The Introductory Sentence in Literature Research Articles Published in High-Impact vs. Predatory Journals
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1305.22Keywords:
academic writing, cross-cultural communication, contrastive rhetoric, EnglishAbstract
The current study discusses the stylistic properties of the introductory sentence with which scholars begin their introduction in the literature field. The study draws upon a dataset of 624 introductory sentences, half of which are collected from high-impact Web of Science indexed journals and the other half are drawn from presumably predatory journals. The study shows that the introductory sentence written by authors of high-impact journals is a work-based sentence with a high number of references whereas that composed by authors of presumably predatory journals is a reference-less author-based sentence. Although Swales (1990, 2004) argues that less experienced writers may begin their introductions with Move 2/3-type sentences, the study shows that there is no difference between the two sets of scholars in terms of the usage of Move 2/3. However, authors of high-impact journals tend to describe their study, state their purpose, indicate research gaps and raise questions in their Move-2/3 sentences whereas authors of presumably predatory journals prefer definitional clarifications the most. The study also reveals that the introductory sentence produced by authors of presumably predatory journals is shorter in word count, full of repetitions and grammatical/punctuation errors and sometimes presented as a full paragraph.
References
Ahmad, U. (1997). Research article introductions in Malay: Rhetoric in an emerging research community. In A. Duszak (Ed.), Culture and styles of academic discourse, (pp. 273-303). Mouton de Gruyter.
Anthony, L. (1999). Writing research article introductions in software engineering: How accurate is the standard model? IEEE Transactions of Professional Communication, 42(1), 38–46.
Brett, P. (1994). A genre analysis of the Results section of sociology articles. English for Specific Purposes, 13(1), 47–60.
Chu, B. (1996). Introductions in state-of-the-art, argumentative, and teaching tips TESL journal articles: Three possible sub-genres of introduction? City University of Hong Kong.
Fredrickson, K., & Swales, J. (1994). Competition and discourse community: Introductions from Nysvenka Studier. In B. Gunnarsson, P. Linell, & B. Nordberg (Eds.), Text and talk in professional contexts (pp. 9-22). ASLA.
Gross, A., Harmon, J., & Reidy, M. (2002). Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford University Press.
Jogthong, C. (2001). Research article introductions in Thai: Genre analysis of academic writing [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. West Virginia University.
Lewin, B., Fine, J., & Young, L. (2005). Expository discourse: A genre-based approach to social science research texts. Continuum.
Lim, J. (2010). Commenting on research results in applied linguistics and education: A comparative genre-based investigation. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(4): 280–294.
Najjar, H. (1990). Arabic as a research language: The case of the agricultural sciences [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan.
Samraj, B. (2002). Introductions in research articles: Variations across disciplines. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1): 1–18.
Stamatović, M., & Vesna, B. (2015). The rhetorical structure of conclusions in linguistic academic articles published in national and international journals [Unpublished manuscript]. Retrieved November 16, 2021, from: https://bit.ly/3nko0jm.
Swales, J. (1981). Aspects of article introductions. Aston University Press.
Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
Swales, J. (2004). Research genres: Exploration and application. Cambridge University Press.
Taylor, G., & Chen, T. (1991). Linguistic, cultural, and subcultural issues in contrastive discourse analysis: Anglo-American and Chinese scientific texts. Applied Linguistics, 12(3), 319–336.
Zorzo, D., Ciglič, B., & Alonso, G. (2017). Intercultural rhetoric and academic writing: contrastive analysis of research articles’ introductions written in Spanish by Slovene researchers. Journal for Foreign Languages, 9(1), 83–106.
