An Investigation Into English Learners’ Speech Acts Using a Semi-Automatic Annotation Tool
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1504.03Keywords:
speech acts, semi-automatic annotation tool, DART, interlanguage pragmatics, learner corpus researchAbstract
This paper explores the speech acts most frequently performed by learners of English as a foreign language (EFL) through the Dialogue Annotation and Research Tool (DART), a semi-automatic annotation tool. The study used learner corpus research and an English as the first language (L1) speaker corpus as a reference to compare the speech acts performed by the EFL learners. The study involved 90 EFL learners of four nationalities. A spoken learner corpus was built with the dyadic interlanguage English conversation register. The most frequently performed speech acts were generally different for the English L1 speakers and the EFL learners. The speech acts labeled as correctSelf, referProcess, expressNonAwareness, and stateReason were in the top 10 for EFL learners, whereas they were not in the top 10 for the English L1 speakers. This difference was caused by three factors: the English proficiency of the EFL learners, the frequently used formulaic phrases, and the task requirements. Moreover, the corpus annotation has a problem with unrecognized speech acts, primarily due to the redundancies and fragments in the learner discourses. The findings of this study reveal the complementary relationship between grammatical and pragmatic performances.
References
Akmal, H., Syahriyani, A., & Handayani, T. (2022). Request speech act of Indonesian English learners and Australian English speakers through cross-cultural pragmatic perspectives. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 498-520.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Budeng, R. B., & Merza, H. N. M. (2023). Assessing interlanguage pragmatic competence on speech acts in a Filipino EFL context. Corpus Pragmatics, 7(2), 85-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41701-023-00137-y
Council of Europe. (2020). Common European Framework of Reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment-companion volume. Retrieved May 10, 2023, from Council of Europe Publishing. www.coe.int/lang-cefr
Fernández, J. (2022). Corpus linguistics in L2 pragmatics research. Applied Pragmatics, 4(2), 178-198. https://doi.org/10.1075/ap.00008.fer
Fernández, J. (2023). Pragmatics in learner corpora. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics, (pp. 1-6). Wiley.
Fernández, J., & Staples, S. (2021). Pragmatic approach. In N. Tracy-Ventura, & M. Paquot (Eds.), Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and corpora (pp. 240-251). Routledge.
Granger, S. (2015). Contrastive interlanguage analysis: A reappraisal. International Journal of Learner Corpus Research, 1(1), 7-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/ijlcr.1.1.01gra
Harris, D. W. (2019). Intention and commitment in speech acts. Theoretical Linguistics, 45(1-2), 53-67. https://doi.org/10.1515/tl-2019-0004
Hosoda, Y., & Aline, D. (2021). Deployment of I don’t know and wakannai in second language classroom peer discussions. Text & Talk, 42(1), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2019-0275
House, J., & Kádár, D. Z. (2023). An interactional approach to speech acts for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics Review [Online first], 1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2022-0116
Huang, L. (2021). Toward multimodal corpus pragmatics: Rationale, case, and agenda. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities, 36(1), 101-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqz080
Khamkhien, A. (2022). Speech acts or speech act sets of refusals: Some evidence from Thai L2 learners. Novitas-Royal, 16(1), 97-121.
Mao, T. (2021). Investigation of L2/Ln pragmatic competence: Its core and route map. Frontier in Psychology, 12, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.690550
Mao, T., & He, S. (2021). An integrated approach to pragmatic competence: Its framework and properties. SAGE Open, 11(2), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/21582440211011472
McEnery, T., Brezina, V., Gablasova, D., & Banejee, J. (2019). Corpus linguistics, learner corpora, and SLA: Employing technology to analyze language use. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 74-92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000096
Pan, Z. (2023a). Examination of data collection methods for pragmatic competence assessment of EFL learners. International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies, 12(2), 159-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.55493/5019.v12i2.4798
Pan, Z. (2023b). Formulaic language use by learners of English in interlanguage communication. World Journal of English Language, 13(7), 128-139. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n7p128
Searle, J. (1979). Expression and meaning studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Staples, S., & Fernández, J. (2019). Corpus linguistics approaches to L2 pragmatics research. In N. Taguchi (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition and pragmatics (pp. 241-254). Routledge.
Taguchi, N. (2022). Second language pragmatics: A historical overview and future directions. In W. Ren (Ed.), Second language pragmatics (pp. 7-25). Cambridge University Press.
Tübben, I. T., & Landert, D. (2022). Uh and um as pragmatic markers in dialogues: A contrastive perspective on the functions of planners in fiction and conversation. Contrastive Pragmatics, 4(2), 350-381. https://doi.org/10.1163/26660393-bja10049
Verdonik, D. (2022). Annotating dialogue acts in speech data: Problematic issues and basic dialogue act categories. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 28(2), 144-171. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.20165.ver
Weisser, M. (2018). How to do corpus pragmatics on pragmatically annotated data: Speech acts and beyond. John Benjamins.
Weisser, M. (2019a). Manual for the Dialogue Annotation & Research Tool (DART). Retrieved March 1, 2023, from http://martinweisser.org/publications/DART_manual_v3.0.pdf
Weisser, M. (2019b). The DART annotation scheme: form, appliability & application. Studia Neophilologica, 91(2), 131-153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393274.2019.1616218
Weisser, M. (2020). Speech acts in corpus pragmatics: Making the case for an extended taxonomy. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 25(4), 400-425. https://doi.org/10.1075/ijcl.19023.wei
Weisser, M. (2021). Profiling learners through pragmatically and error annotated corpora. In P. Pérez-Paredes, & G. Mark (Eds.), Beyond the concordance: corpora in language education (pp. 121-148). John Benjamins.
Yoon, S. (2020). The learner corpora of spoken English: What has been done and what should be done. Language Research, 56(1), 29-51. https://doi.org/10.30961/lr.2020.56.1.29
Yuan, W., & Lyu, S. (2022). Speech act matters: Commitment to what’s said or what’s implicated differs in the case of assertion and promise. Journal of Pragmatics, 191, 128-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2022.01.012
