Online and Offline Assessment Methods in Higher Education: A Revisitation of EFL Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices

Authors

  • Ali Abbas Falah Alzubi Najran University
  • Khaled Nasser Ali Al-Mwzaiji Najran University
  • Mohd Nazim College of Languages and Translation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.02

Keywords:

EFL, teachers' perceptions, assessment, online/offline learning, higher education

Abstract

Assessment is a key component of the educational spectrum and engages teachers in evaluating students’ performance through various methods. During the Covid-19 pandemic, teachers employed various assessment methods through the online mode of teaching and learning; now, at the beginning of the end of the pandemic, teachers are back to practicing offline assessment methods. This study identifies English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers’ perceptions of online versus offline assessment methods in higher education. Furthermore, it targets the best skill-wise assessment methods and constraints that teachers can use when applying EFL assessment methods in both online and offline learning modes. To achieve the study objectives, a descriptive-diagnostic approach was applied; the data were collected from 61 EFL teachers through a questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The findings show that EFL teachers perceive assessment methods in the online mode of learning as being of a medium level of utility, whereas they perceive assessments in the offline mode of learning as being highly useful. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were found between the EFL teachers’ perceptions of the utility of assessment methods in offline and online modes of learning: the teachers perceived assessments as being significantly more useful in the offline mode of learning. It was also found that the greatest constraints of EFL assessment methods in an online learning mode are issues of cheating and impersonation, insufficient exposure to information technology, and lack of awareness of assistive evaluation tools. In the offline learning mode, the greatest constraints of EFL assessment methods are a lack of awareness of assessment methods and classroom management. In light of these new findings, a set of recommendations is suggested for further research.

Author Biographies

Ali Abbas Falah Alzubi, Najran University

English Department, College of Languages and Translation

Khaled Nasser Ali Al-Mwzaiji, Najran University

English Department, PY

Mohd Nazim, College of Languages and Translation

English Department

References

Abduh, M. Y. M., (2021). EFL Teachers’ Online Assessment Practices During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Changes and Mediating Factors. Asian EFL Journal, 28(1.1), 26–46.

Al-Samiri, R. A. (2021). English language teaching in Saudi Arabia in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: challenges and positive outcomes. Arab World English Journal, (S1), 147-159. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid.11.

Baijnath, N., & Singh, D. (2019). Examination cheating: risks to the quality and integrity of higher education. S Afr J Sci 115(11/12), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2019/6281

Bailey, S., Hendricks, S., &Applewhite, S. (2015) Student perspectives of assessment strategies in online courses. J Interact Online Learn, 13(3), 112–125. Retrieved July 5, 2022 from https://www.ncolr.org/issues/jiol/v13/n3/student-perspectives-of-assessment-strategies.html

Brookhart, S. M., & Durkin, D. T. (2003). Classroom assessment, student motivation, and achievement in high school social studies classes. Applied Measurement in Education, 16, 27-54.

Cheng, L., & Wang, X. (2007). Grading, feedback, and reporting in ESL/EFL classrooms. Language Assessment Quarterly, 4, 85-107.

Cheng, L., Rogers, T., & Hu, H. (2004). ESL/EFL instructors’ classroom assessment practices: Purposes, methods, and procedures. Language Testing, 21, 360-389.

Cumming, A. (2001). ESL/EFL instructors’ practices for writing assessment: Specific purposes or general purposes? Language Testing, 18, 207-224.

Frodden, M., Restrepo, M., & Maturana, L. (2004). Analysis of assessment instruments used in foreign language teaching. Íkala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 9(15), 171-201.

Aristizabal, F. G. (2018). A Diagnostic study on teachers’ beliefs and practices in foreign language assessment. Íkala: Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 23(1), 25-44. doi:10.17533/udea.ikala.v23n01a04

Inbar-Lourie, O. (2017). Language assessment literacy. In E. Shohamy, L. Or & S. May (Eds.), Language Testing and Assessment (pp. 257-270). Springer International Publishing AG. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02261-1_19

Jannati, S. (2015). ELT teachers’ language assessment literacy: Perceptions and practices. The International Journal of Research in Teacher Education, 6(2), 26–37.

Lopez, A., & Bernal, R. (2009). Language testing in Colombia: A call for more teacher education and teacher training in language assessment. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(2), 55-70.

MacLeod P.D., & Eaton, S.E. (2020). The paradox of faculty attitudes toward student violations of academic integrity. J Acad Ethics 18(4), 347–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4

Mertler, C. A. (1998). Classroom assessment practices of Ohio teachers. Paper presented at the meeting of the Mid-Western Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.

Muñoz, A. P., Palacio, M., & Escobar, L. (2012). Teachers' beliefs about assessment in an EFL context in Colombia. Profile: Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 14(1), 143-158.

Nartey, M. (2013). A speech act analysis of status updates on Facebook: The case of Ghanaian university students. Language in India, 13(12), 114–141.

Ölmezer-Öztürk, E., & Aydin, B. (2019). Voices of EFL teachers as assessors: Their opinions and needs regarding language assessment. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi - Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 7(1), 373–390. https://doi.org/10.14689/issn.2148-2624.1.7c1s.17m.

Oz, S., & Atay, D. (2017). Turkish EFL instructors’ in-class language assessment literacy: Perceptions and practices. ELT Research Journal, 6(1), 25-44.

Remmi, F., & Hashim, H. (2021). Primary School Teachers’ Usage and Perception of Online Formative Assessment Tools in Language Assessment. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 10(1), 290–303. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v10-i1/8846

Sahinkarakas, S. (2012). The role of teaching experience on teachers’ perceptions of language assessment. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1787-1792.

Shim, K. N. (2009). An investigation into teachers' perceptions of classroom-based assessment of English as a foreign language in Korean primary education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Exeter, Exeter.

Sikka, A., Nath, J. L., & Cohen, M. D. (2007). Practicing teachers’ beliefs and uses of assessment. International Journal of Case Method Research & Application, 3, 240-253.

Yilmaz, F. G. K., Ustun, A. B., & Yilmaz, R. (2020). Investigation of Pre-service Teachers’ Opinions on Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Formative Assessment: An Example of Online Multiple-Choice Exam. Journal of Teacher Education & Lifelong Learning, 2(1), 10–19. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/tell/issue/52517/718396

Yoestara, M., Putri, Z., Keumala, M., & Idami, Z. (2020). Pre-Service English Teachers’ Perception towards Online Assessment Method. International Journal of Education, Language and Religion, 2(1), 1–10.

Zhang, Z., & Burry-Stock, J. A. (2003). Classroom assessment practices and teachers' self-perceived assessment skills. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4), 323-342.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles