Insights Into How Digital Tools and Platforms Facilitate Foreign Language Learning and Reflections on Ethical Issues
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1602.07Keywords:
digital technology, foreign language learning, digital platforms, digital privacy, ethics in digital toolsAbstract
This article investigates the latest language teaching and learning digital platforms, particularly concerning the impact of emerging instructional technologies and digitalized communication on foreign language learning. Computer systems, tablets, and smartphones are all considered as they relate to the effects of rapidly developing technological innovations. The study also shows interest in the ethical concerns of using digital tools and platforms. The data was gathered employing a questionnaire that modelled the effect of instructors on students' independent and self-guided use of technology in language study. Fifty high school teachers and 250 high school students were polled for the study. The study's population was determined by its goals, and online surveys were sent to educators and their students. Six digital platforms were investigated: Kahoot, Kahoot Jumble, Quizlet, Quizlet Live, Duolingo, and Sporcle. The data presented and analyzed indicated a significant effect of digital tools on the learners' attitudes toward learning a foreign language. Over 80% of teachers and students accept that digital tools and platforms facilitate foreign language learning. The result further suggests a gender perspective on the usage of digital tools, with female participants dominating the usage. Also, there are ethical concerns, wherein over 70% of the students reiterate that teachers must respect their digital privacy. The results of this research could help general education teachers encourage their students to use digital tools effectively when studying a foreign language.
References
Anshari, M., Alas, Y., & Guan, L. S. (2016). Developing online learning resources: Big data, social networks, and cloud computing to support pervasive knowledge. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1663-1677.
Bauerlein, M., & Walesh, S. G. (2009). The Dumbest Generation—How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future: New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin, New York, 2008; 978-1-58542-639-3.
Belz, J. A. (2003). Linguistic perspectives on the development of intercultural competence in telecollaboration. Journal of Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), pp. 68-99.
Benson, P. (2015). Commenting to learn: Evidence of language and intercultural learning in comments on YouTube videos. Language Learning & Technology, 19(3), 88-105.
Blake, R. J. (2013). Brave new digital classroom: Technology and foreign language learning. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bolter, J. D. & Grusin, R. A. (2000). Remediation: Understanding new media. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. New York: WW Norton & Company.
Chapelle, C. A. (2017). Computer-assisted teaching and testing. In Handbook of technology, second language teaching and learning. New York and London: Blackwell-Wiley.
Chun, D. M. (2011). Developing intercultural communicative competence through online. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 392-419.
Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The modern language journal, 80(2), 183-198.
Geisler, M., Kramsch, C., McGinnis, S., Patrikis, P., Pratt, M. L., Ryding, K., & Saussy, H. (2017). Foreign Languages and Higher Education: New Structures for a Changed World: MLA Ad Hoc Committee on Foreign Languages. Profession, 234-245.
Hanna, B., De Nooy, J., & De Nooy, J. (2009). Learning language and culture via public Internet discussion forums. Springer.
Healey et al. (2018). TESOL technology standards framework. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
Hubbard, P. (2011). Evaluation of courseware and websites. Present and future promises of CALL: From theory and research to new directions in language teaching, 407-440.
Hubbard, P. (Ed.). (2009). Computer-assisted language learning: Critical concepts in linguistics. London: Routledge.
Hubbard, P., & Levy, M. (2016). Theory in computer-assisted language learning research and practice. The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology, 24-38.
Katushemererwe, F., & Nerbonne, J. (2015). Computer-assisted language learning (CALL) in support of (re)-learning native languages: the case of Runyakitara. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(2), 112-129.
Kern, R. (2016). Technology, social interaction, and FL literacy. New ways of learning and teaching: Focus on technology and foreign language education, 57-92.
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340-357.
Kern, R. (2015). Language, literacy, and technology. Cambridge University Press.
Kittler, F. (2019). The mechanized philosopher. In Looking after Nietzsche, (New York: SUNY Press), 195-207.
Lai, C. (2015). Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom. Computers & Education, 82, 74-83.
Lin, C. H., Warschauer, M., & Blake, R. (2021). Language learning through social networks: Perceptions and reality. Language Learning & Technology, 20(1), 124-147.
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design.
Manovich, L. (2001). The language of new media. MIT press.
Rego, I. D. M. S. (2015). Mobile Language Learning: How Gamification Improves the Experience. Handbook of Mobile Teaching and Learning, Springer-Verlag Berlin. 705.
Richards, J. C. (2015). The changing face of language learning: Learning beyond the classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5-22.
Sauro, S. (2014). Lessons from the fandom: Task models for technology-enhanced language learning. Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching Technology and Tasks. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schulze, J, West, S. G., & Krumm, S. (2016). The knowledge, skills, abilities, and other characteristics required for face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication: Similar or distinct constructs?. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-016-9465-6
Toven-Lindsey, B., Rhoads, R. A., & Lozano, J. B. (2015). Virtually unlimited classrooms: Pedagogical practices in massive open online courses. The internet and higher education, 24, 1-12.
Wade, E. R. & Chun, D. M. (2004). Collaborative cultural exchanges with CMC. Teaching with technology, Heinle Boston, MA. 220-247.
