Do They Write Differently? Exploring Gendered Linguistic Differences in Academic Writings of Saudi Writers

Authors

  • Sadia Ali Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University
  • Ebtesam Abdulhaleem King Saud University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1504.31

Keywords:

corpus, gender, linguistic variation, multidimensional analysis, Saudi academic writing

Abstract

This study examines linguistic differences between male and female academic writing in Saudi Arabia, focusing on published research papers. Using Biber's multidimensional analysis as a model, the study examines both male and female authors' inherent lexical and grammatical preferences. A dataset of 20 research papers from each gender was tagged to analyze the linguistic features. ANOVA analyses were then conducted to identify patterns and variations. The research study provides interesting perspectives on the complex relationship between language and gender in academic settings. Though there are some similarities in the use of lexico-grammatical features between male and female research papers, noticeable differences suggest that gendered perspectives have an impact on scholarly writing. Both male and female research papers fall on the same polarity of the continuum across all five dimensions but with varying degrees. The findings suggest that male research writers tend to use more informational, explicit, and non-argumentative language while using less non-narrative and abstract discourse than their female counterparts. This study emphasizes how gender impacts the linguistic choices.

Author Biographies

Sadia Ali, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University

Department of English, College of Science and Humanities

Ebtesam Abdulhaleem, King Saud University

English Language Skills Department, First Common Year

References

Abdulhaleem, E., & Ali, S. (2024). Exploring Lexico-grammatical Patterns in Doctoral Dissertations: A Multidimensional Analysis. World Journal of English Language, 14(3), 162-169. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n3p162

Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2016). How gender shapes the world. Oxford University Press.

Ali, S. (2024). A Multidimensional Analysis of Academic Writing: A Comparative Study of Saudi and British University Students’ Writing. World Journal of English Language, 14(2), 452-462. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n2p452

Ali, S., & Ali, M. (2023). Exploring Lexico-grammatical patterns in Saudi press reportage: A multidimensional analysis. Arab World English Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4432884

Alsubhi, A. S. (2016). Gender and metadiscourse in British and Saudi newspaper column writing: male/female and native/non-native differences in language use [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved February 20, 2023, from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/84073849.pdf

Alsweel, R. A. (2013). The impact of English as a second language on Saudi women's roles and identities [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved December 20, 2023, from https://mars.gmu.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/db04f384-d1fa-4d2b-bbfd-2c9da60c758a/content

Aull, L. L., & Brown, D. W. (2013). Fighting words: A corpus analysis of gender representations in sports reportage. Corpora, 8(1), 27-52. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2013.0033

Baker, P. (2012). Corpora and gender studies. Corpus Applications in Applied Linguistics, 100-116. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781472541611.ch-007

Bergvall, V. (2014). Rethinking language and gender research: Theory and practice. Routledge.

Biber, D. (1991). Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2009). Register, genre, and style. Cambridge University Press.

Biber, D., Davies, M., Jones, J. K., & Tracy-Ventura, N. (2006). Spoken and written register variation in Spanish: A multi-dimensional analysis. Corpora, 1(1), 1-37. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2006.1.1.1

Boettger, R. K., & Wulff, S. (2019). Gender effects in student technical and scientific writing—A corpus-based study. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 62(3), 239-252. https://doi.org/10.1109/tpc.2019.2920029

Bonnell, V. E., & Hunt, L. (2023). Beyond the cultural turn: New directions in the study of society and culture. University of California Press.

Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4-5), 585-614. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605054407

Coates, J. (2015). Women, men and language: A sociolinguistic account of gender differences in language. Routledge.

Dixon, L., Zhao, J., Quiroz, B. G., & Shin, J. (2012). Home and community factors influencing bilingual children’s ethnic language vocabulary development. International Journal of Bilingualism, 16(4), 541-565. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911429527

Douglas, F. G. (2016). A Transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19-47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301

Eckert, P. (2019). The limits of meaning: Social indexicality, variation, and the Cline of interiority. Language. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0239

Engström, A. (2018). I’m sure women use more hedges, I think: A study comparing male and female usage of hedges [Master's thesis]. Retrieved February 10, 2024, from https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-26186

Gray, B., & Biber, D. (2018). Academic writing as a locus of grammatical change. Studies in Corpus Linguistics, 117-146. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.85.06gra

Hartshorne, J. K., & Ullman, M. T. (2005). Why girls say ‘holded’ more than boys. Developmental Science, 9(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2005.00459.x

Holmes, J. (1990). Hedges and boosters in women's and men's speech. Language & Communication, 10(3), 185-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0271-5309(90)90002-s

Hyland, K. (2021). Teaching and researching writing. Routledge.

Hyland, K., Wang, W., & (Kevin) Jiang, F. (2022). Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 265, 103205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205

Litosseliti, L. (2014). Gender and language theory and practice. Routledge.

Maringe, F., & Carter, S. (2007). International students' motivations for studying in UK HE. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(6), 459-475. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513540710780000

Mondorf, B. (2011). Gender differences in English syntax. Walter de Gruyter.

Mulac, A., Giles, H., Bradac, J. J., & Palomares, N. A. (2013). The gender-linked language effect: An empirical test of a general process model. Language Sciences, 38, 22-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2012.12.004

Omidian, T. (2021). Multiple Perspectives On Writing For Research Publication Across Academic Fields [Doctoral dissertation]. Retrieved January 10, 2024, from https://openaccess.wgtn.ac.nz/articles/thesis/Multiple_Perspectives_On_Writing_For_Research_Publication_Across_Academic_Fields/16840480

Simon, E. (2021). The Different Language Use between Male and Female University Students. Lectio, 1(1), 13-18. Retrieved February 5, 2024, from https://journal.unwira.ac.id/index.php/LECTIO/article/download/371/313

Soh, K. (2020). Language learning and culture teaching: Culture in language. Teaching Chinese Language in Singapore, 3-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1149-3_1

Staples, S., Egbert, J., Biber, D., & Gray, B. (2016). Academic writing development at the University level. Written Communication, 33(2), 149-183. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741088316631527

Sulaimani, A., & Elyas, T. (2017). A Glocalized or globalized edition? Contextualizing gender representation in EFL textbooks in Saudi Arabia: A critical discourse analysis perspective. Conceptual Shifts and Contextualized Practices in Education for Glocal Interaction, 55-76. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6421-0_4

Tyler, J. C. (2015). Expanding and mapping the indexical Field. Journal of English Linguistics, 43(4), 284-310. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424215607061

Waterkeyn, T. (2021). Sociocultural impacts of English and globalisation on women in higher education in Saudi Arabia [EdD dissertation]. Retrieved December 5, 2023, https://oro.open.ac.uk/75499/

Downloads

Published

2024-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles