A Multimodal Ecological Discourse Analysis of Presentation PowerPoint Slides in Business English Class

Authors

  • Wenjin Qi Yuncheng University
  • Yutao Hu Yuncheng University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1306.23

Keywords:

multimodal ecological discourse analysis, visual grammar, ecosophy, business English

Abstract

This study applies the visual grammar theory to the multimodal ecological discourse analysis of the students’ presentation PPT slides in business English class. It investigates the process of meaning construction through a quantitative analysis of 160 images and a thorough qualitative analysis of 2 specific images. The results reveal that students’ ecological values embedded in PPT design are delivered via intersemiotic play of multimodal semiotic resources. And it is found that students’ ecological values are in accordance with the ecosophy of “Diversity and Harmony, Interaction and Co-existence”, which highlights the harmonious coexistence between man, society and nature.

References

Baldry, A. & P. J. (2006). Multimodal transcription and text analysis. London: Equinox.

Barthes, R. (1977). Image-music-test. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cheng, C. S. (2008). Multimodal discourse analysis of movie posters. Movie Literature Studies 15.2, 34-39.

Fowler, R., Hodge, B., Kress, G. & T. Trew. (1979). Language and control. London: Cambridge University Press.

Gu, Y. G. (2007). Multimedia, multimodal learning. Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education 23.2, 3-12.

Halliday, M. A. (1994). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. Baltimore: University Park Press.

He, W. & Liu, J. H. (2020). Ecosophy construction and development. Shandong Foreign Language Education 41.1, 12-24.

He, W. & Wei, R. (2018). Ecosophy in international ecological discourse. Foreign Language Research 24.6, 28-35.

Hu, Z. L. (2007). Multimodality in social semiotic studies. Language Teaching and Research 26.1, 1-10.

Huang, G. W. (2018). From ecological critical discourse analysis to harmonious discourse analysis. Foreign Languages in China 22.4, 39-46.

Kress, G. & T. van Leeuwen. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.

Lemke, J. Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J.R. Martin & R. Veel (eds.), Reading science: Critical and functional perspectives on discourses of science. London/New York: Routledge.

Li, M. Q. (2007). Multimodal discourse analysis of movie posters. Movie Literature 12. 15, 98-100.

Li, Z. Z. (2003). Social semiotic analysis of multimodal discourse. Foreign Language Studies 81.5, 1-8.

Martin, J. R. (2006). Positive discourse analysis: Solidarity and change. The Journal of English Studies 25.1, 65–81.

Miao, X. W. & Lei, L. (2019). Ecological discourse analysis in SFL. Shandong Foreign Language Education 22. 5, 28-33.

O’ Halloran. (2019). Interdependence, interaction and metaphor in multi-semiotic texts. Social Semiotics 44.3, 261–275.

Scollon, R. (1999). Mediated discourse as social interaction. London: Longman.

Wei, Q. H. (2009). Multimodality and multimodal discourse analysis. Beijing: Science Press.

Zhang, D. L. (2009). Multimodal theory applied to multimedia foreign language education. Foreign Language Studies 30.4, 15-20.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-01

Issue

Section

Articles