“Computer” as the Source Domain for “Brain”: A Case Study of Online Vietnamese Articles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1506.15Keywords:
conceptual metaphors, human brain, computer, mappingAbstract
Based on the theory of cognitive linguistics, this article investigates computer-related conceptual metaphors in discourses in online Vietnamese newspapers to clarify how Vietnamese people conceptualize the target domain of "brain" via the source domain of “computer”. This study aimed to answer two questions: “In online Vietnamese articles, which thinking mechanism is used to conceptualize the human brain as a computer?” and “What similarities from the target domain are activated and mapped onto the source domain?” With the correlations in experience and knowledge projected from the source domain to the target domain, the logical relationship in organizing the mapping scheme of conceptual metaphors, the article points out a type of thinking in the conceptual structure dominated by the 4.0 industrial civilization which is both universal and typical of Vietnamese people’s mind.
References
Baria, A. T., & Cross, K. (2021). The brain is a computer is a brain: neuroscience's internal debate and the social significance of the Computational Metaphor. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.14042
Dennett, D. C. (1993). Consciousness Explained. Penguin Books.
Gleyse, J. (2013). The machine body metaphor: From science and technology to physical education and sport, in France (1825-1935). Scandinavian Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports, Wiley, 23(6), 758-765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0838.2012.01447.x
Group, Pragglejaz. (2007). MIP: A method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse. Metaphor and Symbol, 22(1), 1-39.
Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind. The University of Chicago Press.
Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1988). The computer and the mind. Harvard University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2002). Metaphor: A practical introduction (2nd). Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.
Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: A practical introduction. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
Nguyen, T. B. H., Le, V. L. H, Nguyen, K. C, Chan, H. S. & Ngo, T. T. (2023). The Mapping Mechanism from the Source Domain “Electronic Devices” onto the Target Domain “Human Being”: An Online Vietnamese Article Context. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(10), 2577-2588. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1310.16
Patrzyk, P.M, Link, D. & Marewski, J.N. (2017). Human-like machines: Transparency and comprehensibility. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40: e276. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000255
Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works. W. W. Norton.
Radovan, M. (1995). On the Computational Model of the Mind, Informatica, 19, 635-645.
Searle, J. (1984). Minds, Brains and Science. Harvard University Press.
Searle, J. (1992). The Rediscovery of the Mind. The MIT Press.
Taylor, C., & Dewsbury, B. M. (2018). On the Problem and Promise of Metaphor Use in Science and Science Communication. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i1.1538
