Unraveling Contradictions: Which Glosses Facilitate Reading Comprehension Among ELLs, and Why?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1301.01Keywords:
glossing, gloss types, gloss presentation, gloss language, glossing literature reviewAbstract
This critical literature review provides study details for 36 studies examining the effect of glossing for language acquisition among English language learners (ELLs). Useful tables include specificity of participants, gloss types, target vocabulary items and text information about all studies. An analysis of these studies reveals that glossing is an effective means to enhance reading comprehension among ELLs. However, gloss language—whether L1 or English, may depend on learner factors. Other findings include the importance of proximity of gloss to text and the need for glosses that do not require readers to leave the text to access meaning. Considerations such as text genre, text length, targeted items for glossing, number of items to gloss, and gloss presentation are also examined and discussed, including which gloss types may result in trade-offs when glossing is used as a means to promote incidental vocabulary acquisition through independent reading. Several recommendations for further research are offered.
References
Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220802090246
AbuSeileek, A. (2008). Hypermedia annotation presentation: learners’ preferences and effect on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 25(2), 1-15.
Akbulut, Y. (2007). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 32, 499-517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-007-9016-7
Al Ghafli (2011). The effect of mediated glosses on vocabulary retention and reading comprehension with English language learners in Saudi Arabia (Publication No. 11413) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Alharbi (2018). The impact of glossed texts on reading comprehension among tertiary Saudi students. English Language Teaching, 11(3), 153-161. http://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n3p153
Arpaci (2016). The effects of accessing L1 versus L2 definitional glosses on L2 learners' reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(1), 15-29.
Azari, F. (2013). Effects of textual glosses on text comprehension, vocabulary gain and vocabulary retention among tertiary level Persian-speaking ESL learners. (Publication No. FBMK 2013 22) [Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Putra Malaysia].
Azari, F., Abdullah, F., & Hoon, T. B. (2012). Effects of textual glosses on reading comprehension of low proficiency EFL postgraduates. The English Teacher, XLI (1), 42-55.
Babaie Shalmani, H., & Razmjopo, S. A. (2015). Multimedia annotation: Comparability of gloss modalities and their implications for reading comprehension. Journal of English Language Teaching and Learning, 15. Article 15.
Babaie Shalmani, H., & Sabet, M. K. (2010). Pictorial, textual, and picto-textual glosses in e-reading: A comparative study. English Language Teaching, 3(4), 195-203.
Bell, F., & LeBlanc, L. B. (2000). The language of glosses in L2 reading on computer: Learners' preferences. Hispania, 83(2) 274-285.
Blom, A. H. (2017). Glossing the Psalms: The emergence of the written vernaculars in Western Europe from the seventh to the twelfth centuries. De Gruyter.
Çakmak, F., & Erçetin, G. (2018). Effects of gloss type and text recall and incidental vocabulary learning in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 24-47.
Cha (2007). Facilitating effect of online dictionary glossing on vocabulary learning and reading comprehension for EFL learners. Multimedia Assisted Language Learning, 10(3), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.15702/MALL.2007.10.3.9
Chang, Y-F. (2006). On the use of the immediate recall task as a measure of second language reading comprehension. Language Testing, 23(4), 520-543. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532206lt340oa
Chen, I-J., & Yen, J-C. (2013). Hypertext annotation: Effects of presentation formats and learner proficiency on reading comprehension and vocabulary learning in foreign languages. Computers & Education, 63, 416-423. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.01.005
Chen, I-J. (2016). Hypertext glosses for foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition: Effects of assessment methods. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29(2), 413-426. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.983935
Cheng, Y-H., & Good, R. L. (2009). L21 glosses: Effects on EFL learners' reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(2), 119-142.
Crosson, B., Ford, A., McGregor, K. M., Meinzer, M., Cheshkov, S., Li, X., Walker-Batson, D., Briggs, R. W. (2010). Functional imaging and related techniques: An introduction for rehabilitation researchers. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 47(2), vii–xxxiv. https://doi.org/doi:10.1682/jrrd.2010.02.001
Davaribina, M., Shabani Minaabad, M., & Orooji, N. (2016). The effect of graphic organizers and marginal glossing on reading comprehension of texts with sequential structure. Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods, 6(6), 461-470.
Davis, J. N. (1989). Facilitating effects of marginal glosses on foreign language reading. The Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 41-48.
De Ridder, I. (2002). Visible or invisible links: does the highlighting of hyperlinks affect incidental vocabulary learning, text comprehension, and the reading process? Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 123-146.
