CALL Project-Based Program to Enhance Student-Teachers’ TEFL Skills
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.05Keywords:
student-teachers, Constructoactive Model, CALL, Top-down/Bottom-up ApproachesAbstract
Students-teachers are students who study to become Teaching English as a Foreign language (TEFL) teachers. They receive teaching trainings, observe certified teachers’ teachings performance, and do some supervised teaching practices in EFL classrooms for the elementary and secondary stages. The current study aims at presenting a supplementary program to support a practical course on methods of teaching English as a foreign language for the elementary stage. The supplementary program has been developed by the researcher to enhance Arab Open University (AOU) student-teachers’ skills of teaching listening, speaking, reading, writing, and vocabulary for elementary stage pupils through a language project that focuses on instilling social values in these young pupils. This was mainly done with samples of practical examples, interactive discussions and tasks of practical nature posted on Learning Management System (LMS) following Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) methodology in accordance with the Intended Learning Outcomes (ILOs) of the course. The study has adopted the Constructoactive Model developed by Sahakian and Ghoneim (2007) to promote pupils’ knowledge of different methods of teaching English as a foreign language and to familiarize young pupils with good social values and their related vocabulary items. In addition, the supplementary program has adopted Stoller's (1997) model for developing project work. The model has proved to be helpful in promoting the student-teachers’ performance in teaching different language skills, writing lesson plans and giving demo class presentations for the developed lesson plans by using PowerPoint/Prezi presentations, open-source video/audio links and a number of software programs (such as Kahoot, Quizlet, and Grammarly).
References
Abdel-Majeed, M. M. (2017). Computer assisted language learning: models and applications. English Language Unit, Qatar University. Retried August 2022 from https://qspace.qu.edu.qa/handle/10576/8369
Alan, B. & Stoller, F.L. (2005). Maximizing the benefits of project work in foreign language classrooms. English Teaching Forum, 43(4), 10-21.
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). Alternatives in assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587999
Bulut, A. (2010). English teacher’s barriers to the use of CALL in university EFL classes. Cukurova University. Retrieved December 2020 from http://www.geocities.com/musician_a_b/Important_files/project_2.htm
Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). Alternatives in assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653-675. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587999
Chard, S. (1998). The project approach: developing the basic framework practical guide 1. Scholastic.
Davies G. & Steel D. (1981). First steps in computer-assisted language learning at Ealing College of Higher Education. Paper presented at the CAL 81 Symposium, University of Leeds, 8-10 April 1981. Published as part of an article, Micros in modern languages, Educational Computing, October 1982, 30-31.
Davies G., Walker R., Rendall H., & Hewer, S. (2012). Introduction to computer assisted language learning (CALL), ICT4LT module 1.4. In G. Davies (Ed.), Information and Communications Technology for Language Teachers (ICT4LT). Slough, Thames Valley University. Retrieved December 2020 from http://www.ict4lt.org/en/en_mod1-4.htm
Dhaif, H. A.(1989).Can computers teach languages? English teaching forum, 27(3), 7-19.
Fried-Booth, Diana (2002). “Project Work.” OUP Forum 16, 15-22. https://archive.org/stream/ERICED578161/ERICED578161djvu.txt
Kenning M.-M. & Kenning M. J. (1990). Computers and language learning: Current theory and practice. Ellis Horwood.
Milad, M. (2020). Developing productive skills through an interactive approach: present to learn.” International Journal of Education, Macrothink Institute, 12 (4), 24-35 http://www.macrothink.org/journal/index.php/ije/article/view/17898https://doi.org/10.5296/ije.v12i4.17898
Milad, M. (2021). Translating constructivism into pedagogy from philosophy to practice: Active project-based learning. The International Journal of Humanities Education, 19(1), 39-51. ISSN 2327-0063 https://cgscholar.com/bookstore/works/translating-constructivism-into-pedagogy-from-philosophy-to-practice?category_id=cgrn&path=cgrn%2F228%2F232
Rashid, S. (2017). Computer Assisted Language Learning in Pakistan: Teachers’ Perspectives. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(4), 802-808. e-ISSN 2466-1511/ ISSN 1738-3102 http://journal.asiatefl.org/
Sahakian, S. & Ghoneim, O. (2007). “Constructoactive learning and quality assurance in applied arts: Developing performance in faculties of specific education.” Eighth Scientific Conference, 61-62.
Thomas, W. R & Macgregor, S. (2005). “Online project-based learning: How collaborative strategies and problem solving processes impact performance.” Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 16 (1), 83–107. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/5059/
Ware, P., & O'Dowd, R. (2008). Peer feedback on language form in telecollaboration. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 43-63. https://scholarspace.manoa.hawaii.edu/bitstream/10125/44130/1/12_01_wareodowd.pdf
Warschauer M. & Healey D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching 31, 57-71. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/language-teaching/article/abs/computers-and-language-learning-an-overview/0CF20A4837B377B3A214BF410F4775EB
Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia language teaching (pp. 3-20). Logos International. http://www.ict4lt.org/en/warschauer.htm
Warschauer, M., & Meskill, C. (2000). Technology and Second Language Teaching and Learning. In J. Rosenthal (Ed), Handbook of Undergraduate Second Language Education. Lawrence Erlbaum.
