The Emergence of a Globalized City Through Multilingual Local Practice: A Situated Reading of Signs in Jeddah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.18Keywords:
Jeddah, linguistic landscape (LL), Saudi Arabia, private signs, public signsAbstract
The current research aims to add to the ethnographic studies by providing an overview to the linguistic landscape of the city of Jeddah which is considered as one of the most important historical and cultural cities in Saudi Arabia. It mainly attempts to analyse texts shown on public and private signs found in government buildings, streets, districts’ names, malls and commercial shops. The study makes use of a sample of 300 signs collected randomly from different parts of Jeddah, interviews and observations. Following Bourdieu’s (1991) design approach to describe an intellectual character to space with a new ideological load, the study intends to examine the influences of certain ethnographic factors on the linguistic landscape; namely the geographical distribution, power relation, globalization and the presence of English, modernity and prestige. To investigate information and symbolic functions, linguistic landscape analysis was carried out to the data collected. Results obtained from the study include that Jeddah’s linguistic landscape has specific characteristics influenced by the aforementioned ethnographic factors, occurrence of alignment between official language policy and language use and practice, slight variation in the linguistic landscape between the three parts of the city is noticed and that English language is gaining more prominent status compared to Arabic language.
References
Abdelhay, A., Ahmed, M. & Mohamed, E. (2016). The semiotic Landscaping of Heritage: Al-Mantiqa al-Tarikhiyya in Jeddah. Linguistic Landscape, 2, 1, 52-79. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Abu-Ghazzeh, T. (1998). The future of Jeddah-al Qademah: Conservation or redevelopment – Saudi Arabia. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 15(3), 225-242.
Al-Athwary, A. (2017). English and Arabic Inscriptions in the Linguistic Landscape of Yemen: A Multilingual Writing Approach. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(4), 149. “https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.4p.149”
Almahmoud, M. & Ahmed, M. (2020). Language Planning in the Saudi Context Through Investigating Students’ Attitudes towards SA, CA and English. In A. Abdelhay, S. B. Makoni & C. G. Severo (Eds.,) Language Planning and Policy: Ideologies, ethnicities, and semiotic spaces of power. (1st ed., pp. 68-93). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
An-Nizam al-Asasi lilhukm [Basic Law of Governance]. (1992). No. A/90, 01-03-992. Retrieved on March 6, 1992 from: https://laws.boe.gov.sa/BoeLaws/Laws/LawDetails/16b97fcb-4833-4f66-8531-a9a700f161b6/1#
Backhaus, Peter. (2007). Linguistic Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban Multilingualism in Tokyo. Clevedon, U.K.: Multilingual Matters.
Barni, M., & Bagna, C. (2015). The critical turn in LL: New methodologies and new items in LL. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 6-18.
Ben-Rafael, Elizier, Elana Shohamy, Muhammad Hasan Amara, Nira Trumper-Hecht. (2006). Linguistic landscape as symbolic construction of the public space: The case of Israel. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3.1, 7–30.
Bourdieu, Pierre. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge: Polity.
Bradley, J. (2005). Saudi Arabia exposed: Inside a kingdom in crisis. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures. Abingdon: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1981). The order of discourse. In R. Young (Ed.), Untying the text: A poststructuralist reader, 51-78. Boston: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Goddard, A. (1998). The Language of Advertising. London: Routledge.
Gorter, D., & Cenoz, J. (2015). Linguistic landscapes inside multilingual schools. In B. Spolsky, M. Tannenbaum, & O. Inbar (Eds.), Challenges for language education and policy: Making space for people. (pp. 151-169). New York: Routledge Publishers.
Haarmann, H. (1986). Verbal strategies in Japanese fashion magazines—a study in impersonal bilingualism and ethnosymbolism. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 58, pp. 107-121.
Huebner, Thom. (2006). Bangok’s linguistic landscapes: Environmental print, codemixing and language change. International Journal of Multilingualism, 3.1, pp. 31-51.
Iedema, R. (2003). Multimodality, resemiotization: Extending the analysis of discourse as multisemiotic practice. Visual Communication, 2(1), 29–57.
Inya, B. T. (2019). Linguistic Landscape of Religious Signboards. In Ado Ekiti, Nigeria: Culture, Identity, and Globalisation. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 9(9), 1146. “https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0909.11”
Kreslins, J. (2003). Linguistic landscapes in the Baltic. Scandinavian Journal of History, 28 (3_4), 165_174.
Landry, R., & Bourhis, R. (1997). Linguistic landscape and ethnolinguistic vitality: An empirical study. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 16(1), 23-49.
Pavlenko, A., & Mullen, A. (2015). Why diachronicity matters in the study of linguistic landscapes. Linguistic Landscape, 1 (1/2), 114–132.
Ruzaite, J. (2017). The linguistic landscape of tourism: Multilingual signs in Lithuanian and polish resorts. Eesti Ja Soome-Ugri Keeleteaduse Ajakiri, 8(1), 197–220. “https://doi.org/10.12697/jeful.2017.8.1.11”
Sciriha, L. and Vassallo, M. (2001). Malta: A Linguistic Landscape. Malta: University of Malta.
Shohamy, E. (2015). LL research as expanding language and language policy. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 152–171.
Silverstein, M & Urban, G. (Eds.). (1996). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Wazarat At-Tijara [Ministry of Commerce]. (2020). Regulations. Available at: https://mc.gov.sa/ar/Regulations/Pages/default.aspx
Yafi, A. (2013). Jeddah fi sadr al-Islam [Jeddah in the Heart of Islam]. Jeddah.
