MALL as a Language Learning Tool for Saudi EFL University Learners: An Empirical Study With Reference to TAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1501.30Keywords:
Empirical Study, Mobile-Assisted Language Learning, English-Major Students, Saudi ArabiaAbstract
Veteran US technology writer and publisher Fred Davis defined the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) as characterized by perceived usefulness and usefulness by users. However, these attitudes are largely determined by external variables such as age, gender, and social set up. This study aims to apply an extended conceptual framework of TAM to examine the adoption of MALL by English-major students, encompassing variables such as perceived enjoyment, instructor support, and MALL interactivity as exogenous factors. A questionnaire was administered to 392 English-major students at King Saud University, employing a cross-sectional research design. Using AMOS version 26.0, results from confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the convergent and discriminant validity of the study constructs. The structural model results demonstrated a statistically significant impact of external variables – perceived enjoyment, MALL interactivity, and instructor support – on students' perceptions of MALL usefulness and ease of use. As a result, students' perceived usefulness and ease of use significantly influenced their intention to adopt MALL for language learning. The model accounted for 62% of the variance in MALL tools adoption among Saudi English major students. In conclusion, the extended TAM framework effectively explains the adoption of MALL by Saudi English major students.
References
Abdullah, D., Jayaraman, K., Shariff, D. N., Khairil Anuar, B., & Norfezah, Md. N. (2017). The effects of perceived interactivity, perceived ease of use, and perceived usefulness on online hotel booking intention: A conceptual framework. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 16-23. International Academic Research Journal (IAR Journal). http://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)30109-5
Dahlan Abdullah, K. Jayaraman, D.N. Shariff, Khairil Anuar Bahari, and Norfezah Md Nor. (2017). The Effects of Perceived Interactivity, Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness on Online Hotel Booking Intention: A Conceptual Framework. International Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 3(1), 16-23.
Alahmadi, N. S. & Alraddadi, B.M. (2020). The Impact of Virtual Classes on Second Language Interaction in the Saudi EFL Context: A Case Study of Saudi Undergraduate Students. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 56-72.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.4.
Almekhlafy, A., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2016). Mobile- Mediated сommunication a tool for Language Exposure in EFL Informal Learning Settings. Arab World English Journal, 7(1), 388- 407. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2804018
Alyoussef, I. (2021). E-Learning Acceptance: The Role of Task–Technology Fit as Sustainability in Higher Education. Sustainability, 13, 6450. 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116450
Alzahrani, H. (2016). Examining the effectiveness of utilizing mobile technology in vocabulary development for language learners. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), Vol, 6. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol6no3.7
Binyamin, S. S., Rutter, M., & Smith, S. (2019). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Understand Students’ Use of Learning Management Systems in Saudi Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(03), pp. 4–21. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i03.9732
Botero, G. G., Questier, F., Cincinnato, S., He, T., & Zhu, C. (2018). Acceptance and usage of mobile assisted language learning by higher education students. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 426–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9177-1
Byrne, B. M. (2013). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), (1986), pp. 1173-1182, 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
Cheng, Y. M. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of e‐learning acceptance. Information Systems Journal, 21(3), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2010.00356.x
Cheon, J., Lee, S., Crooks, S. M., & Song, J. (2012). An investigation of mobile learning readiness in higher education based on the theory of planned behavior. Computers & Education, 59, 1054–1064. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.04.015
Coursaris, C. K., & Sung, J. (2012). Antecedents and consequents of a mobile website’s interactivity. New Media & Society, 14(7), 1128–1146. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812439552.
Dahal, N., Manandhar, N. K., Luitel, L., Luitel, B. C., Pant, B. P., & Shrestha, I. M. (2022). ICT tools for remote teaching and learning mathematics: A proposal for autonomy and engagements. Advances in Mobile Learning and Education Research, 2, 289–296. doi: 10.25082/AMLER.2022.01.01
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, 319–340.
Diacopoulos, M. M., & Crompton, H. (2020). A systematic review of mobile learning in social studies. Computers & Education, 154, 103911. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103911.
