A Multi-Dimensional Contrastive Analysis on English Abstracts in Chinese Master’s Theses and International Core Journal Articles

Authors

  • Yifan Shi Beijing International Studies University
  • Zhencong Liu Beijing International Studies University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.17

Keywords:

Multi-dimensional Analysis, abstract writing, master’s theses, EFL graduate student, academic writing

Abstract

As a signpost for the reader, the abstract contains the main body of a thesis and summarizes the most important information in an article. Thus, it is essential for assessing the quality and value of a thesis. This research aims to provide insight into the linguistic features of English abstract writing. Based on the multi-dimensional analysis approach proposed by Biber (1988), this study investigates the difference in English abstracts between the Chinese master’s theses (CMT) and the international core journal article (ICJA). With the help of the MAT (Multi-dimensional Analysis Tagger 1.3) analysis tool, the corpus of 100 English abstracts from these 2 resources has been analyzed for comparison of the functional and lexical-grammatical features in 6 dimensions. The results show that there are differences between CMT and ICJA’s English abstracts in dimension 4 (Overt Expression of Persuasion) and dimension 6 (On-line Informational Elaboration), and 25 linguistic features across these 6 dimensions. The results help learners identify the differences in dimensions and linguistic features between their English abstracts and those written by experts to improve their abstract writing and to write more native-like theses.

Author Biographies

Yifan Shi, Beijing International Studies University

School of English Language, Literature and Culture

Zhencong Liu, Beijing International Studies University

School of English Language, Literature and Culture

References

Abdollahzadeh, E. (2011). Poring over the findings: Interpersonal authorial engagement in applied linguistics papers. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(1), 288-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2010.07.019

Biber, D. (1988). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511621024

Biber, D. (1989). A typology of English texts. Linguistics, 27(1), 3–43. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1989.27.1.3

Biber, D., Conrad, S., Reppen, R., Byrd, P., & Helt, M. (2002). Speaking and writing in the university: A multidimensional comparison. Tesol Quarterly, 36(1), 9-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/3588359

Brugman, B. C., Burgers, C., Beukeboom, C. J., & Konijn, E. A. (2021). From The Daily Show to Last Week Tonight: A quantitative analysis of discursive integration in satirical television news. Journalism Studies, 22(9), 1181-1199. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2021.1929416

Crosthwaite, P. (2016). A longitudinal multidimensional analysis of EAP writing: Determining EAP course effectiveness. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 22, 166-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.04.005

Dong, J., & Lu, X. (2020). Promoting discipline-specific genre competence with corpus-based genre analysis activities. English for Specific Purposes, 58, 138-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2020.01.005

Feng, E. Y., & Wu, L. (2016). Guo nei wai guang xue lei ke ji qi kan lun wen ying wen zhai yao ti cai dui bi fen xi [A contrastive genre analysis of English abstracts from Chinese and international journals in optics]. Zhong guo ke ji qi kan yan jiu, (02), 230-236.

Friginal, E., & Weigle, S. (2014). Exploring multiple profiles of L2 writing using multi-dimensional analysis. Journal of Second Language Writing, 26, 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.09.007

Gregg, N., Coleman, C., Stennett, R. B., & Davis, M. (2002). Discourse complexity of college writers with and without disabilities: A multidimensional analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940203500103

Halliday, M. A. (1988). On the language of physical science. In M. Ghadessy (Ed.) Registers of written English: Situational factors and linguistic features (pp. 162-178). Burns & Oates.

Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourse: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman.

Nini, A. (2015). Multidimensional Analysis Tagger (Version 1.3). Retrieved March 19, 2022, from https://sites.google.com/site/multidimensionaltagger/

Paltridge, B., & Starfield, S. (2020). Thesis and Dissertation Writing in a Second Language: A Handbook for Students and their Supervisors, 2nd ed. New York/London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203960813

Pan, F. (2018). A multidimensional analysis of L1–L2 differences across three advanced levels. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies, 36(2), 117-131. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073614.2018.1476162

Pan, F. (2022). Duo wei du yan jiu san shi nian fa zhan zong shu he fang fa xiang jie [A review of 30-year development of multi-dimensional analysis and step-by-step procedures]. Wai yu jiao xue li lun yu yan jiu, (01), 26-34.

Qiu, G. Z. (2015). Zhong mei yi xue qi kan ying wen zhai yao mo hu xian zhi yu dui bi fen xi [A comparative analysis of hedging in English abstracts of Chinese and American medical journals]. Zhong guo ke ji qi kan yan jiu, (11), 1212-1216.

Sardinha, T. B., & Pinto, M. V. (2019). Dimensions of variation across American television registers. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 24(1), 3-32. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.15014.ber

Sun, L. (2015). Zhong guo shuo shi xue wei lun wen ying wen zhai yao de yu yong shen fen jian gou yan jiu [Study of Chinese MA Students’ Construction of Pragmatic Identities in English Thesis Abstracts]. Wai yu yu wai yu jiao xue, (05), 15-21. https://doi.org/10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.004164

Tseng, F. P. (2011). Analyses of move structure and verb tense of research article abstracts in applied linguistics journals. International journal of English linguistics, 1(2), 27. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v1n2p27

Veirano Pinto, M. (2014). Dimensions of variation in North American movies. InT. Berber Sardinha & M. Veirano Pinto (Eds.), Multi-dimensional Analysis, 25 Years on: A Tribute to Douglas Biber (pp. 109–146).

Xie, Q. & Ma, Y. Y. (2021). Zhong wai bo shi xue wei lun wen ying wen zhai yao de dui wei du dui bi fen xi [A Multi-dimensional Contrastive Analysis of English Abstracts in Dissertations by Chinese and Native PH.D. Students]. Wai yu xue kan, (04), 39-44. https://doi.org/10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2021.04.006

Xie, S. (2020). Multidimensional analysis of Master’s thesis abstracts: a diachronic perspective. Scientometrics, 123(2), 861-881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03408-6

Zhang, Y. N., Sun, C. H., & Li, Y. (2018). Zhong wai yu yan lei qi kan gao bei yin lun wen yin wen zhai yao yu yan te zheng duo wei du fen xi [Multi-dimensional Analysis of the English Abstracts of the Most-Cited Articles in Linguistics Journals]. Wai yu dian hua jiao xue, (04), 64-71.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-31

Issue

Section

Articles