Dehdari, E., & Sadeghoghlo, H. (2018). Comparing effect of concept mapping and marginal glossing on EFL learners' reading comprehension and vocabulary retention. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 5(1), 328-338.
Dilenschneider, R. F. (2017). Examining the conditions of using an on-line dictionary to learn words and comprehend texts. ReCALL, 30(1), 4-23.
Elekaei, A., Faramarzi, S., & Koosha, M. (2015). The impact of gloss types on reading comprehension, vocabulary gain and vocabulary retention: A comparative study. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(5), 97-103. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.5p.97
Fahimipour, N., & Hashemian, M. (2013). The effect of lexical glossing types on reading and listening skills of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(1), 192-199. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.4.1.192-199
Farvardin, M. T., & Biria, R. (2011). Textual glosses, text types, and reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(10), 1408-1415. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.1.10.1408-1415
Gardner, D. (2007). Children's immediate understanding of vocabulary: Contexts and dictionary definitions. Reading Psychology, 28(4), 331-373. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710701260508
Genette, G., & Maclean, M. (1991). Introduction to paratext. New Literary History, 22(2), 261-272. https://doi.org/10.2307/469037
Gunobgunob-Mirasol, R. (2014). The relative effect of glossing instruction on college students' reading comprehension. 3rd International Conference on Linguistics, Literature and Culture (pp. 82-90). Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Hamdi, C. (2015). The effects of electronic dictionary use on reading comprehension and vocabulary retention of EFL students. In K. Al-Zubaidi (Ed.), Bejaia University First International Conference Proceedings (pp. 180-191). Arab World English Journal.
Hashemian, M., & Fadaei, B. (2013). The effect of lexical glossing types on Persian L2 learners' reading and listening. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 490-500.
Jenpattarakul, W. (2012). Does glossing affect Thai EFL students' reading comprehension and lexis acquisition? Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 3(11), 111-118. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2012.v3n11p111
Juliana. (2018). The comparative impacts of using lexical glossing and inferencing strategies on students' reading comprehension. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 9(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.1p.1
Jung, J., & Révész, A. (2018). The effects of reading activity characteristics on L2 reading processes and noticing of glossed construction. The effects of reading activity characteristics on L2 reading processes and noticing of glossed constructions. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(4), 755-780.
Kaivanpanah, S., & Alavi, M. (2008). Deriving unknown word meaning from context: Is it reliable? RELC Journal, 39(1), 77-95.
Kang, H., Kweon, S-O., & Choi, S. (2020). Using eye-tracking to examine the role of first and second language glosses. Language Teaching Research. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168820928567
Karbalaei, A., & Zare, A. (2019). A comparison of the effect of textual, audio, and textual-pictorial and audio-pictorial annotations on enhancing reading comprehension among Iranian EFL learners. Teaching English with Technology, 19(3), 40-67.
Karimvand, M. (2019). The effect of gloss on EFL learners' reading comprehension. Specialty Journal of Language Studies and Literature, 3(2), 38-43.
Karimvand, M. (2020). The effect of different types of marginal glossing (first language & second language) and pictorial glossing on Iranian and Turkish English as a foreign language learners' reading comprehension. PJAEE, 17(9), 9301-9317.
Kazandjian, K. W. (2017). The effect of semantic learners mapping and lexical glossing on reading comprehension of Egyptian EFL. Hermes, 6(1), 43-96. https://doi.org/10.21608/herms.2017.76966
Kelley, J. G., Lesaux, N. K., Kieffer, M. J., & Faller, S. E. (2010). Effective academic vocabulary instruction in the urban middle school. The Reading Teacher, 64(1), 5-14. https://doi.org/10.1598/RT.64.1.1
Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners' vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j-system.2017.01.009
Kim, H. S., Lee, J. H., & Lee, H. (2020). The relative effects of L1 and L2 glosses on L2 learning: A meta-analysis. Language Teaching Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168820981394
Ko, M. H. (2005). Glosses, comprehension, and strategy use. Reading in a Foreign Language, 17(2), 125-143.
Kongtawee, P., & Sappapan, P. (2018). The effects of L1 and L2 hypertext glosses on reading comprehension and vocabulary retention among Thai secondary school students. Arab World English Journal, 9(3), 367-380. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no3.24
Lee, H., Lee, H., & Lee, J. H. (2016). Evaluation of electronic and paper textual glosses on second language vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Asia-Pacific Educational Research, 25(4), 499-507. https://doi.org/10/1007/s40299-015-0270-1
Levine, A., Bejarano, Y., Carrell, P., & Vered, L. (2004). Comparing dictionary definitions and glosses in hypertext foreign language reading: Facilitating foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. CATESOL Journal, 16(1), 59-68.