Drueke, B., Mainz, V., Lemos, M., Wirtz, M., & Boecker, M. (2021). An Evaluation of Forced Distance Learning and Teaching Under Pandemic Conditions Using the Technology Acceptance Model. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.701347.
Gao, C., & Shen, H. (2020). Mobile-technology-induced learning strategies: Chinese University EFL students learning English in an emerging context. ReCALL, 33(1), 1-18. https://doi:10.1017/S0958344020000142
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage Publications Inc.
Hashmi, N. (2016). Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) in the EFL Classroom and its Impact on Effective Teaching-learning Process in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 5, 202-206. https://doi.org/10.7575/AIAC.IJALEL.V.5N.2P.202.
Herring, M. C., Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2016). Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators. London: Routledge.
Hoi, V. N. (2020). Understanding higher education learners’ acceptance and use of mobile devices for language learning: A rasch-based path modeling approach. Computers & Education, 146, 103761. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103761.
Hoi, V., & Mu, G. (2020). Perceived teacher support and students' acceptance of mobile-assisted language learning: Evidence from the Vietnamese higher education context. British Journal of Educational Technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal (CALL-EJ), 23(1), 466-491, 2022
Huang, H. M., & Liaw, S. S. (2018). An analysis of learners' intentions toward virtual reality learning based on constructivist and technology acceptance approaches. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1), 91-115. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v19i1.2503.
Jurayev, T. N. (2023). The use of mobile learning applications in higher education institutes. Advances in Mobile Learning and Education Research, 3, 610–620. doi: 10.25082/AMLER.2023.01.010.
Kacetl, J., & Klimova, B. F. (2019). Use of smartphone applications in English language learning—a challenge for foreign language education. Education Sciences, 9(3), 179-187. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030179
Khanh, N., & Gim, G. (2014). Factors Influencing Mobile-Learning Adoption Intention: An Empirical Investigation in High Education. Journal of Social Sciences, 10, 51-62. https://doi.org/10.3844/JSSP.2014.51.62.
Kimathi, F. A., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Exploring the general extended technology acceptance model for e-learning approach on student’s usage intention on e-learning system in University of Dar es Salaam. Creative Education, 10(1), 208-223.
Klimova, B. (2018). Mobile phones and/or smartphones and their apps for teaching English as a foreign language. Education and Information Technologies, 23(3), 1091–1099.
Kline, R. B. (2023). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (5th ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Lee, B.-C., Yoon, J.-O., & Lee, I. (2009). Learners’ acceptance of e-learning in South Korea: Theories and results. Computers & Education, 53(4), 1320–1329.
Liu, I. F., Chen, M. C., Sun, Y. S., Wible, D., & Kuo, C. H. (2010). Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community. Computers and Education, 54(2), 600–610. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.009
Metheny, J., McWhirter, E. H., & O'Neil, M. E. (2008). Measuring perceived teacher support and its influence on adolescent career development. Journal of Career Assessment, 16(2), 218–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069072707313198.
Mousa, A. H., Mousa, S. H., Mousa, S. H., & Obaid, H. A. (2020). Advance acceptance status model for E-learning based on university academics and students. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 671(1), 012031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/671/1/012031
Neffati, O. S., Setiawan, R., Jayanthi, P., Vanithamani, S., Sharma, D. K., Regin, R., et al. (2021). An educational tool for enhanced mobile e-learning for technical higher education using mobile devices for augmented reality. Microprocessors and Microsystems, 83, 104030. doi: 10.1016/j.micpro.2021.104030.
O'Bannon, B. W., & Thomas, K. (2014). Teacher perceptions of using mobile phones in the classroom: Age matters! Computers & Education, 74, 15 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.01.006
Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2019). E-learning: development of a model to assess acceptance and readiness of technology among language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 2(6), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640255
Reddy, G., Murthy, V. N., & Vergassola, M. (2022). Olfactory Sensing and Navigation in Turbulent Environments. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics, 13(1), 191–213. https://doi:10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031720-032754.
Sun, Y. & Gao, F. (2019). An investigation of the influence of intrinsic motivation on students’ intention to use mobile devices in language learning. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(3), 1181-1198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09733-9
