Using a Technology-Enhanced Active Learning Classroom to Teach English: A Help or Hindrance?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1505.07Keywords:
active learning, learning space, TEAL classroom, higher education, OmanAbstract
Educators view active learning as a pedagogical enabler for preparing students for the demands of today’s workplaces and equipping students with 21st century skills such as critical thinking, problem solving, collaboration, and teamwork. However, there seems to be a noticeable incongruity between the eagerness on the development of 21st century skills and the learning spaces where these skills are intended to be acquired. The significance of learning spaces and their potential for facilitating or impeding students’ active engagement should not be overlooked. Considering the indispensability of technology in today's world, its integration becomes crucial not only in today's pedagogy and curriculum but also in the design of learning spaces. This study aims to investigate teachers’ perspectives of teaching in a technology-enhanced active learning (TEAL) classroom by exploring their experiences of using the TEAL classrooms, the factors affecting their experiences, and how these factors shape teaching experiences from the viewpoint of teacher participants. This study adopts a mixed methods approach where quantitative and qualitative data collection and analysis are incorporated to address the research questions. Findings of the study suggest that the majority of classroom users had a positive overall impression of the TEAL classrooms with some discussing the challenges they encountered. Analysis of the data shows both classroom-related and non-classroom related factors influencing teachers’ teaching experiences. Classroom-related factors encompass aspects such as classroom layout and the technology embedded within the classroom environment. On the other hand, non-classroom related factors are classified into course-related, teacher-related, and student-related factors.
References
Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802090246
Avidov-Ungar, O., Leshem, B., Margaliot, A., & Grobgeld, E. (2018). Faculty use of the active learning classroom: Barriers and facilitators. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 17, 485–504. https://doi.org/10.28945/4142
Beery, T. A., Shell, D., Gillespie, G., & Werdman, E. (2013). The impact of learning space on teaching behaviors. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(5), 382–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.11.001
Bligh, B., & Crook, C. (2017). Learning spaces. In E. Duval, M. Sharples, R. Sutherland (Eds.), Technology enhanced learning: Research themes (pp. 69-87). Springer, Cham.
Bower, M. (2019). Technology‐mediated learning theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1035–1048.
Brooks, D. C. (2010). Space matters: The impact of formal learning environments on student learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(5), 719–726. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01098.x
Bryson, C., & Hand, L. (2007). The role of engagement in inspiring teaching and learning. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701602748
Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2014). Making the case for space: The effect of learning spaces on teaching and learning. Curriculum and Teaching, 29(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.7459/ct/29.1.02
Carlos, V., Reses, G., & Soares, S. C. (2023). Active learning spaces design and assessment: A qualitative systematic literature review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2163263
Ge, X., Yang, Y. J., Liao, L., & Wolfe, E. G. (2015). Perceived affordances of a technology-enhanced active learning classroom in promoting collaborative problem solving. E-Learning Systems, Environments and Approaches, 305–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05825-2_21
Gonyea, R.M. (2006). The relationship between student engagement and selected desirable outcomes in the first year of college. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://hdl.handle.net/2022/24275
Gordy, X. Z., Jones, E. M., & Bailey, J. H. (2018). Technological innovation or educational evolution? A multi-disciplinary qualitative inquiry into active learning classrooms. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v18i2.23597
Granito, V. J., & Santana, M. E. (2016). Psychology of learning spaces: Impact on teaching and learning. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(1), 1–8.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809
Hernández-de-Menéndez, M., Vallejo Guevara, A., Tudón Martínez, J. C., Hernández Alcántara, D., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2019). Active learning in engineering education. A review of fundamentals, best practices and experiences. International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 13(3), 909–922. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-019-00557-8
Holec, V., & Marynowski, R. (2020). Does it matter where you teach? Insights from a quasi-experimental study on student engagement in an active learning classroom. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 8(2), 140–164. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.8.2.10
Hui, T., Lau, S. S., & Yuen, M. (2021). Active learning as a beyond-the-classroom strategy to improve university students’ career adaptability. Sustainability, 13(11), 6246. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116246
Hung, H. (2014). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.967701
Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2016). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9210-0
Kane, L. (2004). Educators, learners and active learning methodologies. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 23(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260/37042000229237
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.x
Kliever, T. J. (2022). Does furniture comfort impact learning? Examining students’ perceptions about classroom furniture (Order No. 29069198). Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2681808432). Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/does-furniture-comfort-impact-learning-examining/docview/2681808432/se-2
Kusumoto, Y. (2018). Enhancing critical thinking through active learning. Language Learning in Higher Education, 8(1), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.1515/cercles-2018-0003
Lee, K., Dabelko-Schoeny, H., Roush, B., Craighead, S., & Bronson, D. (2018). Technology-enhanced active learning classrooms: New directions for social work education. Journal of Social Work Education, 55(2), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2018.1540322
Lee, Y., Boatman, E., Jowett, S., & Guenther, B. (2014). REAL: The technology-enabled, engaged, and active learning classroom. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.14434/ijdl.v5i1.4020
Marchiori, K. S., & McLean, S. (2022). Active learning spaces foster development of communication skills in senior undergraduate science students. Journal of Learning Spaces, 11(1), 13–26.
Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning: Strategies for the college classroom. Jossey-Bass.
MIT iCampus. (2016, May 10). TEAL – Technology enabled active learning. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://icampus.mit.edu/projects/teal/
Mulcahy, D., Cleveland, B., & Aberton, H. (2015). Learning spaces and pedagogic change: Envisioned, enacted and experienced. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 23(4), 575–595. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2015.1055128
Nealy, C. (2005). Integrating soft skills through active learning in the management classroom. Journal of College Teaching & Learning (TLC), 2(4). https://doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v2i4.1805
Oblinger, D. (2006). Space as a change agent. In D. Oblinger (Ed.), Learning spaces. EDUCAUSE, Washington, DC.
Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning. (2021, December 13). Using the technology enhanced active learning (TEAL) classroom for courses that emphasize problem-solving. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from https://poorvucenter.yale.edu/UsingTEAL
Powers, S. L., Barcelona, R. J., Trauntvein, N. E., & McLaughlin, S. (2022). The role of classroom design in facilitating student engagement in recreation and leisure education. SCHOLE: A Journal of Leisure Studies and Recreation Education, 37(3), 134–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/1937156x.2020.1718042
Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
Sawers, K. M., Wicks, D., Mvududu, N., Seeley, L., & Copeland, R. (2016). What drives student engagement: Is it learning space, instructor behavior or teaching philosophy? Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(2), 26–38.
Thomas, H. (2010). Learning spaces, learning environments and the displacement of learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(3), 502–511. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00974.x
Vercellotti, M. L. (2018). Do interactive learning spaces increase student achievement? A comparison of classroom context. Active Learning in Higher Education, 19(3), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417735606
Xu, Y., Chiu, C., & Ye, X. (2019). Understanding the use of technology-enhanced learning spaces in Hong Kong: An exploratory study. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 39(3), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2019.1598846