Lomicka (1998). To gloss or not to gloss: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 41-50.
Loucky, J. P., & Tuzi, F. (2010). Comparing foreign language learners’ use of online glossing programs. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments, 1(4), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2010100103
Magreehan, D. A. (2016). Presentation of electronic glosses: Effects on student learning and monitoring from text. (Publication No. 73659) [Doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Majuddin, E. (2014). The effects of differing densities of glossing on vocabulary uptake and reading comprehension. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 5(6), 132-152. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.6p.132
Marefat, H., Rezaee, A. A., & Naserieh, F. (2016). Effect of computerized gloss presentation format on reading comprehension: A cognitive load perspective. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 479-501
Marzban, A. (2011). Investigating the role of multimedia annotations in EFL reading comprehension. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, 72-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.015
Melhi, (2014). Effects on predictability of computer-mediated glosses in reading comprehension of EFL college students. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 14(2), 65-77.
O’Donnell, M. E. (2012). Second language learners’ use of marginal glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 45(4), 543-563. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2013.12004.x
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de psychologie, 45(3), 255-287.
Pathan, H., Khatoon, S., Arslan Raheem, M., Dar, F., & Mushtaq, F. (2021). Impacts of multimedia gloss on learning reading comprehension in ESL context. Ilkogretim Online - Elementary Education Online. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.03.22
Restrepo Ramos, F. D. (2015). Incidental vocabulary learning in second language acquisition: A literature review. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 17(1), 157-166. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.43957
Rott, S. (2007). The effect of frequency of input-enhancements on world learning and text comprehension. Language Learning, 57(2), 165-199.
Sadeghi, K., & Ahmadi, N. (2012). The effect of gloss type and mode on Iranian EFL learners' reading comprehension. English Language Teaching, 5(12), 100-110. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n12p100
Sadeghi, K., Khezrlou, S., & Modirkhameneh, S. (2017). Calling Iranian learners of L2 Eng. different learning conditions. Journal of Research in Reading, 40(1), 566-586. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12088
Sakar, A., & Erçetin, G. (2005). Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21(1), 28-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00108.x
Salimi, E. A., & Elham Sadat, M. (2019). The effect of L1 glosses for abstract words on English reading comprehension. Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 19(1), 181-196.
Sarabi, Z. R., & Beheshti, S. (2012). The effect of graphic organizers and marginal L2 glossing training on the reading comprehension of ESP students. Researcher, 4(4), 16-23.
Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary. University of Nottingham.
Stewart, R. A., & Cross, T. L. (1991). The effect of marginal glosses on reading comprehension and retention. Journal of Reading, 35(1), 4-12.
Taylor, A. M. (2002). A meta-analysis on the effects of L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. (Publication No. 3099215) [Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Taylor, A. (2006). The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 309-218.
Taylor, A. (2013). CALL versus paper: In which context are L1 glosses more effective? CALICO Journal, 30(1), 63-81. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.30.1.63-81
Taylor, A. M. (2014). Glossing frequency and L2 reading comprehension: The influence of CALL glossing. CALICO Journal, 31(3), 374-389. https://doi.org/10.11139/cj.31.3.374-389
Taylor, A. M. (2020). Technology and reading: The effects of CALL glossing. Psychological Reports, 124(5), 2092-2118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033294120954139
Taylor, A. M. (2010). Glossing is sometimes a distraction: Comments on Cheng and Good (2009). Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(2), 353-354.
Türk, E., & Erçetin, G. (2014). Effects of interactive versus simultaneous display of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.692384.
Varol, B., & Erçetin, G. (2016). Effects of working memory and gloss type on L2 text comprehension and incidental vocabulary learning in computer-based reading. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Science, 232, 759-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.103
Vela, V. (2015). Using glosses for incidental vocabulary acquisition. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 305-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.551
Wang & Lee (2021). Multimedia gloss presentation: Learners’ preference and the effects on EFL vocabulary learning and reading comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.602520
Yanguas, I. (2009). Multimedia glosses and their effect on L2 text comprehension and vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 13(2), 48-67.
Zarei, A. A., & Mahmoodzadeh, P. (2014). The effect of multimedia glosses on L2 reading comprehension and vocabulary production. Journal of English Language and Literature, 1(1), 1-7.
Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2008). Test review: College English Test (CET) in China. Language Testing, 25, 408-417. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532208092433
Zolfagharijjooya, S., Jafarigohar, M., & Soleiman, H. (2013). The differential effects of glossing for different parts of speech on vocabulary retention and reading comprehension. International Journal of English and Education, 2(3), 346-360.
