Affordances and Common Grounds in Buyer-Seller Interactions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1302.07Keywords:
affordances, interaction, common ground, presupposition, buyer-sellerAbstract
This study examines the interactions between buyers and sellers in the market setting using the common ground theoretical framework. From the existing literature, it is observed that no research work has examined the above subject matter in the Igbo language using the above mentioned theoretical framework. This is the lacuna in the literature that this study intends to address. The specific objective is to explore the interactions between presuppositions, stages of understanding an utterance and reception strategies in buyer-seller interactions during haggling. Ten interactions were recorded and three of them were sampled in this study. The data were analyzed using the common ground theory. The findings of the study reveal that both the seller and buyer often have the generic structure of buyer-seller interactions in their subconscious, which they put into practice when they engage in market discourse. Also, the buyers and sellers update their personal or emergent common ground as they negotiate meaning during interactions. Furthermore, as the result of the common ground shared by the buyer and the seller, they interpret every utterance based on the affordances of a speech event in a market setting where a buyer is under no obligation to buy after haggling nor is the seller obligated to sell. It also discovers that presupposition is at the heart of grounding because at every interactive turn, a speaker believes that the addressee understands his/ her intentions. The researcher recommends further research on the pragmatic implications for the use of multiple codes during buyer-seller interactions in Igbo land.
References
Aboh, S. C. (2018). Communicating post-truth ideologies in Nigerian cities: A discourse historical analysis. Unpublished M.A. Seminar Paper, Department of Linguistics, Igbo and Other Nigerian Languages, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
Ajayi, T. M. (2017). Unvelling of sexual literature in the Beulah Yoruda/English Bilingual Parallei Bible. Africology: The Journal of Pan African Studies. vol. 10, no. 1, 309-324.
Allan, K. (2013). Common ground. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Alo, M. A. & Soneye, T. O. (2014). Haggling as a socio-pragmatic strategy in selected urban markets: An amalgam of English and Nigerian languages. Marang, 24, 43-62.
Ayoola, K. (2009). Haggling exchanges at meat stalls in some markets in Lagos, Nigeria. Discourse Studies, 11(4), 387-400.
Bamgbose, G. A. (2019). Common ground theory. In A. B. Sunday & F. O. Egbokhare (Eds.), Contemporary issues in language studies (pp. 187-196). Ibadan: Scholarship Publishers (Nig.).
Beaver, D. I. (1997). Presupposition. In J. van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (Eds.), Handbook of logic and language pp. 939–1008. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493-525. Chakrani, B. (2007). Cultural context and speech act theory: A socio-pragmatic analysis of bargaining exchanges in Morocco. Texas Linguistics Forum, 51, 43-53.
Clark, H. H. & Brennan, S. E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levin, S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspective on socially shared cognition pp. 127-149. Washington: APA Books.
Clark, H. H. & Schaefer, E. R. (1989). Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 13, 259-294.
Clark, H. H. (1996). Using language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Clark, H. H. (2006). Context and common ground. In J. Mey (eds.), Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics pp. 116-119. Oxford: Elsevier.
Duranti, A. (1997). Linguistic anthropology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. London: Longman.
Heim, I. (1983). On the projection problem for presuppositions. West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 114–125. Republished in 1991 S. Davis (Ed.), Pragmatics: A reader pp, 397-405. New York: Oxford University Press.
Jatmiko, H. T., Setiawan, B & Sulistyo, E. T. (2018). The language function in oral discourse a sell-buy transaction in Klewer market Surakarta and its relevance as Indonesian learning materials in senior high school. Proceeding of 2nd International Conference of Arts Language and Culture, 478-494.
Kecskes, I. & Zhang, F. (2013). On the dynamic relations between common ground and presupposition. In A. Capone (ed.), Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics pp. 375-395. Hague: Springer International Publishing.
Kecskes, I., & Zhang, F. (2009). Activating, seeking and creating common ground: A sociocognitive approach. Pragmatics and Cognition, 17(2), 331–355.
Lampi, M. (1993). Discourse organization and power: Towards a pragmatics of sales negotiation. Pragmatics and Language Learning, 4, 195-208.
Long, K. L. (2012). Discourse features of vendor-customer interaction in a transactional setting in Sibu. Unpublished M.A. dissertation, Centre for Language Studies, University of Malaysia, Sarawak.
Mey, J. L. (2001). Pragmatics: An introduction (2nd ed.). Oxford. New York.
Mitchell, T. F. (1957). The language of buying and selling in Cyrenaica: a situational statement. Hesperis, 26, 31–71.
Monk, A. F. (2003). Common ground in electronically mediated communication: Clark’s theory of language use. In J. M. Carroll (ed) HCI models, theories and frameworks: Towards a multidisciplinary science (pp. 265-289). San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Morsy, H. M. (2017). Buyer-seller relationship and power position: Interchanging. International Journal of Supply and Operations Management, 4(1), 33-52.
Odebunmi, A. (2008). Pragmatic functions of crisis-motivated proverbs in Ola Rotimi’s The Gods are not to blame. Linguistik Online, 33(1), 23-35.
Odebunmi, A. (2015). Omoluabi. In J. Ostman, & P. Verschueren (Eds.) Handbook of pragmatics (pp. 1-13). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Stalnaker, R. C. (1974). Pragmatic presuppositions. In M. K. Munitz & P. K. Unger (Eds.), Semantics and philosophy pp. 197–214. New York: New York University Press.
Stalnaker, R. C. (1978). Assertion. Syntax and Semantics, 9, 315–332.
Suwandi, S. (2008). Serbalinguistik: Mengupas Pelbagai Praktik Berbahasa. Surakarta: UNSPRESS.
Temitope, S. A. (2015). Common ground theory: Principles and applications. Unpublished PhD Seminar Paper, Department of English, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). Discourse semantics and ideology. Discourse & Society, 6(2), 243 -289.
Vandergriff, I. (2006). Negotiating common ground in computer-mediated versus face-to-face discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 10(1), 110-138.
Vandergrift, L. (2007). Listening comprehension in L2/FL learning. Language Teaching, 40, 191-210.
Von Fintel, K. (2006). What is Presupposition accommodation, again? Draft paper for Workshop on Presupposition Accommodation at The Ohio State University.
Wodak, R. (1996). Orders of discourse. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
