Once Upon a Time: Rewriting Transformation, Identity, and Resistance in Selected Fairy Tales and Realist Literature Works

Authors

  • Naeemah J. Alrasheedi Qassim University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1605.13

Keywords:

fairy tales, realism, identity, transformation, narrative instability

Abstract

Fairy tales have always promised transformation—rags to riches, beast to prince, struggle to reward. But beneath their well-worn endings lie contradictions, moments of quiet defiance where characters push against the boundaries of their worlds. Cinderella and Beauty and the Beast seem to celebrate patience and virtue, yet their symbols—the guiding birds, the enchanted rose—hint at something more complex: the possibility of choice, of agency even in the face of restriction. Kate Chopin’s The Awakening (1899) takes this tension further, stepping beyond the familiar comfort of fairy-tale resolutions. Edna Pontellier’s story does not offer the promise of “happily ever after” but instead lingers in uncertainty, resisting the closure that so often defines traditional narratives. Similarly, Willa Cather’s A Lost Lady (1923) presents Marian Forrester as a woman who does not conform to romanticized ideals, challenging the expectations placed upon her. This study explores how these texts reflect both conformity and the desire for reinvention, drawing on postmodern critiques such as Jean-François Lyotard’s challenge to grand narratives. Through the lens of transformation and identity, these stories remind us that endings are rarely neat, that narratives—like the people who tell and live them—are always shifting, always searching for something more.

Author Biography

Naeemah J. Alrasheedi, Qassim University

Department of English Language and Literature, College of Languages and Humanities

References

Bacchilega, C. (1997). Fairy Tales Transformed? Twenty-First-Century Adaptations and the Politics of Wonder. Harvard University Press.

Bacchilega, C. (2013). Postmodern Fairy Tales: Gender and Narrative Strategies. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity. Polity Press.

Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.

Cather, W. (1923). A Lost Lady. Knopf.

Chopin, K. (1899). The Awakening. Herbert S. Stone & Company.

Elz, A. E. (2003). The Awakening and the Politics of Place. Southern Literary Journal, 35(1), 88-104.

Farr, S. (2019). Revisiting Fairy Tales: Transformation and Identity. Oxford University Press.

Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (1979). The madwoman in the attic: The woman writer and the nineteenth-century literary imagination. Yale University Press.

Gilligan, C. (1982). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Harvard University Press.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1983). The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. University of Minnesota Press.

Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The Differend: Phrases in Dispute. University of Minnesota Press.

Showalter, E. (1977). A literature of their own: British women novelists from Brontë to Lessing. Princeton University Press.

Tatar, M. (1992). Off with Their Heads! Fairy Tales and the Culture of Childhood. Princeton University Press.

Tatar, M. (2004). The Hard Facts of the Grimms' Fairy Tales. Princeton University Press.

Warner, M. (1995). From the Beast to the Blonde: On Fairy Tales and Their Tellers. Vintage.

Welter, B. (1966). The Cult of True Womanhood: 1820-1860. American Quarterly, 18(2), 151-174.

Zipes, J. (2006). Why Fairy Tales Stick: The Evolution and Relevance of a Genre. Routledge.

Zipes, J. (2012). The Irresistible Fairy Tale: The Cultural and Social History of a Genre. Princeton University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-01

Issue

Section

Articles