Speech Acts, Figures of Speech, and Their Functions in the 2024 Presidential & Vice-Presidential Debates: A Pragmastylistic Study

Authors

  • Mulyono Mulyono Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Mochamad Bayu Firmansyah Universitas PGRI Wiranegara
  • Anggoro Abiyyu Ristio Cahyo Universitas Negeri Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1701.24

Keywords:

political debate, speech acts, figures of speech, rhetorical strategy, pragmastylistics

Abstract

This study examines the types and functions of speech acts and figures of speech employed by presidential and vice-presidential candidates in the 2024 Indonesian election debates. It also explores the rhetorical functions of figures of speech within political communication strategies, using a pragmastylistic approach. A descriptive qualitative method was employed, with data drawn from utterance excerpts transcribed from five official debates. The data were categorized by pragmatic function and stylistic form, followed by thematic analysis to reveal patterns linking communicative intent and rhetorical style. The results show that presidential candidates primarily used assertive, commissive, and directive speech acts, often accompanied by hyperbole, sarcasm, and parallelism. In contrast, vice-presidential candidates tended to use expressive, directive, and commissive acts, supported by personification, irony, and antithesis. These combinations served to reinforce political stances, construct leadership personas, and express ideological orientations. The findings confirm that speech acts and figures of speech were not used separately but functioned together as strategic tools in persuasive political discourse. The pragmastylistic approach proved effective in uncovering how political language is constructed as an intentional and context-sensitive discursive act.

Author Biographies

Mulyono Mulyono, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Department of Language and Literature Education, Graduate School

Mochamad Bayu Firmansyah, Universitas PGRI Wiranegara

Department of Language Education and Literature, Faculty of Pedagogy and Psychology

Anggoro Abiyyu Ristio Cahyo, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Department of Indonesian Language Education, Faculty of Language and Arts

References

Achmad, S., Miolo, S. T., Katili, A., & Bouti, S. (2023). Identifying Linguistic and Speech Acts Variations of the Buginese Tribe Through Socio-Pragmatic Analysis in Establishing Daily Discourse Interactions. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 14(6), 1698–1709. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1406.29

Al-Shboul, O. K., Al-Khawaldeh, N. N., Hamdan, H. J., & Alqbailat, N. (2024). Macro and Micro Analysis of Motivational Speech Acts in Biden’s Political Speech. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 12(1), 362–373. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2016326.3273

Azam, S. (2024). Pragma-Rhetoric Analysis of Political Discourse: A Case of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif’s Victory Speech. UCP Journal of Languages & Literature, 2(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.24312/ucp-jll.02.01.370

Bohmann, A., & Ahlers, W. (2022). Stance in Narration: Finding Structure in Complex Sociolinguistic Variation. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 26(1), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12533

Busairi, M. (2023). Satir imitasi dalam parodi Republik Sentilan Sentilun: Kajian pragmastilistika [Imitative satire in the parody of Republik Sentilan Sentilun: A pragma-stylistic study]. Mabasan: Masyarakat Bahasa & Sastra Nusantara, 17(1), 79–96. https://doi.org/10.26499/mab.v17i1.647

Dawudi, D. A., Nurhadi, D., & Pratita, I. I. (2020). Ungkapan cinta dalam Suluk Kanan Nabi: Kajian pragmastilistika [Expressions of love in Suluk Kanan Nabi: A pragma-stylistic study]. Tafhim Al-‘Ilmi : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam, 16(1), 121–236. https://doi.org/10.37459/tafhim.v16i01.206

Fischer, A., Joosse, S., Strandell, J., Söderberg, N., Johansson, K., & Boonstra, W. J. (2024). How Justice Shapes Transition Governance–a Discourse Analysis of Swedish Policy Debates. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67(9), 1998–2016. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2023.2177842

Fordjour, N. K. O., & Sikanku, G. E. (2022). Vice-Presidential Candidates, Language Frames, and Functions Across Two Continental Divides: An Analysis of Acceptance Speeches. International Journal of Communication, 16(1), 864–882. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/18056

Gozali, J., Mansoor, A. Z., & Satria, F. (2025). Study of the visual rhetoric of advertising in the BCA campaign “Don’t know? Kasih No!” (Audio visual version). Serat Rupa: Journal of Design, 9(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.28932/srjd.v9i1.8994

Ilma, A., Hindun, H., Nailatunnajah, N., & Sabirin, A. B. (2024). Anies Baswedan’s speech style and rhetorical usage in the 2024 election dispute lawsuit speech. Geram: Jurnal Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 12(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.25299/geram.2024.vol12(1).17087 143

Kasirzadeh, A., & Gabriel, I. (2023). In Conversation with Artificial Intelligence: Aligning language Models with Human Values. Philosophy and Technology, 36(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00606-x

Keraf, G. (2007). Diksi dan Gaya Bahasa [Diction and language style]. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Khasanah, U., & Muslim, M. (2025). Penggunaan majas perbandingan dalam novel Luka Cita karya Valerie Patkar [Use of comparative figures of speech in the novel Luka Cita by Valerie Patkar]. Lingua Franca: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 4(1), 29–38. https://doi.org/10.37680/lingua

Khater, H. A., Altakhaineh, A. R. M., & Dahnous, F. (2024). Pragmatic analysis of King Abdullah’s speech: exploring speech acts and societal context. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2433879

Lewiński, M. (2021). Illocutionary pluralism. Synthese, 199(3–4), 6687–6714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03087-7

Mao, T., & He, S. (2021). An Integrated Approach to Pragmatic Competence: Its Framework and Properties. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472

