How Americans and Saudis Make Requests: A Politeness Theory Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1505.29Keywords:
speech acts, requests, politeness, formality, directnessAbstract
This study elucidates how speakers of different cultures, namely, Saudi Arabia and United States employ the speech act of requesting, drawing upon various politeness features. It conducted a qualitative analysis to offer explanations for different strategies of requests used by both groups and how they employ politeness features. The present study also conducted small statistics (frequencies and percentages) to explore the most and least common strategies that were used by participants in this study. The sample of this study included 20 Saudis and 20 Americans who were students at Southern Illinois University. The findings revealed that while Saudi participants used more direct strategies than their American counterparts, these direct strategies were characterized as positive politeness. That is, Saudi participants relied on directness feature to minimize the social distance with the addressee. However, American students were more formal than their Saudi counterparts, suggesting that they were less direct when they made requests. But this type of directness is negative as it doesn’t aim at removing social borders between interlocutors. This study indicates that Saudis tend to be more informal (and hence less indirect) than Americans when they make requests. The present study demonstrates that culture is a key social factor to determine how this speech act is employed by speakers of different cultures. It can thus be argued that directness has social implications as it plays an important role in eliminating social borders and minimizing social distance between the interlocutors.
References
Al-Khateeb, S. M. (2009). The speech act of thanking as a compliment response as used by the Arab speakers of English: A comparative intercultural study (Master’s thesis, An-Najah National University College of Graduate Studies). Retrieved February 3, 2024, from https://repository.najah.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/c2bc5baf-9f32-43fb-bef8-6482e1d0abd5/content.
Al Shboul, O, K. (2020). A pragmatic study of requests by males and females in online religious forums. Studies in Linguistics and Literature, 4(3), 70-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22158/sll.v4n3p70
Bajiri, M. E., Alquhali, S. A., & Bladram, M. A. S. (2022). Politeness Strategies of Arabic and American Motivational Speeches: Comparative Study. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(9), 940-951.
Berlo, D. K. (1960). The process of communication: An introduction to theory and practice. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Brown, P. & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Grainger, K., Kerkam, Z., Mansor, F., & Mills, S. (2015). Offering and hospitality in Arabic and English. Journal of Politeness Research, 11(1), 41-70.
Gupta, S., Walker, M., & Romano, D. (2007). How rude are you? Evaluating politeness and affect in interaction. In R. Picard (Ed.), Affective computing and intelligent interaction (pp. 203–217). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74889-2_19
Huang, Y. (2008). Politeness principle in cross-culture communication. Canadian Center of Science and Education, 1(1), 96–101.
Jalilifar, A. (2009). Request strategies: Cross-sectional study of Iranian EFL learners and Australian native speakers. English Language Teaching Journal, 2(1), 46–61. Retrieved February 3, 2024, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1082234.pdf
McKelvie, M. M. (1999). The effect of hyper femininity on communication patterns in dating couples. Northern Illinois University.
Mulac, A., Bradac, J., & Gibbons, P. (2001). Empirical support for the gender-as-a-culture hypothesis: An intercultural analysis of male/female language differences. Human Communication Research, 27, 121–152.
Nugroho, A., & Rekha, A. (2020). Speech acts of requests: A case of Indonesian EFL learners. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 5(1), 1-16.
Qari, I. (2017). Politeness study of requests and apologies a produced by Saudi Hijazi, EFL learners and British English university students. University of Roehampton: London.
Sarfo, E. (2011). Variations in ways of refusing requests in English among members of a college community in Ghana. African Nebula, 1(3), 1–15.
Shams, R., & Afghari, A. (2011). Effects of culture and gender in comprehension of speech acts of indirect request. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 279–287.
Sheer, V. C., & Chen, L. (2003). Successful Sino-Western business negotiation: Participants’ accounts of national and professional cultures. The Journal of Business Communication, 40(1), 50–85. Retrieved February 10, 2024, from http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002194360304000104
Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. Oxford University Press.
Tawalbeh, A., & Al-Oqaily, E. (2012). In-directness and politeness in American English and Saudi Arabic requests: A cross-cultural comparison. Asian Social Science, 8(10), 85–98.
Watts, R. L. (2003). Conservatism in accounting part II: Evidence and research opportunities. Accounting Horizons, 17(4), 287–301.
Zhu, J., & Bao, Y. (2010). The pragmatic comparison of Chinese and Western “politeness” in cross-cultural communication. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 1(6), 848–851.
