Readers' Engagement With and Perception of AI-Generated Narratives in the Context of Digital Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1701.33Keywords:
AI-generated narratives, authorship disclosure, digital literature, reader engagement, narrative perceptionAbstract
With the growing capabilities of advanced language models, artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly contributing to storytelling, raising questions about narrative coherence, emotional resonance, and the impact of authorship disclosure. The research explores how readers engage with and perceive AI-generated narratives in the evolving landscape of digital literature. It examines six key factors: Narrative Coherence (NC), Emotional Resonance (ER), Disclosure of AI Authorship (DAI), Reader Engagement (RE), Narrative Preference (NP), and Narrative Genre Preference (NGP) through a structured survey of 500 participants using a five-point Likert scale. The research has used the SPSS-29 and considers statistical methods like ANOVA, Chi-Square tests, and descriptive statistics. Hypothetical pathway analysis was employed to evaluate reader responses and identify significant patterns. Findings reveal that NC and ER positively influence RE, while DAI negatively affects NP. Among all hypotheses tested, the most significant was H5, demonstrating that reader engagement strongly enhances narrative preference (β = 0.47, p = 0.000). ANOVA results confirmed meaningful engagement differences across demographic groups (F = 4.73, p = 0.003), and Chi-Square tests indicated significant associations for all six variables, especially DAI (χ² = 15.87, p = 0.0001). Descriptive statistics highlighted high overall scores for NC and RE, and mixed responses for DAI. These results emphasize the importance of emotional and structural quality in AI storytelling and illustrates reader sensitivity to machine authorship. The research contributes to the understanding of AI's role in narrative creation and offers a data-driven framework for designing engaging, emotionally compelling, and contextually aware AI-generated literature.
References
Belda-Medina, J. (2024). Inclusive education through digital comic creation in higher learning environments. Social Sciences, 13(5), 272. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13050272
Blyler, A. P., & Seligman, M. E. (2024). Personal narrative and stream of consciousness: an AI approach. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 19(4), 592-598. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2023.2257666
Bostrom, Nick. (2020) Ethical issues in advanced artificial intelligence. Machine Ethics and Robot Ethics, 69-75. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003074991-7
Carlini, N., Tramer, F., Wallace, E., Jagielski, M., Herbert-Voss, A., Lee, K., & Raffel, C. (2021, August). Extracting Training Data from Large Language Models. In USENIX Security Symposium (Vol. 6).
de Lima, E. S., Neggers, M. M., Feijó, B., Casanova, M. A., & Furtado, A. L. (2025). An AI-powered approach to the semiotic reconstruction of narratives. Entertainment Computing, 52, 100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.entcom.2024.100810
Floridi, L. (2025). Content Studies: A New Academic Discipline for Analysing, Evaluating, and Designing Content in a Digital and AI-Driven Age. Philosophy & Technology, 38(2), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00877-6
Gabino-Campos, M., Baile, J. I., & Padilla-Martínez, A. (2025). Social biases in AI-generated creative texts: A mixed-methods approach in the Spanish context. Social Sciences, 14(3), 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14030170
Getenet, S., Haeusler, C., Redmond, P., Cantle, R., & Crouch, V. (2024). First-year preservice teachers’ understanding of digital technologies and their digital literacy, efficacy, attitude, and online learning engagement: Implication for course design. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29(3), 1359-1383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09724-z
Jiang, J., Vetter, M. A., & Lucia, B. (2024). Toward a ‘more-than-digital’ AI literacy: Reimagining agency and authorship in the postdigital era with ChatGPT. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(3), 922-939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00477-1
Kim, H. J., Hong, A. J., & Song, H. D. (2018). The relationships of family, perceived digital competence and attitude, and learning agility in sustainable student engagement in higher education. Sustainability, 10(12), 4635. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120463
Lee, S. (2020). Create Mind-Blowing Screenplays with the assistance of artificial intelligence.: An Introduction to Artificial Intelligence Assisted Screenwriting. https://www.amazon.in/Blowing-Screenplays-assistance-artificial-intelligence-ebook/dp/B0DC4TJ18B
Mastrothanasis, K., Pikoulis, E., Kladaki, M., Pikouli, A., Karamagioli, E., & Papantoniou, D. (2025). Digital Drama-Based Interventions in Emergency Remote Teaching: Enhancing Bilingual Literacy and Psychosocial Support During Polycrisis. Psychology International, 7(2), 53. https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7020053
Najafov, E. (2024). Visual Narratives: The Future of AI-Generated Marketing Videos. In ChatGPT for Marketing: Learn Practical Applications of ChatGPT for Marketing (pp. 121-131). Berkeley, CA: Apress. https://doi.org/10.1007/979-8-8688-0312-3_6
Nakamura, K., Ishihara, M., Horikoshi, I., & Ogata, H. (2024). Uncovering insights from big data: change point detection of classroom engagement. Smart Learning Environments, 11(1), 31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00317-6
Raffloer, G., & Green, M. (2025). Of Love & Lasers: Perceptions of Narratives by AI Versus Human Authors. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 100168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100168
Regalado, F., Vale Costa, L., Martins, F., & Veloso, A. I. (2021). Gamifying online news in a senior online community: insights from designing and assessing the readers’ experience. Social Sciences, 10(12), 463. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10120463
Saddhono, K., Judijanto, L., Pasaribu, A. N., Muliastuti, L., Hartanto, W., & Azizah, A. (2024, November). AI and The Future of Fiction: Exploring Narratives Beyond Human Imagination. In 2024 International Conference on IoT, Communication and Automation Technology (ICICAT) (pp. 748-754). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICICAT62666.2024.10922794
Santhosh, J., Pai, A. P., & Ishimaru, S. (2024). Toward an interactive reading experience: Deep learning insights and visual narratives of engagement and emotion. IEEE Access, 12, 6001-6016. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3350745
Sardinha, T. B. (2024). AI-generated vs human-authored texts: A multidimensional comparison. Applied Corpus Linguistics, 4(1), 100083. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100083
Walia, R., & Jain, K. (2023). Algorithmic alchemy: The transformative power of AI in shaping media narratives. International Journal for Multidimensional Research Perspectives, 1(3), 239-247.
Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2024). What rationale would work? Unfolding the role of learners’ attitudes and motivation in predicting learning engagement and perceived learning outcomes in MOOCs. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00433-2
Welsen, S., Wanatowski, D., & Zhao, D. (2023). Behavior of Science and Engineering Students to Digital Reading: Educational Disruption and Beyond. Education Sciences, 13(5), 484. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050484
Zhao, L., Li, S., & Su, Y. S. (2024). Exploring college students’ reading effectiveness for different types of micro-reading activities. Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8793-8816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12138-0