Exploring EFL Writing Instruction in Polytechnic College Classrooms in China: An Observational Report on Curriculum, Classroom Practices, and Teachers’ Beliefs

Authors

  • Mingjuan Gu Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)
  • Nooreen Noordin Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)
  • Lilliati Ismail Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1606.28

Keywords:

EFL writing instruction, Chinese polytechnic colleges, writing curriculum, teacher beliefs

Abstract

While catering to over a third of tertiary education students in China, English instruction within polytechnic colleges has surprisingly garnered limited attention. This article offers an observational overview of English writing instruction tailored for English majors at a Polytechnic College in China. The investigation uncovered that English writing primarily emphasized the final product, with process-oriented elements present in the curriculum documentation but occupying a marginal role in actual teaching practices. Nonetheless, indications of educators exploring innovative approaches were discernible in their underlying beliefs. Teachers consistently voiced a prevailing emphasis on idea generation and writing precision, yet observed instructional methods demonstrated scant attention to generating ideas, placing a significant focus on language-focused exercises. The study further observed that, owing to large class sizes and the prevalence of online automatic feedback tools, English teachers tended to deliver feedback on several representative text samples openly in class rather than providing personalized feedback to individual students, and the integration of peer feedback was infrequent. These findings prompt a discussion on their implications and potential modifications to writing instruction in Chinese tertiary contexts.

Author Biographies

Mingjuan Gu, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Department of Educational Studies

Nooreen Noordin, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Department of Educational Studies

Lilliati Ismail, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)

Department of Educational Studies

References

Al-Jarrah, R. S., & Al-Ahmad, S. (2013). Writing instruction in Jordan: past, present and future trends. System, 41, 84–94.

CET Committee. (2016). Quanguo daxue yingyu siliuji kaoshi dagang [Syllabus for College English Test (CET) Band Four and Band Six]. Retrieved December 2, 2023, from https://cet.neea.edu.cn/html1/folder/16113/1588-1.htm.

Chang, H. (2020). Zhongguo zhiye jiaoyu waiyu jiaoyu fazhan baogao [Report on the Development of Foreign Language Education in Vocational Education in China (2009-2019)]. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

Chen, M. (2004). Yingyu xiezuo “jieguofa” yu “guochengfa” duibi shiyan yanjiu [Differential effects of “Product Approach” and “Process Approach” on Chinese EFL learners of different writing abilities]. Foreign Language Teaching and Research (bimonthly). Vol 37, No. 6, 460-464.

Graham, S., & Sandmel, K. (2011). The process writing approach- A meta-analysis. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(6), 396-407.

Guo, W., & Bai, B. (2019). Effects of self-regulated learning strategy use on motivation in EFL writing: A comparison between high and low achievers in Hong Kong Primary schools. Applied Linguistics Review. Epub ahead of print 20 July 2019. DOI: 10.1515/applirev-2018-0085.

Hinkel, E. (2015). Effective curriculum for teaching L2 writing. Routledge.

Huang, Y., & Jun Zhang, L. (2020). Does a process-genre approach help improve students’ argumentative writing in English as a foreign language? Findings from an intervention study. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 339-364.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019). Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing. In Hyland K., Hyland F. (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues. New York: Cambridge University Press. 1–22.

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies- A social response to process. Journal of second language writing, 12(1), 17-29.

Jiang, L., Yu, S., Zhou, N., & Xu, Y. (2021). English Writing Instruction in Chinese Students’ Experience: A Survey Study. RELC Journal, 003368822098022. doi10.11770033688220980227.

Lee, I., & Wong, K. (2014). Bringing innovation to EFL writing the case of a primary school in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23, 159-163.

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2021). Gaodeng zhiye jiaoyu zhuanke yingyu kecheng biaozhun [English Curriculum Standards for Higher Vocational Education] (the 2021 Edition). Higher Education Press.

Naghdipour, B. (2016). English writing instruction in Iran: Implications for second language writing curriculum and pedagogy. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 81–87.

Reichelt, M. (2005). English-language writing instruction in Poland. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, 215–232.

Shi, L., Baker, A., & Chen, H. (2019). Chinese EFL teachers' cognition about the effectiveness of genre pedagogy: A case study. RELC Journal, 50(2), 314–332.

Siddiqui, S., Ahamed, M. M., Chowdhury, G., Mishu, A., & Monira, S. (2023). Teaching Writing Skills to EFL Learners: Issues and Concerns. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(6), 1541-1550.

Tardy, C. M. (2011). The history and future of genre in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 20(1), 1–5. doi10.1016j.jslw.2010.12.004

Tarnopolsky, O. (2000). Writing English as a foreign language: a report from Ukraine. Journal of Second Language Writing, 9, 209–226.

Wang, R. & Wang, C. (2020). Houji bofa xuxie huihuan: Wang Chuming jiaoshou fangtanlu [An Interview with Professor Wang Chuming: Insights and Perspectives]. Foreign Language and Literature (bimonthly), 36(2), 6-10.

Wen, Q. (2018). The production-oriented approach to teaching university students English in China. Language Teaching, 51(4), 526-540.

Wen, Q., & Zhang, H. (2021). Gaodeng zhiye jiaoyu zhuanke yingyu kecheng biaozhun chanshi (2021 nian ban): Yanzhi beijing guocheng yu tese [Interpreting English Curriculum Standards for Higher Vocational Education (the 2021 Edition): The Rationale, Development Process and Distinctive Features]. Foreign Languages of China, 5, 4–11.

Wette, R. (2014). Teachers’ practices in EAP writing instruction: Use of models and modeling. System, 42, 60–69.

You, X. (2004). “The choice made from no choice”: English writing instruction in a Chinese university. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(2), 97-110.

Yu, S., Zhou, Y., & Zhang, E. D. (2022). Discourses of writing and learning to write in L2 writing curriculum in Chinese universities. Language Teaching Research. Doi:10.1177//13621688221113929.

Zhang, C., Yan, X., & Liu, X. (2015). The development of EFL writing instruction and research in China: An update from the International Conference on English Language Teaching. Journal of Second Language Writing, 30, 14-18.

Zhang, L. (2016). Reflections on the pedagogical imports of western practices for professionalizing ESLEFL writing and writing teacher education. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 39(3), 203–232.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles