The Relationship Between Students' L2 Engagement and Learning Success

Authors

  • Ibrahim H. Alzahrani Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1601.27

Keywords:

EFL learners, L2 engagement scales, L2 learning engagement, learning success

Abstract

Engagement is a crucial part of language learning as it shows how much a learner is involved in the learning process. Language learning with engagement is considered meaningful. This study measured Saudi male college EFL students' L2 engagement levels while learning English as a foreign language in their preparatory year. The relationship between students' scores in the English course and their L2 engagement was also discovered. An L2 engagement scale with three engagement domains (behavioral, emotional, and cognitive) created by Hiver et al. (2020) was utilized to measure students' L2 engagement levels. Pearson correlation was administered to explore the relationship between students' learning success (scores) and L2 engagement. The results indicated high behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement levels. In addition, the results showed a statistically significant positive relationship between students' scores and their L2 engagement. Implications for educational establishments and language teachers were presented, as well as the impact on future research and limitations.

Author Biography

Ibrahim H. Alzahrani, Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu

Jubail English Language and Preparatory Year Institute

References

Al-Hoorie, A. H., Hiver, P. (2022). Complexity theory: From metaphors to methodological advances. In A. H. Al-Hoorie & F. Szabó (Eds.), Researching language learning motivation: A concise guide (pp. 175-184). Bloomsbury.

Alqarni, N. (2023). Language learning strategies and learning engagement as predictors of language learning achievement: An investigation of Saudi EFL learners. Saudi Journal of Language Studies, 3(3), 129–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/SJLS-12-2022-0084

Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Engagement with language: How examining learners’ affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In M. Sato, & S. Ballinger (Eds.), Peer interaction and second language learning. Pedagogical potential and research agenda (pp. 209–240). John Benjamins.

Barkley, E. (2010). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. Jossey-Bass.

Chen, M. R. A., Hwang, G. J., Lin, Y. H., Abou-Khalil, V., Li, H., & Ogata, H. (2022). A reading engagement-promoting strategy to facilitate EFL students' mobile learning achievement, behaviour and engagement. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 16(4), 489-506. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMLO.2022.125968

Cheung, K. C., Mak, S. K., Sit, P. S., & Soh, K. C. (2016). A typology of student reading engagement: Preparing for response to intervention in the school curriculum. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 48, 32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2015.12.001

Carver, C., Jung, D. & Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2021). Examining learner engagement in relationship to learning and communication mode. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 120–142). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923613-010

Dincer, A., Yeşilyurt, S., Noels, K. A., & Vargas Lascano, D. I. (2019). Self-Determination and classroom engagement of EFL learners: A mixed-methods study of the self-system model of motivational development. Sage Open, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019853913

Dörnyei, Z. (2019). Towards a better understanding of the L2 learning experience, the Cinderella of the L2 motivational self-system. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.14746/ssllt.2019.9.1.2.

Dörnyei, Z., & Kormos, J. (2000). The role of individual and social variables in oral task performance. Language Teaching Research, 4(3), 275–300.

Fisher, W. (1992). Reliability, separation, strata statistics. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 6(3), 238. Retrieved March 15, 2024, from https://www.rasch.org/rmt/rmt63i.htm

Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–109.

Fredericks, J., Filsecker, M., & Lawson, M. (2016). Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learning and Instruction, 43, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002

Hamedi, S. M., Pishghadam, R., & Fadardi, J. S. (2020). The contribution of reading emotions to reading comprehension: The mediating effect of reading engagement using a structural equation modeling approach. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 19, 211–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10671-019-09256-3

Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses related to achievement. Routledge.

Helme, S., & Clarke, D. (2001). Identifying cognitive engagement in the mathematics classroom. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 13, 133–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217103

Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., & Mercer, S. (Eds.) (2021). Student engagement in the language classroom. Multilingual Matters.

Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., & Wu, J. (2024). Engagement in language learning: A systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teaching Research, 28(1), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211001289

Hiver, P., Zhou, S., Tahmouresi, S., Sang, Y., & Papi, M. (2020). Why stories matter: Exploring learner engagement and metacognition through narratives of the L2 learning experience. System, 91, 102260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102260

Hodge, B., Wright, B. & Bennett, P. (2018). The role of grit in determining engagement and academic outcomes for university students. Research in Higher Education, 59, 448–460. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9474-y

Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. https://doi.10.1080/10888430802132279

Khajavy, G. (2021). Modeling the relations between foreign language engagement, emotions, grit and reading achievement. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 241–259). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923613-016

Kiatkeeree, J., & Ruangjaroon, S. (2022). Unveiling the relationship between the grit of Thai English language learners, engagement, and language achievement in an online setting. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 602-624.

Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83, 432–479.

Li, J., King, R. B., & Wang, C. (2022). Profiles of motivation and engagement in foreign language learning: Associations with emotional factors, academic achievement, and demographic features. System, 108, 102820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2022.102820

Mercer, S. (2015). Learner agency and engagement: Believing you can, wanting to, and knowing how to. Humanizing Language Teaching, 17(4), 1–19.

Mercer, S. (2019). Language learner engagement: Setting the scene. In Gao, X. (Ed.), Second handbook of English language teaching (pp. 1–19). Springer.

Mercer, S., & Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Engaging language learners in contemporary classrooms. Cambridge University Press.

Mercer, S., Talbot, K. R., & Wang, I. K. H. (2021). Fake or real engagement–Looks can be deceiving. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 143–162). Multilingual Matters.

Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., Fryer, L. K. (2021). Engagement growth in language learning classrooms: A latent growth analysis of engagement in Japanese elementary schools. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 224–240). Multilingual Matters.

Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., & Nakata, Y. (2017). Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System, 65, 151-163. https://doi.10.1016/j.system.2017.01.011

Philp, J., & Duchesne, S. (2016). Exploring engagement in tasks in the language classroom. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 50-72. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190515000094

Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer.

Reeve, J. (2013). How students create motivationally supportive learning environments for themselves: The concept of agentic engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(3), 579–595. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032690

Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (2012). Jingle, jangle, and conceptual haziness: Evolution and future directions of the engagement construct. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 3-19). Springer.

Sang, Y., & Hiver, P. (2021). Engagement and companion constructs in language learning: Conceptualizing learners’ involvement in the L2 classroom. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 17–37). Multilingual Matters.

Sinatra, G.M., Heddy, B. C., & Lombardi, D. (2015). The challenges of defining and measuring student engagement in science. Educational Psychology, 50, 1–13.

Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., Connell, J. P., & Wellborn, J. G. (2009). Engagement and disaffection as organizational constructs in the dynamics of motivational development. In H. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 223-245). Routledge.

Suárez-Álvarez, J., Pedrosa, I., Lozano, L. M., García Cueto, E., Cuesta Izquierdo, M., & Muñiz Fernández, J. (2018). Using reversed items in Likert scales: A questionable practice. Psicothema, 30.

Suárez-Orozco, C., Pimentel, A., & Martin, M. (2009). The Significance of relationships: Academic engagement and achievement among newcomer immigrant youth. Teachers College Record, 111(3), 712-749. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146810911100308

Svalberg, A. M. L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18, 242–258.

Zhou, S., Hiver, P., & Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2021). Measuring L2 engagement: A review of issues and applications. In P. Hiver, A. H. Al-Hoorie, & S. Mercer (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom (pp. 75–98). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781788923613-008

Downloads

Published

2025-01-01

Issue

Section

Articles