Mardiana, D., Rokhman, F., Rustono, & Mardikantoro, H. B. (2025). Speech Act of Political Figures in the Discourse of Educational Development: an Interpersonal Pragmatic Approach. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2463728

Mulyono, M., Laksono, K., Wuryaningrum, R., & Cahyo, A. A. R. (2025). The Application of Politeness Principles in Speech Acts in the 2024 Presidential Election Debate. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2025.2495479

Mulyono, M., Rhubido, D., Kusumaningsih, D., Mukhzamilah, M., Yuliyanto, A., & Cahyo, A. A. R. (2025). The Functions of Vulgar Language in Basa Suroboyoan During Social Interactions Within Urban Communities. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(8), 2759–2769. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1508.34

Nawab, H. U., Jamil, S., & Ullah, K. (2025). Language, Politics, and Power: Unveiling Putin’s Annexation Narrative through Fairclough’s Model. Journal of Social Science Archives, 8(1), 37–49. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5290126

Nordensvard, J., & Ketola, M. (2022). Populism as an Act of Storytelling: Analyzing the Climate Change Narratives of Donald Trump and Greta Thunberg as Populist Truth-tellers. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 861–882. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2021.1996818

Rahmanda, N. F., Yohanes, B., & Mintowati, M. (2024). Pendidikan Karakter melalui Strategi Penggunaan Snobisme dalam Wacana Humor pada Akun Instagram Nopek Novian: Kajian Pragmastilistika. Jurnal Education and Development Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, 12(1), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v12i1.5423

Rasheed, M., Imran, D. S., & Ullah, D. R. (2024). A Critical Discourse Analysis of the Discursive Strategies Employed in the United States Presidential Debates of 2016. Al-Mahdi Research Journal (MRJ), 5(4), 525–536. https://ojs.mrj.com.pk/index.php/MRJ/article/view/373

RI, K. (2023a, December 12). Debat Pertama Calon Presiden Pemilu Tahun 2024 [First Presidential Debate of the 2024 Election] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNO0YS846kU&t=3532s (accessed July 3, 2025)

RI, K. (2023b, December 22). Debat Kedua Calon Wakil Presiden Pemilu Tahun 2024 [Second Vice Presidential Debate of the 2024 Election] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YzC828FYrwM&t=1740s (accessed July 7, 2025)

RI, K. (2024a, January 7). Debat Ketiga Calon Presiden Pemilu Tahun 2024 [Third Presidential Debate of the 2024 Election] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KJdt-HBBGIo (accessed July 14, 2025)

RI, K. (2024b, January 21). Debat Keempat Calon Wakil Presiden Pemilu Tahun 2024 [Fourth Vice Presidential Debate of the 2024 Election] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=anuQxiXpQ7I&t=11s (accessed July 20, 2025)

RI, K. (2024c, February 4). Debat Kelima Calon Presiden Pemilu Tahun 2024 [Fifth Presidential Debate of the 2024 Election] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8J66JxvmEzo (accessed July 25, 2025)

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213

Shahi, B. M. V. (2022). Pragmatic Competence of Iranian EFL Learners in the Light of Refusal Speech Act. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(1), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.17507/JLTR.1301.07

Shahid, S. (2025). The Pragmatics of Encouragement: An Inquiry Into Defaults Vis-à-vis Inferences. Journal of Pragmatics, 237(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.013

Sutrisno, D., Martina, M., Karsana, D., Annury, M. N., Adri, A., Damayanti, W., Nurhidayah, A. M., & Juliastuty, D. (2024). Semiotic Analysis of Psycholinguistic Strategies in Indonesian President Candidates’ Debates 2024: Unraveling Linguistic Signifiers and Mental Processes in Argumentative Discourse. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 65(5), 943–976. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i5.7251

Tajeddin, Z., & Bagherkazemi, M. (2021). Implicit and Explicit Pragmatic Learning Strategies: Their Factorial Structure and Relationship with Speech Act Knowledge. TESL-EJ, 25(3), 1–28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1331742

Tashiro, A., Imamura, M., Kumano, S., & Otsuka, K. (2023). Analyzing and Recognizing Interlocutors’ Gaze Functions from Multimodal Nonverbal Cues. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, 1(1), 33–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3577190.3614152

Warren, E., & Call, J. (2022). Inferential Communication: Bridging the Gap Between Intentional and Ostensive Communication in Non-human Primates. Hypothesis and Theory, 12(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.718251

Widiastuti, Y., Santoso, A., & Sumadi, S. (2024). Presupposition of repetition speech flavour in Denny Sumargo’s podcast with Laura Anna. KEMBARA: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 10(2), 402–413. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v10i2.29972

Widjaya, S. F. (2021). Bahasa rinengga dalam pertunjukan wayang kulit lakon Temuruning Wahyu Toh Jali oleh dhalang Ki Ali Mudho Siswoko: Kajian pragmastilistika [Figurative language in the Wayang Kulit performance Temuruning Wahyu Toh Jali by puppeteer Ki Ali Mudho Siswoko: A pragmastylistic study]. Jurnal Online Baradha, 17(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.26740/job.v17n3.p1265-1282

Yuwono, P. P., Pairin, U., & Nuryanta, B. (2021). Tuturan dalam kotbah pendeta di Gereja Kristen Jawi Wetan Kota Surabaya [Speech acts in the sermons of pastors at the Gereja Kristen Jawi Wetan in Surabaya City]. Jurnal Education and Development, 9(3), 311–315. https://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/view/2860

Downloads

Published

2026-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles