The Effects of Task Types and Working Memory Capacity on the Writing Production of Chinese EFL Learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1602.17Keywords:
task complexity, task type, working memory, CALF, EFL writingAbstract
The current study aimed to examine the effects of two types of writing tasks—an independent writing task and an integrated writing task—on 144 Chinese EFL learners’ writing production in terms of fluency, accuracy, lexical complexity, and syntactic complexity. Additionally, it investigated whether the learners’ working memory capacity has a mediating effect on their writing when responding to the two different types of writing tasks. The participants took an Ospan test to measure working memory capacity. They were then randomly assigned to either the independent writing task group or the integrated writing task group. The findings revealed that, compared to the independent task group, participants in the integrated task group performed significantly better in language accuracy but worse in fluency. The results of this study partially supported Robinson’s Cognition Hypothesis (CH). Results showed that working memory capacity has a significant positive effect on syntactic complexity and accuracy; however, its interactive role with task type was only observed in accuracy.
References
Abrams, Z. I. (2019). The effects of integrated writing on linguistic complexity in L2 writing and task-complexity. System, 81, 110-121.
Baddeley, A. (2020). Working memory. Memory (pp. 71-111). Routledge.
Biber, D., Gray, B., & Staples, S. (2016). Predicting patterns of grammatical complexity across language exam task types and proficiency levels. Applied Linguistics, 37(5), 639-668.
Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity, modality, and working memory in L2 task performance. System, 72, 85-98.
Cumming, A., Kantor, R., Baba, K., Erdosy, U., Eouanzoui, K., & James, M. (2005). Differences in written discourse in independent and integrated prototype tasks for next generation TOEFL. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 5-43.
Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(1), 19-23.
Güvendir, E., & Uzun, K. (2023). L2 writing anxiety, working memory, and task complexity in L2 written performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 60, 101016, 1-15.
Jovari, M. (2020). Effect of topic familiarity on summary writing of Iranian intermediate EFL learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 3(8), 22-35.
Kellogg, R. T. (1999). The Psychology of Writing (pp. 157-187). Oxford University Press.
Kormos, J. (2012). The role of individual differences in L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), 390-403.
Kormos, J., & Sáfár, A. (2008). Phonological short-term memory, working memory and foreign language performance in intensive language learning. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11(2), 261-271.
Kuiken, F., & Vedder, I. (2012). Syntactic complexity, lexical variation and accuracy as a function of task complexity and proficiency level in L2 writing and speaking. Dimensions of L2 Performance and Proficiency: Complexity, Accuracy and Fluency in SLA (pp.143-170). John Benjamins Publishing Company
Kyle, K., & Crossley, S. (2016). The relationship between lexical sophistication and independent and source-based writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 34, 12-24.
Lee, J. (2020). Task closure and task complexity effects on L2 written performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100777, 1-14.
Lu, X. (2010). Automatic analysis of syntactic complexity in second language writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(4), 474-496.
Malone, J. (2018). Incidental vocabulary learning in SLA: Effects of frequency, aural enhancement, and working memory. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 651-675.
Mavrou, I. (2020). Working memory, executive functions, and emotional intelligence in second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 50, 100758, 1-15.
Michel, M., Kormos, J., Brunfaut, T., & Ratajczak, M. (2019). The role of working memory in young second language learners’ written performances. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 31-45.
Ong, J. (2013). Discovery of ideas in second language writing task environment. System, 41(3), 529-542.
Plakans, L. (2008). Comparing composing processes in writing-only and reading-to-write test tasks. Assessing Writing, 13(2), 111-129.
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17(1), 18-34.
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2013). Using multiple texts in an integrated writing assessment: Source text use as a predictor of score. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(3), 217-230.
Plakans, L., & Gebril, A. (2017). Exploring the relationship of organization and connection with scores in integrated writing assessment. Assessing Writing, 31, 98-112.
Rahimi, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2018). Effects of task complexity and planning conditions on L2 argumentative writing production. Discourse Processes, 55(8), 726-742.
Révész, A., Kourtali, N. E., & Mazgutova, D. (2017). Effects of task complexity on L2 writing behaviors and linguistic complexity. Language Learning, 67(1), 208-241.
Révész, A., Sachs, R., & Hama, M. (2014). The effects of task complexity and input frequency on the acquisition of the past counterfactual construction through recasts. Language Learning, 64(3), 615-650.
Robinson, P. (2001a). Task complexity, cognitive resources, and syllabus design: A triadic framework for examining task influences on SLA (pp. 287–318). In Cambridge University Press eBooks.
Robinson, P. (2003). The cognitive hypothesis, task design, and adult task-based language learning. Second Language Studies, 21(2), 45-105.
Robinson, P. (2005b). Cognitive complexity and task sequencing: Studies in a componential framework for second language task design. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 43(1), 1-32.
Robinson, P. (2007). Task complexity, theory of mind, and intentional reasoning: Effects on L2 speech production, interaction, uptake and perceptions of task difficulty. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 45(3), 193-213.
Robinson, P. (2011a). Task Based Language Learning: A review of issues. Language Learning, 61(s1), 1-36.
Sasayama, S. (2016). Is a ‘complex’ task really complex? validating the assumption of cognitive task complexity. The Modern Language Journal, 100(1), 231-254.
Skehan, P. (2001). Tasks and language performance. In Researching pedagogic tasks: Second Language Learning, Teaching, and Testing (pp. 167-185). Routledge.
Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1996). Task type and task processing conditions as influences on foreign language performance. Language Teaching Research, 1(3), 185-211.
Storch, N. (2009). The impact of studying in a second language (L2) medium university on the development of L2 writing. Journal of Second language Writing, 18(2), 103-118.
Tabari, M. A. (2022). Investigating the interactions between L2 writing processes and products under different task planning time conditions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 55.10871, 1-16.
Unsworth, N., Redick, T. S., Heitz, R. P., Broadway, J. M., & Engle, R. W. (2009). Complex working memory span tasks and higher-order cognition: A latent-variable analysis of the relationship between processing and storage. Memory, 17(6), 635-654.
Vasylets, O., & Marín, J. (2021). The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 52, 100786, 1-14.
Wolfe-Quintero, K. E., Inagaki, S., & Kim, H. Y. (1998). Second Language Development in Writing: Measures of Fluency, Accuracy (pp. 103-115), University of Hawaii Press.
Zabihi, R. (2018). The role of cognitive and affective factors in measures of L2 writing. Written Communication, 35(1), 32-57.
Zalbidea, J. (2017). ‘One task fits all’? The roles of task complexity, modality, and working memory capacity in L2 performance. The Modern Language Journal, 101(2), 335-352.
Zhang, J. (2018). The effect of strategic planning training on cohesion in EFL learners’ essays. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(6), 554-567.
