E-Learning Activities on English as a Second Language Proficiency among Engineering Cohorts of Malaysian Higher Education: A 7-Month Longitudinal Study. Informatics, 10(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10010031

Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and Assessing Intercultural Communicative Competence. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410251

Canals, L. (2020). The effects of virtual exchanges on oral skills and motivation. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 103–119.

Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-233.

Gilakjani, A. P., & Sabouri, N. B. (2016). Learners' Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. English language teaching, 9(6), 123-133. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n6p123

Godwin-Jones, R. (2012). Emerging Technologies for Language Learning. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0365

Goh, C. C. M., & Vandergrift, L. (2021). Teaching and Learning Second Language Listening. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429287749

Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4), 51–55.

Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2022). Facilitating Synchronous Online Language Learning through Zoom. RELC Journal, 53(1), 296-301. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220937235

Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and culture. AILA Review, 27(1), 30-55.

Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and genesis of second language development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.

Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2017). Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 103, 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005

Liddicoat, A. J., & Scarino, A. (2013). Intercultural Language Teaching and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118482070

Long, M. H. (1981). Input, interaction, and second‐language acquisition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 379(1), 259-278.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2018). Engagement Matters: Student Perceptions on the Importance of Engagement Strategies in the Online Learning Environment. Online Learning, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.1092

Mayer, R. E. (2014). Incorporating motivation into multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 29, 171-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.04.003

Means, B., Bakia, M., & Murphy, R. (2014). Learning online: What research tells us about whether, when and how. Routledge.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Sage Publications.

Paul, J., & Jefferson, F. (2019). A Comparative Analysis of Student Performance in an Online vs. Face-to-Face Environmental Science Course From 2009 to 2016. Frontiers in Computer Science, 1, 472525. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2019.00007

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. https://doi.org/10.1037/11494-00

Sadaf, A., Martin, F., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2019). Student Perceptions of the Impact of "Quality Matters" Certified Online Courses on their Learning and Engagement. Online Learning, 23(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v23i4.2009

Salmon, G. (2004). E-moderating: The key to online teaching and learning. Routledge.

Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Simonson, M., Smaldino, S., Albright, M., & Zvacek, S. (2000). Teaching and Learning at a Distance: Foundations of Distance Education (2nd ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall. Upper Saddle River, NJ. ISBN: 0-13-769258-7.

Sun, Z., & Chang, Y. (2012). Blogging to Learn: Becoming EFL Academic Writers through Collaborative Dialogues. Language Learning & Technology, 16(1), 43-61.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive Load During Problem-Solving: Effects on Learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4

Thomson, R. I., & Derwing, T. M. (2015). The Effectiveness of L2 Pronunciation Instruction: A Narrative Review. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 326-344. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amu076

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles