Enhancing EFL University Students' Writing Skills Through Error Reflection: Perceptions and Implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1605.08Keywords:
error reflection, writing skills, academic writingAbstract
This mixed-methods study investigates the role of error reflection in enhancing the writing skills of undergraduate students. The research comprised a qualitative component with 12 participants and a quantitative survey with 37 respondents. Using a coding scheme that included open, axial, and selective coding, the study identified key themes such as 'Empowerment and Personal Growth through Error Reflection' and 'Privacy, Confidence, and Self-Improvement'. The qualitative analysis revealed that students who engaged in self-review and error reflection not only improved their writing skills but also experienced a heightened sense of empowerment and personal growth. In the quantitative component, participants responded to prompts about their writing habits and perceptions. In the survey, students overwhelmingly favored approaches involving repeated editing, leveraging digital aids for spotting errors, and highlighted the value of maintaining privacy and building confidence during the writing process. The study, while comprehensive, does have constraints including a relatively small participant pool and the inherent subjectivity of self-reported information. Nonetheless, these insights offer a compelling case for incorporating error reflection into writing courses, demonstrating its substantial benefits for enhancing students' learning experiences. The study recommends that educators incorporate structured yet flexible self-review exercises into their teaching practices. Future research is suggested to explore the applicability of these findings in diverse educational settings, to conduct longitudinal studies, and to compare different error reflection techniques. This research contributes significantly to the field of writing education, underscoring the importance of a reflective and student-centered approach to developing writing skills.
References
Alsharari, N. M., & Alshurideh, M. T. (2020). Student retention in higher education: the role of creativity, emotional intelligence, and learner autonomy. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(1), 233-247. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2019-0421
Brockman, E. (2020). Reframing writing prompts to foster nuanced arguments: To what extent? English Journal, 109(6), 37-44. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://www.proquest.com/openview/b8f7b1531401272f0f034d6a6e4d1e0b/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=42045
Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63, 102-112. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001
Cirocki, A., Anam, S., & Retnaningdyah, P. (2019). Readiness for autonomy in English language learning: The case of Indonesian high school students. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 7(2), 1-18. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.30466/IJLTR.2019.120695
Esterhazy, R., & Damşa, C. (2019). Unpacking the feedback process: An analysis of undergraduate students’ interactional meaning-making of feedback comments. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 260-274. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1359249
Fogal, G. G. (2022). Second language writing from a complex dynamic systems perspective. Language Teaching, 55(2), 193-210. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444821000410
Gallagher, K. (2023). Write like this: Teaching real-world writing through modeling and mentor texts. Routledge.
Graham, S. (2019). Changing how writing is taught. Review of Research in Education, 43(1), 277-303. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X18821
Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2019). Academic emotions in written corrective feedback situations. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 1-13. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2018.12.003
Huang, Y., & Jun Zhang, L. (2020). Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 339-364. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2019.1649223
Issa, B. I., Koronkiewicz, B., & Faretta‐Stutenberg, M. (2022). Second‐language writing in university‐level basic language programs: A survey of student and instructor beliefs. Foreign Language Annals, 55(2), 383-407. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12609
Kabaran, G. G. (2022). Graduate students' perceptions of the academic writing process and its problems: A qualitative study in Turkey. Issues in Educational Research, 32(3), 943-959. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.654421548966818
Kendall, J., & Khuon, O. (2023). Writing sense: Integrated reading and writing lessons for English language learners. Routledge.
Latifi, S., Noroozi, O., Hatami, J., & Biemans, H. J. (2021). How does online peer feedback improve argumentative essay writing and learning? Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 195-206. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2019.1687005
Link, S., Mehrzad, M., & Rahimi, M. (2022). Impact of automated writing evaluation on teacher feedback, student revision, and writing improvement. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(4), 605-634. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1743323
López-Serrano, S., de Larios, J. R., & Manchón, R. M. (2019). Language reflection fostered by individual L2 writing tasks: Developing a theoretically motivated and empirically based coding system. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(3), 503-527. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000275
Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756-778. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
Rajabalee, Y. B., & Santally, M. I. (2021). Learner satisfaction, engagement and performances in an online module: Implications for institutional e-learning policy. Education and Information Technologies, 26(3), 2623-2656. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10375-1
Rozimela, Y. (2021). Reading-based writing model: A blended learning alternative. English Education: Journal of English Teaching and Research, 6(2), 164-180. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.29407/jetar.v6i2.16992
Saha, M. (2022). From creative to critical writing: effects of structured instructions on learners’ perceived skills development. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 10(1), 1-7. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.12785/jtte/100101
Sawyer, R. K. (2021). The iterative and improvisational nature of the creative process. Journal of Creativity, 31, 1-13. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjoc.2021.100002
Selvaraj, M., & Aziz, A. A. (2019). Systematic review: Approaches in teaching writing skill in ESL classrooms. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 8(4), 450-473. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v8-i4/6564
Staples, S., Gray, B., Biber, D., & Egbert, J. (2023). Writing trajectories of grammatical complexity at the university: Comparing L1 and L2 English writers in BAWE. Applied Linguistics, 44(1), 46-71. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amac047
Strobl, C., Ailhaud, E., Benetos, K., Devitt, A., Kruse, O., Proske, A., & Rapp, C. (2019). Digital support for academic writing: A review of technologies and pedagogies. Computers & Education, 131, 33-48.
Tsai, Y.-R. (2021). Promotion of learner autonomy within the framework of a flipped EFL instructional model: Perception and perspectives. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(7), 979-1011. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1650779
Wong, K.-T., Hwang, G.-J., Choo Goh, P. S., & Mohd Arrif, S. K. (2020). Effects of blended learning pedagogical practices on students’ motivation and autonomy for the teaching of short stories in upper secondary English. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(4), 512-525. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1542318
Zabihi, R., & Bayan, M. (2020). Are two voices better than one? Comparing aspects of text quality and authorial voice in paired and independent L2 writing. Written Communication, 37(4), 512-535. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088320939542
Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2023). A review of research on technology-enhanced peer feedback for second language writing based on the activity theory framework. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6727-6753. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11469-8
Zhang, Z. V. (2020). Engaging with automated writing evaluation (AWE) feedback on L2 writing: Student perceptions and revisions. Assessing Writing, 43, 1-12. Retrieved December 22, 2023 from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.100439