Power Relations in Institutional Discourse: A Conversation Analytic Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1502.32Keywords:
institutional discourse, media interview, conversation analysis, powerAbstract
Language is one of the dominant channels through which power can be exercised and struggled over during social interaction. In institutional discourse, power can interactionally be achieved and negotiated through the use of a variety of discursive resources at the disposal of discourse participants. This study employs a conversation analytic approach (CA) to data collection and analysis. The main objective of the study is to find out how power and control are exercised throughout the course of news interviews. Data analysis of a substantial extract from a BBC news interview with former Secretary-General of the United Nations, Kofi Annan, revealed four discursive features of particular significance in terms of the management of power and control: questioning, interruption, topic-controlling, and formulation. These discursive control devices enable the interviewer to exercise power and control over the interviewee. The use of each of these discursive features is examined and the implications of the analysis for language teaching and learning are discussed.
References
Abdulkadir, A. U. (2023). A critical discourse analysis of selected political interviews in Nigerian news media. Journal of Languages, Linguistics and Literary Studies, 3(2), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.57040/jllls.v3i2.432
Albert, S. (2017). Research methods: Conversation analysis. In M. Schober, D. N. Rapp A. M. Britt (Eds.), Handbook of Discourse Processes (2nd ed., pp. 99-108). London: Taylor and Francis.
Antaki, C. (2011). Six kinds of applied conversation analysis. In C. Antaki (Ed.), Applied conversation analysis (pp. 1–14). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Antaki, C., Barnes, R., & Leudar, I. (2005). Diagnostic formulations in psychotherapy. Discourse Studies, 7(6), 627–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605055420
Bannink, A., & Albaladejo, J. (2018). The accountability interview revisited: De-constructing anti-abortion discourse in Spain. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2018.1558491
BBC. The interview archive. Retrieved March 20, 2023, from https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p002vsnh/episodes/player.
Cerny, M. (2010). Interruptions and overlaps in doctor-patient communication revisited. Linguistica (accessed on 18 August 2023). http://www.phil.muni.cz/linguistica/art/cerny/cer-002.pdf
Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2021). Conversation analysis and the study of sociohistorical change. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 54(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2021.1899717
Clayman, S., & Heritage, J. (2002). The News Interview: Journalists and Public Figures on the Air. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ekström, M., Kroon, A., & Nylund, M. (2006). News from the Interview Society. Göteborg: Nordicom.
Ekström, M., & Kroon, A. (2011). Beyond the broadcast interview. Journalism Studies, 12(2), 172-187. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2010.493328
Ekström, M., & Stevanovic, M. (2023). Conversation analysis and power: Examining the descendants and antecedents of social action. Frontiers in Sociology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2023.1196672
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. London. Longman.
Greatbatch, D. (1986). Aspects of topical organization in news interviews: The use of agenda-shifting procedures by interviewees. Media, Culture & Society, 8(4), 441–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443786008004005
Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In P. Cole, & J. L. Morgan. (Eds.), Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 3, Speech Acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
Hak, T., & de Boer, F. (1996). Formulations in first encounters. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(94)00076-7
Heritage, J. (1985). Analyzing news interviews: Aspects of the production of talk for an overhearing audience. In T. A. Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of discourse analysis (Vol. 3, pp. 95-119). New York: Academic.
Heritage, J. (2002). The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile questions content. Journal of Pragmatics, 34, 1427-1446. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00072-3
Heritage, J., & Watson, R. (1979). Formulations as Conversational Objects. In G. Psathas (Ed.), Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology (pp. 123-162). New York: Irvington Press.
Huls, E., & Varwijk, J. (2011). Political bias in TV interviews. Discourse & Society, 22(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926510382836
Hutchby, I. (2013). Confrontation talk: Arguments, asymmetries, and power on talk radio. New York: Routledge.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (2008). Conversation analysis (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press
Jagtiani, N. (2012). Political news interviews: From a conversation analytic and critical discourse analytic perspective. Colorado Research in Linguistics, 23. https://doi.org/10.25810/yeqf-qc86
Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2014). Conversation analysis in applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 34, 171–212. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190514000014
Kress, G., & Fowler, R. (1979). Interviews. In R. Fowler, B. Hodge, G. Kress, & T. Trew (Eds), Language and Control (pp. 63-80). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.
Locher, M. (2004). Power and politeness in action: Disagreements in oral communication. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Montgomery, M. (2008). The discourse of the broadcast news interviews. Journalism Studies, 9(2), 260-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700701848303
Ng, S., & Bradac, J. (1993). Power in language: Verbal communication and social influence. London: Sage.
Ong, B., Barnes, S., & Buus, N. (2021). Downgrading deontic authority in open dialogue reflection proposals: a conversation analysis. Fam. Process, 60, 1217–1232. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.12586
Paltridge, B. (2000). Making sense of discourse analysis. NSW: Gerd Stabler.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. New York: Longman.
Roca-Cuberes, C. (2014). Political interviews in public television and commercial broadcasters: A comparison. Discourse & Communication, 8(2), 155–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313507154
Sidnell, J. (2009). Conversation Analysis: Comparative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stephenson, M. (2020). Setting the group agenda: negotiating deontic rights through directives in a task-based, oral, L2, group assessment. Classroom Disc, 11, 337–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/19463014.2019.1651750
Taboada, M. (2006). Spontaneous and non-spontaneous turn-taking. Pragmatics, 16(2-3), 329-360. https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.16.2-3.04tab
Talmy, S. (2009). Resisting ESL: Categories and sequence in a critically “motivated” analysis of classroom interaction. In H. t. Nguyen & G. Kasper (Eds.), Talk-in interaction: Multilingual perspectives (pp. 181–213). Honolulu: University of Hawai’i, National Foreign Language Resource Center.
Thornborrow, J. (2002). Power talk: Language and interaction in institutional discourse. Harlow: Longman.
Vásquez, C. (2010). Exploring two explicit formulations in university discourse. Text & Talk, 30(6), 749-771. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2010.036
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Wenjie, H. (2019). A Critical discourse analysis to power Relations in Chinese TV news interviews: A case study. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 5(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2019.5.2.213
