Omani University Students’ Attitudes Towards Collaborative Writing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1603.11Keywords:
attitude, collaborative writing, culture, higher-order thinking skillsAbstract
This paper examined the students’ attitudes, based on their cultural background, towards collaborative writing (CW). The participants included 215 undergraduate students from a large public university in the Sultanate of Oman and the instrument used was a questionnaire designed for the study. The results show that students’ general attitudes towards CW are largely neutral to slightly positive on some of the scales. Students acknowledged that CW improves the quality of writing, with a focus on lower-order thinking skills like grammar and vocabulary. Few students said that CW helped them with higher-order thinking skills such as organization. With respect to the influence of their cultural background on their comfort level with CW activities, the results suggest that special attention should be given when pairing or grouping students since students are not comfortable working with the opposite gender or about giving feedback to their peers. In general, results reveal that students need to be taught how to collaborate in their writing classes.
References
Abrams, Z. I. (2019). Collaborative writing and text quality in Google Docs. Language Learning & Technology, 23(2), 22-42.
Brooks, F. B., & Donato, R. (1994). Vygotskyan approaches to understanding foreign language learner discourse during communicative tasks. Hispania, 77, 262-274.
Bruning, R., & Horn, C. (2000). Developing motivation to write. Educational psychologist, 35(1), 25-37.
Chen, W., & Yu, S. (2019). A longitudinal case study of changes in students’ attitudes, participation, and learning in collaborative writing. System, 82, 83-96.
Dobao, A. (2014). Attention to form in collaborative writing tasks: Comparing pair and small group interaction. Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(2), 158-187.
Dobao, A., & Blum, A. (2013). Collaborative writing in pairs and small groups: Learners’ attitudes and perceptions. System, 41(2), 365-378.
Du, F. (2018). Comparing students’ perceptions and their writing performance on collaborative writing: A case study. English Language Teaching, 11(2), 131-137.
Ede, L., & Lunsford, A. A. (1990). Singular Texts/Plural Authors. Perspectives on Collaborative Writing. Carbonbdale: Southern Illinois Press.
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2010). Collaborative writing: Fostering foreign language development and writing conventions development. Language Learning and Technology, 14(3), 51-71.
Estaji, M., & Salimi, H. (2018). The application of wiki-mediated collaborative writing as a pedagogical tool to promote ESP learners’ writing performance. The Asian ESP Journal, 14(1), 112-141.
Graham, S., & Harris, K. R. (1989). Components analysis of cognitive strategy instruction: Effects on learning disabled students' compositions and self-efficacy. Journal of educational Psychology, 81(3), 353–361.
Horwitz, E. K. (1999). Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies. System, 27(4), 557-576.
Kessler, G., Bikowski, D., & Boggs, J. (2012). Collaborative writing among second language learners in academic web-based projects. Language Learning and Technology, 16, 91–109.
Koh, J. H. L. (2019). Four pedagogical dimensions for understanding flipped classroom practices in higher education: A systematic review. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 19(4), 14–33.
Kouros, C. (2000). Student attitudes toward group environments. Center for the Study of Learning and Performance, Concordia University.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2002). Collaborative writing in L2: The effect of group interaction on text quality. In S. Ransdell & M. Barbier (Eds.), New Directions for Research in L2 Writing (pp. 169–188). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kuteeva, M. (2011). Wikis and academic writing: Changing the writer-reader relationship. English for Specific Purposes, 30, 44-57.
Leki, I. (1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 235-260.
McDonough, K., de Vleeschauwer, J., & Crawford, W. (2018). Comparing the quality of collaborative writing, collaborative prewriting, and individual texts in a Thai EFL context. System, 74, 109-120.
McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 934-956.
Peng, J. E. (2011). Changes in language learning beliefs during a transition to tertiary study: The mediation of classroom affordances. System, 39(3), 314-324.
Petric, B. (2002). Students’ attitudes towards writing and the development of academic writing skills. Writing Center Journal, 22(2), 9–27.
Shea, D. (2017). Shifting positions: The development of textual features and academic voice in a university writing seminar. The Asian ESP Journal, 13(2), 7-34.
Shehadeh, A. (2011). Effects and student perceptions of collaborative writing in L2. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(4), 286-305.
Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
Storch, N. (2005). Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 153-173.
Storch, N. (2011). Collaborative writing in L2 contexts: Processes, outcomes, and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 275-288.
Storch, N. (2013). Collaborative writing in L2 classrooms. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
Storch, N., & Aldosari, A. (2013). Pairing learners in pair work activity. Language Teaching Research, 17, 31-58.
Swain, M. (2006). Languaging agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.). Advanced Language Learning: The Contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky. (pp. 95-102). London: Continuum.
Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ responses to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 285-304.
Thompson, L., & Ku, H. Y. (2006). A case study of online collaborative learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 7(4), 361-375.
van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy, and authenticity. Harlow, UK: Longman.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Watanabe, Y. & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of proficiency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: Collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research, 11(2), 121-142.
Weissberg, R. (2000). Developing relationships in the acquisition of English syntax: Writing versus speech. Language and Instruction, 10, 37-53.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2009). Pair versus individual writing: Effects on fluency, complexity, and accuracy. Language Testing, 26, 445-466.
Wigglesworth, G., & Storch, N. (2012). What role for collaboration in writing and writing feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, 364-374.
Zhan, Z., Fong, P. S., Mei, H., & Liang, T. (2015). Effects of gender grouping on students’ group performance, individual achievements and attitudes in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 48, 587-596.
