Factors Influencing Preservice EFL Teachers’ Technology Integration Into Language Teaching

Authors

  • Tang Junhong Universiti Malaya
  • Jia Wei Lim Universiti Malaya
  • Meng Yew Tee Universiti Malaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1504.24

Keywords:

technology integration, language teaching methods and approaches, guidance, preservice EFL teachers

Abstract

In the 21st century, preservice EFL teachers must be able to integrate technology into language education. However, very little research has been carried out on the specific factors that influence preservice teachers to integrate appropriate technology into their language teaching. This study aimed to explore exactly what influences preservice EFL teachers to choose the appropriate technology to incorporate into their lessons through a two-cycle design-based research study. The findings suggest that preservice EFL instructors' comprehension of language teaching methods and approaches has the greatest influence on technological integration in their classrooms. In addition, the instructor’s direct guidance also facilitates their appropriate technology integration into language teaching. As a result, teacher education programs are designed to provide preservice EFL instructors with language teaching methods and approaches before assisting them in learning how to incorporate appropriate technology into specific language teaching methods or approaches. Finally, the researchers suggest that instructors also provide direct advice to preservice EFL teachers as they explore the incorporation of technology into language education.

Author Biographies

Tang Junhong, Universiti Malaya

Department of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education

Jia Wei Lim, Universiti Malaya

Department of Language and Literacy Education, Faculty of Education

Meng Yew Tee, Universiti Malaya

Department of Curriculum and Instructional Technology, Faculty of Education

References

Akayoğlu, S., Satar, H. M., Dikilitaş, K., Cirit, N. C., & Korkmazgil, S. (2020). Digital literacy practices of Turkish pre-service EFL teachers. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 85-97.

Anderson, T., & Shattuck, J. (2012). Design-based research: A decade of progress in education research? Educational Researcher, 41(1), 16-25.

Armnazi, M., & Alakrash, H. (2021). Factors affecting the application of communicative language teaching CLT in Syrian schools. TESOL and Technology Studies, 2(1), 1–14.

Baran, E., Bilici, C. S., Sari, A. A., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Investigating the impact of teacher education strategies on preservice teachers’ TPACK. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 357-370.

de Jong, T., Lazonder, A. W., Chinn, C. A., Fischer, F., Gobert, J., Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Koedinger, K. R., Krajcik, J. S., Kyza, E. A., Linn, M. C., Pedaste, M., Scheiter, K., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2023). Let’s talk evidence–The case for combining inquiry-based and direct instruction. Educational Research Review, 39, 1-14.

Farjon, D., Smits, A., & Voogt, J. (2019). Technology integration of pre-service teachers explained by attitudes and beliefs, competency, access, and experience. Computers & Education, 130, 81–93.

Gönen, S.İ. K. (2019). A qualitative study on a situated experience of technology integration: reflections from pre-service teachers and students, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 163-189.

Han, G. (2011). Constructing Pedagogical Content Knowledge in EFL Teachers. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Han, I. (2022). Contextualization of communicative language teaching in Confucian heritage culture: challenging pedagogic dichotomization. SAGE Open, 12(1), 1-14.

Harmer, J. (2016). The Practice of English Language Teaching (5th Ed.). Pearson.

Hoadley, C., & Campos, F. C. (2022). Design-based research: What it is and why it matters to studying online learning. Educational Psychologist, 57(3), 207-220.

Howatt. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford University Press

Hu., G. W. (2005). Contextual Influences on Instructional Practices: A Chinese Case for an Ecological Approach to ELT. TESOL Quarterly, 39(4), 635-660.

Janssen, N. (2017). Supporting teachers’ technology integration in lesson plans (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Twente.

Janssen, N., & Lazonder, A. W. (2016). Supporting pre-service teachers in designing technology-infused lesson plans. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 32, 456-467.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005a). Teachers learning technology by design. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 21(3), 94-102.

Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005b). What Happens When Teachers Design Education Technology? The Development of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.

Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., & Graham, C. R. (2014). The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. J.M. Spector et al. (Eds.). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 101-111). Springer.

Koehler M. J., Mishra P., & Yahya K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design. Computers & Education, 49, 740-762.

Lee, Chia-Jung, & Kim C. M. (2014). An implementation study of a TPACK-based instructional design model in a technology integration course. Education Tech Research Dev, 62, 437-460.

Li, H. (2016). Teacher-Student Negotiation of Meaning in Foreign Language Class: Interaction and Optimization. Science Press.

Li, L., & Walsh, S. (2011). Technology uptake in Chinese EFL classes. Language Teaching Research, 15(1), 99–125.

Liao, X. Q. (2004). The need for communicative language teaching in China. ELT Journal, 58(3), 270-286.

Liu, Y. M. (2020). English Language Teaching Methodology: Theory and Practice. Science Press.

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching An introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for integrating technology in teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

Mouza, C. (2016). Developing and Assessing TPACK Among Pre-Service Teachers: A Synthesis of Research. In M. C. Herring, P. Mishra, & M. J. Koehler (Ed.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge for educators (2nd ed., pp. 169–190). Routledge.

Pamuk, S. (2012). Understanding preservice teachers’ technology use through TPACK framework. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(5), 425-439.

Park, M., & Son, J. B. (2022). Pre-service EFL teachers’ readiness in computer-assisted language learning and teaching, Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 42(2), 320-334.

Ranellucci, J., Rosenberg, J., & Poitras, E. (2020). Exploring pre-service teachers’ use of technology: The technology acceptance model and expectancy-value theory. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 36(6), 810-824.

Raygan, A., & Moradkhani, S. (2020). Factors influencing technology integration in an EFL context: investigating EFL teachers’ attitudes, TPACK level, and educational climate, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(8), 1-22.

Richards J. C. & Rodgers T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (3rd Ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Shu, D. F., & Zhuang, Z. X. (2008). Modern Foreign Language Teaching: Theories, Practice and Methods (Modified Ed.). Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.

Thamarana, S. (2015). A Critical Overview of Communicative Language Teaching. International Journal of English Language, Literature and Humanities, 3(5), 90-100.

Tondeur, J., Aesaert, K., Prestridge, S., & Consuegra, E. (2018). A multilevel analysis of what matters in the training of pre-service teacher’s ICT competencies. Computers & Education, 122, 32–42.

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Baran, E. (2020). Enhancing pre-service teachers’ technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK): A mixed-method study. Educational Technology Research & Development, 68(1), 319–343.

Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Sang, G., Voogt, J., Fisser, P., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2012). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Computers & Education, 59(1), 134–144.

Valtonen, T., Sointu, E., Kukkonen, J., Mäkitalo, K., Hoang, N., Häkkinen,. P., Järvelä, S., Näykki, P., Virtanen, A., Pöntinen, S., Kostiainen, E., & Tondeur, J. (2019). Examining pre‐service teachers’ Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge as evolving knowledge domains: A longitudinal approach. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35, 491- 502.

Wang, Q. (2006). A Course in English Language Teaching. Higher Education Press.

Wang, W., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Jin, Y. (2018). Preservice Teachers’ TPACK Development: A Review of Literature. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(4), 234-258.

Wu, H. P., & Wu, H. X. (2014). Foreign Language Teaching Methods and Schools. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

Zhang, Z. D. (2003). The Attributes and Contents of English Teaching and Learning in China, Course, Textbook and Pedagogy, 5, 34-39.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles