Evaluating Lexical Complexity From EGP to ESP Textbooks
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.09Keywords:
ESP, EGP, lexical complexity, exical sophistication, textbooksAbstract
ESP classes are usually designed for college students after they finish EGP learning. Accordingly, ESP textbooks are used after they use the EGP ones. Logically, ESP textbooks should be lexically more sophisticated than EGP ones, because linguistic contents are also important concerns for ESP teaching, and ESP classes should also promote students’ language development in addition to their professional advancement. This research aims to compare lexical complexity between EGP and ESP textbooks used among college students. With lexical sophistication as an index for lexical complexity, this study found some ESP textbooks were lexically easier than the EGP ones in this study, which contrasts with input hypothesis. This implicates that ESP textbook writers should consider the contents of EGP textbooks when writing textbooks.
References
Ahmad, M., & Shah, S. K. (2019). A critical discourse analysis of gender representations in the content of 5th grade English language textbook. International and Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Sciences, 8(1), 1-24.
Alfter, D., & Volodina, E. (2018). Towards single word lexical complexity prediction. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the thirteenth workshop on innovative use of NLP for building educational applications.
Ansary, H., & Babaii, E. (2002). Universal characteristics of EFL/ESL textbooks: A step towards systematic textbook evaluation. The Internet TESL Journal, 8(2), 1-9.
Anthony, L. (2014). AntWordProfiler (Version 1.4.1). Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved September 22, 2021, from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software
Arya, D. J., Hiebert, E. H., & Pearson, P. D. (2017). The effects of syntactic and lexical complexity on the comprehension of elementary science texts. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 107-125.
Brunfaut, T., & Révész, A. (2015). The role of task and listener characteristics in second language listening. Tesol Quarterly, 49(1), 141-168.
Bulté, B., & Housen, A. (2012). Defining and operationalising L2 complexity. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 21-46). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Cai, J. (2013). The implication of the shift from EGP to ESP in National Cheng Kung University，Taiwan. Foreign Language Learning Theory and Practice, 3, 7-11, 94.
Chao, L. (2013). The influence of Krashen’s input hypothesis on teaching college English listening in China. Studies in Literature and Language, 6(3), 49-52.
Chen, A. C.-H. (2016). A critical evaluation of text difficulty development in ELT textbook series: A corpus-based approach using variability neighbor clustering. System, 58, 64-81. doi:10.1016/j.system.2016.03.011
Chen, X. (2017). Top ten majors with the largest number of students. Retrieved October 13, 2021, from https://gaokao.chsi.com.cn/gkzt/rszdbkzy2017
Cheng, X. (2011). Empirical study on language features and the selection of bilingual instruction models. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching(2), 62-65. doi:10.13458/j.cnki.flatt.000359
Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. Tesol Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.
Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. United Kingdom: Macmillan.
Davies, P. (2008). ELT in Mexican higher education should be mainly ESP, not EGP. Mextesol Journal, 32(1), 80-89.
Day, J., & Krzanowski, M. (2011). Teaching English for specific purposes: An introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Dominguez, L. M. (2003). Gender textbook evaluation. TESL Canada Journal, 8(1), 32-46.
Eguchi, M., & Kyle, K. (2020). Continuing to explore the multidimensional nature of lexical sophistication: The case of oral proficiency interviews. The Modern Language Journal, 104(2), 381-400. doi:10.1111/modl.12637
Esmaeilpour, E., & Shahrokhi, M. (2015). Replacing EGP by ESP at Iranian universities: Student and faculty perceptions. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(7), 45-59.
Flowerdew, J. (2012). Discourse in English language education. UK: Routledge.
Francis, A. L., & Nusbaum, H. C. (1999). The effect of lexical complexity on intelligibility. International Journal of Speech Technology, 3(1), 15-25. doi:10.1023/A:1009622725718
Guest, M. (2016). Overcoming institutional barriers to establishing an ESP programme: A case report in Japan. Asian ESP Journal, 12(3), 7-23.
Guo, Y., & Xu, J. (2013). A survey on the use and evaluations of college English teaching materials among non-English major college students. Foreign Language Research, 175(6), 102-108. doi:10.16263/j.cnki.23-1071/h.2013.06.025
Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Retrieved Novermber 12, 2021, from https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.463.8762&rep=rep1&type=pdf.
Krashen, S. (1992). The input hypothesis: An update. In James E. Alatis (Ed). Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art (pp. 409-431). Washington: Georgetown university press.
Lahmann, C., Steinkrauss, R., & Schmid, M. S. (2016). Factors affecting grammatical and lexical complexity of long‐term L2 speakers’ oral proficiency. Language learning, 66(2), 354-385.
Li, W. (2012). Integration of ESP into EGP: The multidimensional and hybrid English training model in Liaoning Police Academy. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(9), 1877-1884.
Litz, D. R. (2005). Textbook evaluation and ELT management: A South Korean case study. Asian EFL journal, 48(1), 1-53.
Lu, X. (2012). The relationship of lexical richness to the quality of ESL learners’ oral narratives. The Modern Language Journal, 96(2), 190-208.
Mahmood, K. (2010). Textbook evaluation in Pakistan: Issue of conformity to the national curriculum guidelines. Bulletin of Education and Research, 32(1), 15-36.
McCarthy, P. M., & Jarvis, S. (2010). MTLD, vocd-D, and HD-D: A validation study of sophisticated approaches to lexical diversity assessment. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 381-392. doi:10.3758/BRM.42.2.381
Mukundan, J., & Ahour, T. (2010). A review of textbook evaluation checklists across four decades (1970–2008). In B. Tomlinson & H. Masuhara (Eds.), Research for Materials Development in Language Learning: Evidence for best parctice (pp. 336-352). London: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Mukundan, J., Hajimohammadi, R., & Nimehchisalem, V. (2011). Developing an English language textbook evaluation checklist. Contemporary Issues in Education Research (CIER), 4(6), 21-28.
Paetzold, G., & Specia, L. (2016). Semeval 2016 task 11: Complex word identification. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2016).
Rahimpour, M., & Hashemi, R. (2011). Textbook selection and evaluation in EFL context. World Journal of Education, 1(2), 62-68.
Read, J. (2000). Assessing vocabulary. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge university press.
Révész, A., & Brunfaut, T. (2013). Text characteristics of task input and difficulty in second language listening comprehension. Studies in second language acquisition, 35(1), 31-65. doi:10.1017/S0272263112000678
Rodgers, T. S. (1969). On measuring vocabulary difficulty. An analysis of Item Variables in learning Russian-English vocabulary pairs. IRAL: International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 7(4), 327-343.
Sheldon, L. E. (1988). Evaluating ELT textbooks and materials. ELT journal, 42(4), 237-246. doi:10.1093/elt/42.4.237
Szlachta, Z., Bozic, M., Jelowicka, A., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2012). Neurocognitive dimensions of lexical complexity in Polish. Brain and Language, 121(3), 219-225. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2012.02.007
Tang, X., & Zheng, D. (2018). A retrospective evaluation of college ELT textbooks in China. Paper presented at the 2018 International Conference on Social Science and Education Reform (ICSSER 2018).
Thomson, C. K., & Otsuji, E. (2003). Evaluation of business Japanese textbooks: Issues of gender. Japanese Studies, 23(2), 185-203.
Williams, D. (1983). Developing criteria for textbook evaluation. ELT journal, 37(3), 251-255.
Wu, W. (2010). The application of input hypothesis to the teaching of listening and speaking of college English. Asian Social Science, 6(9), 137-141.
Wu, X. (2018). A study on linguistic complexity of international journal publications by Chinese scholars. Wuhan, China: Wuhan University Press.
Yan, L., & Gao, X. (2014). Word saliency and frequency of academic words in textbooks: A case study in the "New Standard College English". International Education Studies, 7(4), 14-26.
Ying, S. (2019). A study on the application of input hypothesis in English teaching of junior high school. Linguistics, 7(6), 364-367.
Zareva, A. (2019). Lexical complexity of academic presentations: Similarities despite situational differences. Journal of Second Language Studies, 2(1), 71-92.
Zhou, Q. (2012). A corpus-based study on the vocabulary in China's Contemporary College English. (PhD dissertation). Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Zohrabi, M. (2015). Trends in ESP and EGP. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(3). doi:10.17507/jltr.0603.27
